Wednesday May 23, 2018 | 4:00 pm - 5:30 pm

Please complete this evaluation which will be used to finalize the accreditation process. Kindly take 2-3 minutes to complete all of the below questions. 

Question Title

* 1. Please indicate your answer for each question below

  Strongly Agree (5) Agree (4) Neutral (3) Disagree (2) Strongly Disagree(1)
This session was appropriate and will help me modify my practice
This session met my needs

Question Title

* 2. Did you perceive any degree of bias in any part of the presentation?

Question Title

* 3. Did the activity respect the Quebec Code of Ethics (CQDPCM)?

Question Title

* 4. The session fulfilled the learning objectives defined below (See question 5)

Question Title

* 5. At the conclusion of this activity I will be able to:

  Yes No
Provide pain clinicians with key practical information on initiation and titration of cannabinoids for the management of chronic pain.
Provide pain clinicians with a Canadian model of a specialized medical clinic, where excellence in cannabis-related research, training of health professionals and patient care is achieved by an interdisciplinary team approach.
Describe current and future examples of research on medical cannabis for chronic pain. Particular emphasis will be given on showing the efforts made to overcome the methodological limitations of previous studies, which may have hindered the clinical benefits of cannabis in chronic pain (as they will be reported in the patient’s testimonial).

Question Title

* 6. Speaker 1 Evaluation: Michael A. Dworkind

  Strongly Agree (5) Agree(4) Neutral (3) Disagree(2) Strongly Disagree(1)
The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject
This program content has enhanced my knowledge
The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking

Question Title

* 7. Did the presenter (Speaker 1) make a disclosure statement? (Verbal and with slide)

Question Title

* 8. Speaker 2 Evaluation: Maria-Fernanda Arboleda

  Strongly Agree (5) Agree(4) Neutral (3) Disagree(2) Strongly Disagree(1)
The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject
This program content has enhanced my knowledge
The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking

Question Title

* 9. Did the presenter (Speaker 2) make a disclosure statement? (Verbal and with slide)

Question Title

* 10. Speaker 3 Evaluation: Daphnée Elisma

  Strongly Agree (5) Agree(4) Neutral (3) Disagree(2) Strongly Disagree(1)
The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject
This program content has enhanced my knowledge
The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking

Question Title

* 11. Did the presenter (Speaker 3) make a disclosure statement? (Verbal and with slide)

T