Sounds Great Conference Evaluation

 
Sounds Great Conference Follow Up

Please take some time to complete this evaluation of the 2013 Sounds Great Conference. Your comments freely given are actively encouraged and will assist in the planning of future conferences.

If you have already completed a paper evaluation at the conference - thank you! However, you are welcome to complete this evaluation as well.

There are 17 questions.

Question Title

1. Please indicate the school system in which you teach.

Question Title

2. Please indicate your region.

Question Title

3. Have you been to a previous Sounds Great Conference

Question Title

4. Which day(s) did you attend?

Question Title

5. List your three best experiences of this conference

Question Title

6. List three ideas that will assist in the planning of the next Sounds Great Conference.

Question Title

7. Keynote Session Review. Please use the rating scale with left as the least satisfactory and right being the most satisfactory.

  1 Least 2 3 4 5 Most N/A
1. Richard Gill
2. Danny Lane and Karen Kyriakou
3. Daphne Proietto
4. Michael Grifin
5. Tim McDonald

Question Title

8. Workshop Session A: I attended:

Question Title

9. Workshop Session B: I attended:

Question Title

10. Workshop Session C: I attended:

Question Title

11. Workshop Session D: I attended:

Question Title

12. Workshop Session E: I attended:

Question Title

13. Workshop Session F: I attended:

Question Title

14. Workshop Session G: I attended:

Question Title

15. Workshop Session H: I attended:

Question Title

16. Workshop Session H: I attended:

Question Title

17. Please rate your experience at this conference, with the left side being the least satisfactory and the right being the most satisfactory.

  Least Most N/A
Venue
Catering
Presenters
Pre-conference reception
Q&A
Conference Anthem
Performances
Trade exhibition
Pre-conference communication

Question Title

18. Additional comments

T