Skip to content
LCANZ Member Survey: State of LCA Practice in New Zealand 2026
1.
What is your primary role?
LCA practitioner / analyst
Sustainability consultant
Environmental engineer
Academic / researcher
Sustainability manager or specialist
Policy / government
Other (please specify)
2.
Years of experience in LCA or life cycle thinking
<2 years
2–5 years
5–10 years
10+ years
3.
Primary sector(s) you work in: (Select all that apply)
Construction / infrastructure
Manufacturing
Agriculture / forestry
Energy
Waste and recycling
Water services
Transport
Consumer goods
Other (please specify)
4.
Organisation type
Consultancy
Manufacturer / industry
Government / council
Research institution / university
NGO / industry body
Other (please specify)
5.
Which LCA software/tools do you currently use? (Select all that apply)
SimaPro
GaBi
OpenLCA
One Click LCA
Umberto
eTool
Brightway
Makersite
EC3
BRANZ LCAQuick
NZGBC Embodied Carbon Calculator
Nezo
Excel-based tools (in-house models)
Other (please specify)
6.
Which tool is your primary LCA platform?
SimaPro
GaBi
OpenLCA
One Click LCA
Umberto
eTool
Brightway
Makersite
EC3
BRANZ LCAQuick
NZGBC Embodied Carbon Calculator
Nezo
Excel-based tools (in-house models)
Other (please specify)
7.
How do you primarily access your tools?
Web/Cloud
Desktop
8.
How frequently do you use LCA tools?
Daily
Weekly
Monthly
Occasionally (project-based)
9.
What types of assessments do you typically perform? (Select all that apply)
Full LCA (cradle-to-grave)
Cradle-to-gate assessments
Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs)
Carbon footprinting only
Screening LCAs
Circularity / material flow analysis
Other (please specify)
10.
Which life cycle inventory (LCI) databases do you use? (Select all that apply)
ecoinvent
Sphera/GaBi
One Click LCA
EC3
Inventory of Carbon & Energy (ICE)
Swiss Federal Administration LCI Database (BAFU)
IDEMAT
AusLCI
US LCI Database
NECO₂
Low Carbon Materials Hub
HiQLCD
Other (please specify)
11.
How adequate are current datasets for New Zealand conditions?
Very adequate
Adequate
Neutral
Inadequate
Very inadequate
12.
Where do you experience the biggest data gaps? (Select all that apply)
Local electricity/grid data
Transport and logistics
Construction materials
Agriculture / land use
Waste and end-of-life
Water-related processes
Other (please specify)
13.
How would you rate your primary LCA tool on the following?
Poor
Fair
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Ease of use
Poor
Fair
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Transparency of calculations
Poor
Fair
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Flexibility/customisation
Poor
Fair
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Speed/performance
Poor
Fair
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Reporting/export capabilities
Poor
Fair
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Integration with other tools (e.g., BIM, ERP)
Poor
Fair
Good
Very Good
Excellent
14.
What are the main limitations of your current tools?
15.
Do you rely on supplementary tools alongside LCA software?
Yes (go to question 16)
No
16.
If yes, please specify
17.
Which standards/frameworks do you commonly work to? (Select all that apply)
ISO 14040/44
ISO 14067 (carbon footprint)
EN 15804
Toitū carbon certification
Infrastructure sustainability frameworks (e.g., IS Rating)
I just assume the software conforms to the appropriate standards
Other (please specify)
18.
What outputs do your clients/stakeholders most commonly require?
EPDs
Carbon footprints
Comparative LCAs
Internal decision-support models
Regulatory compliance
Other (please specify)
19.
How confident are you in using your primary LCA tool?
Very confident
Confident
Moderate
Low confidence
20.
Where do you see capability gaps in the NZ LCA community? (Select all that apply)
Tool proficiency
Data availability
Interpretation of results
Communication of results
Standardisation/consistency
Critical review capability
Other (please specify)
21.
Any additional comments or insights on LCA tools and practice in New Zealand?
22.
Are you interested in joining LCANZ, the peak organisation for Life Cycle Assessment in New Zealand? If so, please provide your name and email address:
23.
If you wish to be identified with this response -please provide your email address: