Using Neuroimaging to Predict Pain and Its Relief: Clinical Utility and Neuroethics (Wednesday, May 23, 2018)

Wednesday May 23, 2018 | 11:00 am - 12:30 pm

Please complete this evaluation which will be used to finalize the accreditation process. Kindly take 2-3 minutes to complete all of the below questions.

Question Title

* 1. Please indicate your answer for each question below

	Strongly Agree (5)	Agree (4)	Neutral (3)	Disagree (2)	Strongly Disagree(1)
This session was appropriate and will help me modify my practice	This session was appropriate and will help me modify my practice Strongly Agree (5)	This session was appropriate and will help me modify my practice Agree (4)	This session was appropriate and will help me modify my practice Neutral (3)	This session was appropriate and will help me modify my practice Disagree (2)	This session was appropriate and will help me modify my practice Strongly Disagree(1)
This session met my needs	This session met my needs Strongly Agree (5)	This session met my needs Agree (4)	This session met my needs Neutral (3)	This session met my needs Disagree (2)	This session met my needs Strongly Disagree(1)

Comments

Question Title

* 2. Did you perceive any degree of bias in any part of the presentation?

Yes

No

Question Title

* 3. Did the activity respect the Quebec Code of Ethics (CQDPCM)?

Yes

No

Question Title

* 4. The session fulfilled the learning objectives defined below (See question 5)

Yes

No

Not Sure

Question Title

* 5. At the conclusion of this activity I will be able to:

	Yes	No
To understand the IASP fMRI task force recommendations on the use of brain imaging to evaluate pain, and to appreciate the utility of brain imaging to prognosticate pain relief in individual patients for personalized pain management purposes	To understand the IASP fMRI task force recommendations on the use of brain imaging to evaluate pain, and to appreciate the utility of brain imaging to prognosticate pain relief in individual patients for personalized pain management purposes Yes	To understand the IASP fMRI task force recommendations on the use of brain imaging to evaluate pain, and to appreciate the utility of brain imaging to prognosticate pain relief in individual patients for personalized pain management purposes No
To understand the utility of using diffusion tensor imaging to identify structural features of the trigeminal nerve that relate to trigeminal neuralgia and that can be predictive of long term pain relief following radiosurgery.	To understand the utility of using diffusion tensor imaging to identify structural features of the trigeminal nerve that relate to trigeminal neuralgia and that can be predictive of long term pain relief following radiosurgery. Yes	To understand the utility of using diffusion tensor imaging to identify structural features of the trigeminal nerve that relate to trigeminal neuralgia and that can be predictive of long term pain relief following radiosurgery. No
Share new information on how brain mechanisms of pain modulation and placebo research offer new directions for improving chronic pain diagnosis and treatment.	Share new information on how brain mechanisms of pain modulation and placebo research offer new directions for improving chronic pain diagnosis and treatment. Yes	Share new information on how brain mechanisms of pain modulation and placebo research offer new directions for improving chronic pain diagnosis and treatment. No

Question Title

* 6. Speaker 1 Evaluation: Karen Davis

	Strongly Agree (5)	Agree(4)	Neutral (3)	Disagree(2)	Strongly Disagree(1)
The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject	The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject Strongly Agree (5)	The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject Agree(4)	The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject Neutral (3)	The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject Disagree(2)	The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject Strongly Disagree(1)
This program content has enhanced my knowledge	This program content has enhanced my knowledge Strongly Agree (5)	This program content has enhanced my knowledge Agree(4)	This program content has enhanced my knowledge Neutral (3)	This program content has enhanced my knowledge Disagree(2)	This program content has enhanced my knowledge Strongly Disagree(1)
The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking	The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking Strongly Agree (5)	The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking Agree(4)	The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking Neutral (3)	The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking Disagree(2)	The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking Strongly Disagree(1)

Comments

Question Title

* 7. Did the presenter (Speaker 1) make a disclosure statement? (Verbal and with slide)

Yes

No

Not Sure

Question Title

* 8. Speaker 2 Evaluation: Mojgan Hodaie

	Strongly Agree (5)	Agree(4)	Neutral (3)	Disagree(2)	Strongly Disagree(1)
The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject	The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject Strongly Agree (5)	The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject Agree(4)	The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject Neutral (3)	The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject Disagree(2)	The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject Strongly Disagree(1)
This program content has enhanced my knowledge	This program content has enhanced my knowledge Strongly Agree (5)	This program content has enhanced my knowledge Agree(4)	This program content has enhanced my knowledge Neutral (3)	This program content has enhanced my knowledge Disagree(2)	This program content has enhanced my knowledge Strongly Disagree(1)
The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking	The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking Strongly Agree (5)	The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking Agree(4)	The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking Neutral (3)	The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking Disagree(2)	The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking Strongly Disagree(1)

Comments

Question Title

* 9. Did the presenter (Speaker 2) make a disclosure statement? (Verbal and with slide)

Yes

No

Not Sure

Question Title

* 10. Speaker 3 Evaluation: Javeria Ali Hashmi

	Strongly Agree (5)	Agree(4)	Neutral (3)	Disagree(2)	Strongly Disagree(1)
The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject	The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject Strongly Agree (5)	The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject Agree(4)	The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject Neutral (3)	The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject Disagree(2)	The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject Strongly Disagree(1)
This program content has enhanced my knowledge	This program content has enhanced my knowledge Strongly Agree (5)	This program content has enhanced my knowledge Agree(4)	This program content has enhanced my knowledge Neutral (3)	This program content has enhanced my knowledge Disagree(2)	This program content has enhanced my knowledge Strongly Disagree(1)
The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking	The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking Strongly Agree (5)	The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking Agree(4)	The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking Neutral (3)	The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking Disagree(2)	The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking Strongly Disagree(1)

Comments

Question Title

* 11. Did the presenter (Speaker 3) make a disclosure statement? (Verbal and with slide)

Yes

No

Not Sure