Skip to content
Native AOT Survey
*
1.
Which of the following languages do you primarily use to complete day to day work?
(Required.)
Go
C/C++
C#
F#
Rust
Swift
Other (please specify)
*
2.
What have you done in CoreRT (experimental project)?
(Required.)
I have tried compiling a .NET application using CoreRT toolchain
I have run an application compiled using CoreRT toolchain successfully
I have deployed application compiled using CoreRT toolchain in production
I haven't tried CoreRT
Other (please specify)
*
3.
Overall, how satisfied or dissatisfied are you with CoreRT?
(Required.)
Extremely satisfied
Satisfied
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied
Dissatisfied
Extremely dissatisfied
N/A
4.
What, if anything, do you find frustrating or unappealing about CoreRT?
*
5.
Why do you use a native AOT technology?
(Required.)
Fast Startup time
Building Native libraries
Size of the executable
Deterministic performance characteristics, No JIT
Security, No JIT
Obfuscation
Less memory consumption
Statically link managed and native code into a single binary
I don't use a native AOT technology
Other (please specify)
6.
Does the lack of officially supported native AOT option prevent you from using .NET more?
I would like to write more projects in .NET, but am not able to due to missing native AOT option
I have rewritten .NET projects in a different environment due to missing native AOT option in .NET
I am satisfied with the current level of native AOT support
I am unhappy with he current level of support, but native AOT is meeting my technical needs
I do not use .NET Native AOT support