While we like to have fun here at IJNR, we also take our mission very seriously. Because of this, we like to enlist our alumni to help make sure that our programs are the very best they can be. If there was a portion of this workshop that you either really loved or found to be a waste of time, please tell us! Your thoughtful feedback will help ensure that IJNR's programming continues to be relevant and useful to journalists. Oh, and our funders require this kind of reporting - so it's pretty darn important. Thank you for your time and effort!

Question Title

* 1. Please rate each portion of the PFAS Workshop:

  A = Excellent B = Very Good C = Decent D = Lousy F = Terrible
Welcome and Introductory Session
A Chemical Walks Into an Environment...How PFAS Gets into the Wider World and How to Get It Out
Contains PFAS: Evaluating Risk and Exposure in Humans and Animals
Safety Dance over PFAS: What Could a New Administration Mean for PFAS Policy?
A Conversation with Linda Birnbaum
Origin Story: West Virginia
Military Faceoff: New Mexico
Proactive Policy: Michigan
Reporter Happy Hour

Question Title

* 2. Don't worry! We're not making you rate them all, but please read through the list of speakers and, if a name stands out, let us know! If you found any of these speakers to be particularly outstanding (engaging, helpful, information-laden, etc.) or particularly unimpressive (unhelpful, boring, uninformed), please share your thoughts so we know who to invite to speak to journalists again in the future.

Question Title

* 3. Please pretend you're Goldilocks, and rate the content, pace, and delivery of the PFAS Workshop, on a "too much," "not enough," and "just right" scale.

  Too Much Just Right Not Enough
Content
Breaks
Q&A

Question Title

* 4. If you said "too much" content, what would recommend cutting? Or, if you said "not enough" content, what would you recommend adding?

Question Title

* 5. Was the amount of time devoted to each topic sufficient?

Question Title

* 6. We've only conducted a few virtual workshops, and we're still working out the kinks.  As we look toward a future with more virtual programming in it, we need your help determining the best approach. Based on your experience, would you prefer:

Question Title

* 7. How did the workshop measure up to your expectations?

Question Title

* 8. Would you consider attending another virtual IJNR workshop?

Question Title

* 9. Would you consider attending a two-day in-person IJNR workshop in the future, post-pandemic?

Question Title

* 10. Would you consider attending a week-long IJNR institute in the future, post-pandemic?

Question Title

* 11. Would you recommend an IJNR workshop to a friend or colleague?

Question Title

* 12. Do you feel that you gained a number of valuable story ideas over the course of the workshop?

Question Title

* 13. If so, how may stories do you hope to produce, based on the workshop, within the next 6 months?

Question Title

* 14. Please give the PFAS Workshop an overall grade:

Question Title

* 15. Finally, journalist testimonials can be valuable feedback for our staff, as well as powerful promotional tools for our funders. If you'd like to leave a few last thoughts on the program, we'd appreciate it.

Question Title

* 16. Name (if you'd rather leave your answers anonymous, just type "anonymous" or some other fancy pseudonym. HOWEVER, if you have anything good to say about us, our funders will only believe us if we can attribute the quote to someone, so we leave this option just in case!)

T