Question Title

* 1. Which member organisation do you represent?

Question Title

* 2. Do you think the DTS construction types for each climate zone are appropriate?

Question Title

* 3. Do you think the integration of the thermal bridging provisions in the manner proposed by the code is the appropriate pathway?

Question Title

* 4. Do you support the stringency of the presented elemental provisions? (this needs to be considered in the context of the allowable glazing allowance)?

Question Title

* 5. Do you have any other feedback on the stringency of the elemental provisions? Please outline your suggestions below.

Question Title

* 6. How do you rank the importance of alignment of the NatHERS and the elemental provisions?

1 - Not important to align 10 - Very important to align
Clear
i We adjusted the number you entered based on the slider’s scale.

Question Title

* 7. The proposed insulation requirements can be simplified by reducing the number of options provided in the look-up tables. However, that means other compliance options, such as NatHERS, VURB or a Performance Solution, need to be used in those circumstances. Would it be preferable to simplify the tables with less combinations for options?

Question Title

* 8. Do you think the condensation provisions will be well understood by industry?

Question Title

* 9. Do you support the make-up air provision using a door undercut?

Question Title

* 10. Do you expect the make-up air provision using a door undercut will conflict with other areas of the code?

Question Title

* 11. Do you believe the roof ventilation provisions should have been extended to climates zones 4 & 5 to be consistent with the walls?

Question Title

* 12. Any other technical comments? (Please present in the form of problem/proposed solution)

T