2016 Proposed Fee Methodology Consultation

Please share your feedback with us about the Proposed Fee Methodology Consultation meeting held on Thursday, April 21, 2016. We appreciate your candid responses which will remain completely anonymous.

Question Title

* 1. Overall, how productive was the meeting, i.e., did the discussion yield clear information on the proposed new fee methodology, the case for change, how it was developed, etc.?

Extremely productive

Very productive

Somewhat productive

Not that productive

Not at all productive

Question Title

* 2. Please explain your reason(s) for your rating concerning the overall meeting in the previous question.

Question Title

* 3. Please rate the following statements regarding the meeting’s content, organization and logistics.

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Not sure	Disagree	Strongly disagree
The meeting’s objectives were clearly communicated at the meeting	The meeting’s objectives were clearly communicated at the meeting Strongly Agree	The meeting’s objectives were clearly communicated at the meeting Agree	The meeting’s objectives were clearly communicated at the meeting Not sure	The meeting’s objectives were clearly communicated at the meeting Disagree	The meeting’s objectives were clearly communicated at the meeting Strongly disagree
The meeting’s objectives were met	The meeting’s objectives were met Strongly Agree	The meeting’s objectives were met Agree	The meeting’s objectives were met Not sure	The meeting’s objectives were met Disagree	The meeting’s objectives were met Strongly disagree
Registrants were provided with adequate information prior to the meeting	Registrants were provided with adequate information prior to the meeting Strongly Agree	Registrants were provided with adequate information prior to the meeting Agree	Registrants were provided with adequate information prior to the meeting Not sure	Registrants were provided with adequate information prior to the meeting Disagree	Registrants were provided with adequate information prior to the meeting Strongly disagree
The information delivered at the meeting was easy to follow and understand	The information delivered at the meeting was easy to follow and understand Strongly Agree	The information delivered at the meeting was easy to follow and understand Agree	The information delivered at the meeting was easy to follow and understand Not sure	The information delivered at the meeting was easy to follow and understand Disagree	The information delivered at the meeting was easy to follow and understand Strongly disagree
Meeting attendees were given ample opportunity to participate and ask questions	Meeting attendees were given ample opportunity to participate and ask questions Strongly Agree	Meeting attendees were given ample opportunity to participate and ask questions Agree	Meeting attendees were given ample opportunity to participate and ask questions Not sure	Meeting attendees were given ample opportunity to participate and ask questions Disagree	Meeting attendees were given ample opportunity to participate and ask questions Strongly disagree
Your questions were adequately answered by the speaker(s)	Your questions were adequately answered by the speaker(s) Strongly Agree	Your questions were adequately answered by the speaker(s) Agree	Your questions were adequately answered by the speaker(s) Not sure	Your questions were adequately answered by the speaker(s) Disagree	Your questions were adequately answered by the speaker(s) Strongly disagree
Your contribution was listened to and respected	Your contribution was listened to and respected Strongly Agree	Your contribution was listened to and respected Agree	Your contribution was listened to and respected Not sure	Your contribution was listened to and respected Disagree	Your contribution was listened to and respected Strongly disagree
The meeting was the appropriate length of time	The meeting was the appropriate length of time Strongly Agree	The meeting was the appropriate length of time Agree	The meeting was the appropriate length of time Not sure	The meeting was the appropriate length of time Disagree	The meeting was the appropriate length of time Strongly disagree
The meeting’s location fit all of the attendees comfortably (for those in-person)	The meeting’s location fit all of the attendees comfortably (for those in-person) Strongly Agree	The meeting’s location fit all of the attendees comfortably (for those in-person) Agree	The meeting’s location fit all of the attendees comfortably (for those in-person) Not sure	The meeting’s location fit all of the attendees comfortably (for those in-person) Disagree	The meeting’s location fit all of the attendees comfortably (for those in-person) Strongly disagree
The speaker(s) were easily heard	The speaker(s) were easily heard Strongly Agree	The speaker(s) were easily heard Agree	The speaker(s) were easily heard Not sure	The speaker(s) were easily heard Disagree	The speaker(s) were easily heard Strongly disagree
The presentation was easily seen (for those in-person)	The presentation was easily seen (for those in-person) Strongly Agree	The presentation was easily seen (for those in-person) Agree	The presentation was easily seen (for those in-person) Not sure	The presentation was easily seen (for those in-person) Disagree	The presentation was easily seen (for those in-person) Strongly disagree

Question Title

* 4. What did you find most effective about the meeting (i.e., what aspects of the meeting were most successful)?

What did you find least effective about the meeting?

What suggestions do you have about how to improve the effectiveness of these meetings in the future?

Question Title

* 5. Given that Activity Based Costing (ABC) studies are used today by stewardship organizations and they will continue to be used in the future, would you be interested in learning more about these studies at our annual fall meeting?

Question Title

* 6. Overall, how would you rate this webinar?

Excellent

Very good

Good

Poor

Very Poor

Question Title

* 7. Pre-Read Document

In advance of the Proposed Fee Methodology Consultation meeting, CSSA distributed a pre-read document that provided information on the process used to develop the new methodology.

We would like to obtain some feedback on the pre-read document and invite you to submit any suggestions for future pre-reads.

Overall, how useful was the pre-read? Did it provide you with clear information on the new methodology, how it came about, next steps, etc.?

Extremely productive

Very productive

Somewhat productive

Not that productive

Not at all producitve

Question Title

* 8. What information in the pre-read did you find most useful and why?

Question Title

* 9. What contents in the pre-read did you find least useful and why?

Question Title

* 10. What information/contents were not included in the pre-read which you would like to see in future pre-reads?