INSTRUCTIONAL COURSE EVALUATION

IC 9: Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation Trials in Hemiparetic Cerebral Palsy: Making a Difference?
Bernadette Gillick, PhD, MSPT, PT; Kathleen Friel, PhD; Andrew Gordon, PhD; Yannick Bleyenheuft, PhD PT; Jason Carmel, MD, PhD

Learning Objective:
1) Participants will be able to recognize the varying forms of non-invasive brain stimulation
2) Participants will be familiar with the variable outcomes associated with non-invasive brain stimulation
3) Participants will be able to describe stimulation-related adverse events in case studies and clinical trials
4) Participants will be able to identify concurrent or complementary therapies and neuroimaging assessments related to stimulation trials

Question Title

* 1. Please indicate your opinion about each of the following statements.

  Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
The course followed description in the program.
The course began on time and was well paced.
The faculty communicated clearly and effectively.
The course used practical examples to teach points.
The faculty involved participants in the course.
The faculty allowed enough time for questions.
The course met its objectives as stated in the program.
The information presented will help me accomplish my professional responsibilities.
The course has given me a basis for making changes in my practice.

Question Title

* 2. Did this course have a commercial bias?

Question Title

* 3. Should the Academy repeat this course next year?

Question Title

* 4. Please suggest any topics of interest for a future course.

Question Title

* 5. General comments:

Thank you for taking the time to complete this evaluation. 
Your feedback is valued and greatly appreciated.

T