Skip to content
SecureRIS Survey
1.
How much of a concern is wireless signal interception or eavesdropping in your organization’s network?
A great deal
A lot
A moderate amount
A little
None at all
2.
How frequently do network congestion, interference, or signal leakage impact your ability to maintain reliable service?
Always
Usually
Sometimes
Rarely
Never
3.
How satisfied are you with your current wireless security and interference mitigation solutions?
Very satisfied
Satisfied
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied
Dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
4.
Which ONE capability would be MOST valuable in a wireless security solution?
Physical-layer signal control
Reduced signal leakage beyond facility perimeter
Improved signal strength in high-density areas
Compatibility with existing 5G/WiFi systems
Low additional power consumption
5.
If SecureRIS were available today and validated to improve both reliability and physical-layer security, how likely would you be to purchase or pilot it?
Very likely
Likely
Neither likely nor unlikely
Unlikely
Very unlikely
6.
If SecureRIS demonstrated a measurable improvement (e.g., 20% SNR gain and reduced signal leakage), what would your expected adoption timeline be?
No plans to adopt
More than 24 months
12–24 months
6–12 months
Within 6 months
7.
What annual budget range would you realistically allocate for a solution that measurably improves wireless security and reliability in your facility?
< $10,000
$10,000 - $50,000
$50,000 - $150,000
$150,000 - $500,000
> $500,000
8.
Which pricing model would you prefer?
One-time hardware purchase
Hardware + annual software subscription
Fully managed service (subscription-based)
Pilot program first before full deployment
Not sure
9.
What would be your PRIMARY concern when evaluating a new RIS-based wireless solution?
Installation complexity
Integration with existing infrastructure
Cost
Regulatory or compliance issues
ROI uncertainty
Reliability concerns
I would have no major concerns
10.
What is your current role/job title?