Skip to content

HQIP Stakeholder Survey 2012

3.Introduction, confidentiality and guidance / About you / Overall feedback

20%
Introduction, confidentiality and guidance

Introduction: HQIP is seeking feedback from stakeholders on how well we support the re-invigoration of clinical audit as a whole, and how much we help your work on audit in particular.

Confidentiality: This survey has been anonymised - personal contact details are not being recorded, and this includes respondents' IP addresses. Responses are automatically limited to one response per computer and email sender to further ensure the integrity of results.

Guidance on completing the survey: This form is grouped into the following sections:

Page 1. (this page, scroll down) About you / Overall feedback
Page 2. National Clinical Audit support (including the National Joint Registry)
Page 3. Quality Improvement & Development support (including local clinical audit)
Page 4. Communications support
Page 5. Other HQIP work

For many respondents it will be relevant to complete more than one of these areas: please do not restrict yourself to only one category. However, if only one section is appropriate, please restrict yourself to that area of our work, but please do comment on your overall perception of your work.

Once you have completed a section - or to ignore irrelevant sections and move to subsequent areas of the survey - scroll to the bottom of the page and click 'Next'.

Ratings scales of 1-5 are used throughout this survey. In all instances, 5 = the most positive response and 1 = the least positive.

Thank you for supporting us in enabling effective evaluation of our work.

PART ONE: About you / overall feedback

1.About your role in relationship to HQIP (please tick the option which most accurately describes your role)(Required.)
2.How much does clinical audit-related activity form part of your work?(Required.)
3.Your views of HQIP’s overall effectiveness in its first 3.6 years of contract on clinical audit
(1 = weaker, 5 = excellent - please answer as many questions as are relevant to you)
1
2
3
4
5
i. As a whole, how do you rate HQIP’s efforts to re-invigorate clinical audit?
ii. How do you rate HQIP’s efforts to re-invigorate audit at the national audit level?
iii. How do you rate HQIP’s efforts to re-invigorate audit at the local audit level?
iv. How do you rate HQIP’s efforts to involve patients in clinical audit?
v. How do you rate HQIP’s efforts to involve clinicians in clinical audit?
vi. How do you rate HQIP’s efforts to improve boards' awareness/use of clinical audit?
vii. How do you rate HQIP’s efforts to improve commissioner use of clinical audit?
viii. How important is HQIP to your work?
4.What do you think HQIP does well? What could it improve? (Please tick as many responses as are relevant)
Does well
Could improve*
Running a national programme
Commissioning of national clinical audits
Managing/contracting of national audits
Improving skills in audit
Supporting local audit staff
Providing events and resources
Distributing news and information
Other communications, including website
Listening to and acting on concerns
5.Is there any other organisation that supports your audit needs better?
6.Is there anything you feel HQIP does not currently do in relation to clinical audit, but should?
7.Would you like to see HQIP continuing to run the national programme of supporting clinical audit?
8.Do you feel more confident in clinical audit as a result of the advice, support or resources HQIP provides?