Skip to content
2026 Mulsant-Pollock Research Day Feedback Survey
PART 1: Program Evaluation
1.
The conference met the stated learning objectives
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Objective 1: After active engagement in this program, participants will be able to contribute to the Department’s variety of mental health research advances.
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Objective 2: After active engagement in this program, participants will be able to develop and continue to present to colleagues innovative activities or original research, either in progress or completed.
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Objective 3: Active engagement in this program helped build a sense of community amongst our department members by bringing academic and practicing clinicians, residents, graduate students, researchers and administrators working in psychiatry together.
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Objective 4: After active engagement in this program, participants will develop and share their clinical expertise and research skills through oral and poster presentations and through the informal exchange of information among peers.
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
2.
Please rate the following aspects of the conference:
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Was relevant to my discipline/profession
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Met my expectations
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Was well organized
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest was clearly communicated
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
There were adequate opportunities to interact with my peers
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
I will use the information I learned in my practice
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
3.
Did you perceive any degree of bias in any part of the conference?
Yes
No
If yes, what kind of bias was identified?
4.
Did you find that the conference was accessible?
Yes
No
If no, please specify
5.
Did you find that the conference was inclusive?
Yes
No
If no, please specify
The conference will encourage me to consider changes in my current practice
6.
YES, The changes I am considering are:
7.
NO, because:
I do not see the need to make changes to my current practice.
I am thinking about changes and have the necessary resources but not ready to make them yet
I am already implementing recommended practices
The information was not relevant to me
I do not have the required resources to implement these changes
8.
What suggestions do you have for improving the conference
9.
Please list any topics you would like to see addressed in future conference
10.
For physicians only: please indicate which CanMEDS/CanMEDS-FM roles you felt were addressed during this conference
Medical Expert/Family Medicine Expert
Scholar
Collaborator
Communicator
Leader
Professional
Health Advocate
PART 2: Session Evaluation
11.
Please assess the keynote speaker and plenary session presenters by choosing the appropriate number. ( 1 = Poor 2 = Fair 3 = Good 4 = Very Good 5 = Outstanding)
Met Stated Objectives
Content Enhanced My Knowledge
Balanced & Unbiased
Relevance to Practice Overall
Time for Active Learning
Dr. Belinda Lennox (Keynote)
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Dr. George Fousiass
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Dr. Lindsay Oliver
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Dr. Robert Kleinman
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Dr. Juveria Zaheer
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Dr. Rodrigo Mansur
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
12.
Please assess the poster presentations session by choosing the appropriate number. ( 1 = Poor 2 = Fair 3 = Good 4 = Very Good 5 = Outstanding)
Met Stated Objectives
Content Enhanced My Knowledge
Balanced & Unbiased
Relevance to Practice Overall
Time for Active Learning
Poster Viewing Session
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
13.
Please assess afternoon oral presentations and presenters for sessions you attended by choosing the appropriate number. ( 1 = Poor 2 = Fair 3 = Good 4 = Very Good 5 = Outstanding
Clarity of Oral Presentation
Clarity of Visual Presentation
Balanced & Unbiased
Relevant to Practice Overall
Time for Active Learning
June Lam
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Martin Rotenberg
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Jeanette Hui
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Safana AlFardan
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Andrea Lebovic
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Avra Selick
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Kimberley Tsujimoto
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Mehwish Rana
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Vivian Mohn
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Jennie Pouget
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Simin Jin
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Diana Orsini
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Omer Syed
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Reinhard Janssen Aguilar
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Ayesha Rashidi
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Robert Zipursky
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Catriona Wong
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Jithin Joseph
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Semir Bulle
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Naser Alfodari
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Laura Rivera
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Valentina Tamayo Velasquez
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Mohammed Amin Kamaleddin
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Akash Goel
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Katie Göke
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Sandalia Genus
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Danielle Bukovsky
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Dana Ross
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Tesam Ahmed
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Nidhi Kulkarni
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Hadar Sadeh
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Jasmine Amini
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Jennifer Yu
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Natalie Chiang
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Christina Pereira
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Colin Hawco
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Enoch Ng
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Sarah Smith
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Aimee Virginia Fermin Olivares
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Mohammad Chaposhloo
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Andreaa Chiroean
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Anna Mouzenian
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Caleb Browne
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Dhvani Mehta
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Jiya Shah
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Rubab Shafiq
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
PART 3: Conference Logistics
14.
Please rate the following aspects of the conference:
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
The registration process was easy to use
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
The abstract submission process was intuitive and easy to use
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Information about the conference on the website was useful
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
The venue met my expectations
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
The food met my expectations
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
PART 4: About You
15.
Department Affiliation
Faculty
Resident
Fellow
Graduate Student
Other (please specify)
16.
How did you find out about Research Day
Email notification or listserv announcement
Department of Psychiatry Website
CPD Website
Notice in Hospital
Other (please specify)
