The collaboration between pharmaceutical companies and patient advocates often requires both parties to sign contracts, e.g. in the form of speaker’s agreements, consultancy or collaboration contracts. They define the terms and conditions of the collaboration e.g. confidentiality, intellectual property, copyright, data protection, compensation and other responsibilities of both parties.

However, these contracts are often too long, difficult to understand for patient advocates, contain ambiguous clauses, or even contain terms that are in conflict with the very nature of patient advocacy, or put the signing patient advocate at legal risk. 

MPE, in collaboration with other patient organisations, is conducting a project to analyse legal agreements of pharmaceutical companies with patient advocates. The project will make suggestions for simpler, more understandable agreements that would sufficiently reflect and protect the interests of both parties.

This survey is now asking you for your perspective and experience as a patient advocate based on consultancy, collaboration, advisory board and speaker agreements, but excludes contacts on funding, grants and sponsoring. We would be grateful for your input. Thank you!
 
 
*This survey has been developed by MPE with the support of the following advocates: Tamas Bereczky, European AIDS Treatment Group, (EATG); David Harry (EATG); Jan Geissler (CML Advocates Network); Kathy Oliver, International Brain Tumor Alliance (IBTA); Anna Rovira, Myeloma Patients Europe (MPE); and Ananda Plate (MPE).
 

Question Title

* 1. Do you read all legal agreements in detail before you sign them?

Question Title

* 2. If rarely or never, why?

Question Title

* 3. How many of these legal agreements do you understand?

Question Title

* 4. How many pages do you usually find in most of the legal agreements you receive?

Question Title

* 5. How many pages do you think are reasonable for a contract document?

Question Title

* 6. Which clauses of the legal agreements do you usually find in an unreasonable form?

Question Title

* 7. If you find unreasonable clauses, do you try to change them by rejecting the clauses?

Question Title

* 8. If yes, did the companies agree on changing these clauses to your satisfaction?

Question Title

* 9. How much time (in minutes) do you usually invest for each agreement?

Question Title

* 10. Did you ever suffer from any legal consequences related to those contracts, e.g. has the contract led to arguments after the delivery of your work?

Question Title

* 11. Would you like to add any comment, or describe additional thoughts you have about legal agreements between pharmaceutical companies and patient advocates?

Question Title

* 12. Would you share your contact details with us? (Optional)
Please share your contact details. This information will only be shared within the project team. We will only contact you for clarification purposes and to send you the results of the project.

T