29th Annual TNP Conference Workshop S37 Evaluation - Appraising the Evidence: Research, Guidelines and QI Survey

	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree
Identify similarities and differences in evidence appraisal research, clinical guidelines and quality improvement	Identify similarities and differences in evidence appraisal research, clinical guidelines and quality improvement Strongly Disagree	Identify similarities and differences in evidence appraisal research, clinical guidelines and quality improvement Disagree	Identify similarities and differences in evidence appraisal research, clinical guidelines and quality improvement Agree	Identify similarities and differences in evidence appraisal research, clinical guidelines and quality improvement Strongly Agree
Evaluate clinical data/reports using critical appraisal strategies tailored for research, clinical practice	Evaluate clinical data/reports using critical appraisal strategies tailored for research, clinical practice Strongly Disagree	Evaluate clinical data/reports using critical appraisal strategies tailored for research, clinical practice Disagree	Evaluate clinical data/reports using critical appraisal strategies tailored for research, clinical practice Agree	Evaluate clinical data/reports using critical appraisal strategies tailored for research, clinical practice Strongly Agree
Interpret run charts associated with quality improvement data (e.g., provider scorecards, adverse events)	Interpret run charts associated with quality improvement data (e.g., provider scorecards, adverse events) Strongly Disagree	Interpret run charts associated with quality improvement data (e.g., provider scorecards, adverse events) Disagree	Interpret run charts associated with quality improvement data (e.g., provider scorecards, adverse events) Agree	Interpret run charts associated with quality improvement data (e.g., provider scorecards, adverse events) Strongly Agree

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Agree

Strongly Agree

Identify similarities and differences in evidence appraisal research, clinical guidelines and quality improvement

Identify similarities and differences in evidence appraisal research, clinical guidelines and quality improvement Strongly Disagree

Identify similarities and differences in evidence appraisal research, clinical guidelines and quality improvement Disagree

Identify similarities and differences in evidence appraisal research, clinical guidelines and quality improvement Agree

Identify similarities and differences in evidence appraisal research, clinical guidelines and quality improvement Strongly Agree

Evaluate clinical data/reports using critical appraisal strategies tailored for research, clinical practice

Evaluate clinical data/reports using critical appraisal strategies tailored for research, clinical practice Strongly Disagree

Evaluate clinical data/reports using critical appraisal strategies tailored for research, clinical practice Disagree

Evaluate clinical data/reports using critical appraisal strategies tailored for research, clinical practice Agree

Evaluate clinical data/reports using critical appraisal strategies tailored for research, clinical practice Strongly Agree

Interpret run charts associated with quality improvement data (e.g., provider scorecards, adverse events)

Speaker(s) fully disclosed any conflict of interest and discussion of off-label usage of medication and/or medical devices at beginning of, or during the presentation.

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Agree

Strongly Agree

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Agree

Strongly Agree

Question Title

I would recommend this speaker for future conference.

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

No Opinion

Agree

Strongly Agree

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

No Opinion

Agree

Strongly Agree

29th Annual TNP Conference Workshop S37 Evaluation - Appraising the Evidence: Research, Guidelines and QI

29th Annual TNP Conference Workshop S37 Evaluation - Research, Guidelines and QI

Question Title

S37: As a result of my participation in the Appraising the Evidence: Research, Guidelines and QI, I am better to:

Question Title

The teaching methods used were appropriate to the objectives.

Question Title

Valerie Danesh demonstrated experimental knowledge of the topic.

Question Title

The individual objectives/content topic were cohesive with one another.

Question Title

The content of the program was balanced and free of commercial bias.

Question Title

Speaker(s) fully disclosed any conflict of interest and discussion of off-label usage of medication and/or medical devices at beginning of, or during the presentation.

Question Title

I would recommend this speaker for future conference.