Brownson Unnatural as Extreme Question Title * 1. Are primary verbs important in understanding the meaning of the Romans 1:23-27 passage? Yes No Sometimes I'm not sure Comments: Question Title * 2. In working to understand the meaning of the three instances of the verb “exchanged” in Romans 1:23-27 is it necessary to address the verb “giving up” at the same time? No Yes Maybe I'm not sure Comment: Question Title * 3. Is it significant that Professor Brownson’s table omits 61% of the words in the passage in question? Yes No I'm not sure Maybe Comments: Question Title * 4. Is the chiastic analysis of Romans 1:18-29 a legitimate reflection of Paul’s message in that passage? Maybe No Yes I'm not sure Comments: Question Title * 5. Are the words “were consumed” of verse 27 tied to the word “unnatural” from verse 26 as in the table or are they better associated with the words of verse 22, “Claiming to be wise, they became fools”? Neither “Unnatural” “Claiming to be wise, they became fools” I'm not sure Comments: Question Title * 6. With his understanding of “unnatural” does Dr. Brownson succeed in providing evidence that Romans 1 does not prohibit a certain activity that goes contrary to a universal standard, but instead, prohibits activities that are done to the extreme? Yes No Undecided It is not possible to tell Comments: Question Title * 7. Which analysis of the two, the table given by Professor Brownson or the chiastic structure, more accurately reflects the biblical message of Romans 1? The table The chiastic structure Neither Uncertain Comments: Question Title * 8. Does the word “unnatural” from verse 26 carry the meaning of “extreme”? Yes No It is not possible to know I am not sure Comments: Done