2018 Legislative Session * 1. Name: OK * 2. Town you reside in: OK * 3. Age: 17-24 25-35 36-50 51-65 65+ OK * 4. Employment status: Full time Part time Unemployed Disabled Retired OK * 5. Living situation: Renter Homeowner Second homeowner College Student Other (please specify) OK * 6. Rank issues according to how much time the Vermont Legislature should spend on them in the January - May 2018 Session with 1 being the most time. Please identify "other" issues you'd like time spent on. You aren't required to rank all options, but are welcome to do so. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Access to high quality childcare 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Climate Change 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Drug abuse 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Growing the size of Vermont’s population 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Healthcare 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Improving water quality 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Internet access and/or speeds 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Legalizing Marijuana 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Mandating Paid Family Leave 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Property taxes 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Protecting Vermonter’s personal data 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Raising Vermont’s Minimum Wage 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Workforce Housing - increasing 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Other OK * 7. Would you support a .05% increase in the Vermont Universal Service Fee paid on telephone bills to increase public dollars available to build last mile internet service? This would be an approximately $0.50 additional monthly charge on a $100 landline bill. Yes No Comment: OK * 8. Would you support a Vermont only ban on bump stocks? The bump stock is not banned under federal law. It allows a weapon to fire at nearly the rate of a machine gun without technically converting it to a fully automatic firearm. It is illegal for private citizens to possess fully automatic firearms manufactured after May 19, 1986; ownership of earlier models requires a federal license. Yes No Comment: OK * 9. Many groups are advocating for increased state support for child care and post secondary education. Would you be in favor of paying increased education property taxes to support high quality childcare or increased funding to in state college and post secondary training programs? Yes I would pay more education property taxes for increased funding for high quality childcare Yes I would pay more education property taxes to increase funding for instate colleges and post secondary training programs No I am not in favor of paying for either with education property taxes Comment: OK * 10. Please include your email address below to receive legislative update emails from Rep. Laura Sibilia OK DONE