Skip to content
Quick Survey: How Are Legal Teams Using AI in 2025?
1.
What is your current role
in-house counsel
law firm (associate or partner)
legal ops
startup founder or exec
Other (please specify)
2.
Have you used AI tools (e.g ChatGPT, Harvey, Spellbook, CoCounsel) to assist in legal work?
Yes, regularly
Occasionally
Tried once of twice
No yet, but planning to
No
3.
What kind of tasks have you used AI for? (multiple select)
Drafting full contracts
Generating specific clauses
Proofreading or editing drafts
Summarising legal documents
Understanding or translating legal language
Havent use AI for legal tasks
Other (please specify)
4.
How confident are you in the legal reliability of AI-generated content before human review?
Not confident at all
Sometimes
Roughly 50% of the time
Most of the time
Always
5.
Do you review all AI-generated legal content before using or sending it?
Always
Usually
Sometimes
Rarely
Never
6.
Have you ever found or heard of a critical issue in AI-generated legal output (e.g., missing clause, misused term, bad logic)?
Yes
Possibly, not sure
No
Not applicable
7.
If a legal document was generated or assisted by AI, how important would it be to confirm a human lawyer reviewed it?
Extremely important
Very important
Somewhat important
Not so important
Not at all important
8.
Do you or your team currently track or log who reviewed AI-assisted legal documents?
Yes, formally
Informally or in chat email
No
Not sure
None of the above
9.
Have you or your team ever experienced a situation where an AI generated legal document caused confusion, delay, or risk due to a mistake or omission?
Yes (it caused a real issue)
Maybe (it led to confusion or lack of confidence)
No (nothing serious)
Not applicable
10.
What, if anything, do you use to double-check the accuracy and completeness of AI-assisted legal documents?