ISOQOL 2020 Abstract Reviewer Survey

In an effort to ensure a balance between abstracts of theory, methods and application presented at the ISOQOL Annual Conference, a change to the primary abstract categories is being implemented for 2020.
 
Selection of Abstract Reviewers: To ensure that abstracts within each of the primary categories are fairly evaluated, abstract raters are asked to identify which primary and secondary categories reflect their areas of expertise. Your responses will be used to select appropriate abstracts for you to score.

For your reference in preparation for being a reviewer. Below is the abstract review criteria for which you will provide a rating (specifically for oral/brief/poster abstracts).
·         Importance of the problem being addressed
·         Innovation of the approach
·         Rigor of the approach
·         Clarity of the description of the work
·         Potential impact of the work described

Question Title

* 1. First Name:

Question Title

* 2. Last Name:

Question Title

* 3. Email address to receive abstracts for review:

Question Title

* 4. Type of abstracts to review (select a minimum of one, maximum of three)

Question Title

* 5. Select the primary category (+) which you feel is your area of expertise (select a minimum of one, maximum of three)

Question Title

* 6. Select the secondary category related to Health Conditions (minimum one, maximum three) where you have self-identified competency for reviewing.

Question Title

* 7. Select the secondary category related to Populations (minimum one, maximum three) where you have self-identified competency for reviewing.

Thank you for completing this survey! Workshop and symposia reviewers will receive instructions and assigned abstracts via email at the end of January. Oral/brief/poster reviewers will receive their instructions in late April.

T