NASMHPD Annual 2019 Commissioners Meeting
Evaluation Survey
1.
My primary affiliation is:
SMHA Commissioner/Director
SMHA Staff (other than Commissioner/Director)
National Association Representative
Federal Staff
Consumer/Family Member
Other
2.
If you are a NASMHPD Division Member, please specify:
Children, Youth and Families Division
Older Persons Division
Medical Directors Division
Legal Division
Forensic Division
Recovery Services and Supports Division
Finance and Policy Division
Other
3.
How would you rate the quality of the following Thursday NASMHPD Innovations Showcase sessions (if attended)?
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Best Practices in School Mental Health for At-Risk Youth and Paths to Treatment
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Crisis Now: The Human and Business Case for Building a Comprehensive Crisis Services System
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Treatment Interventions to Enhance the Treatment of Suicide in Acute Care Inpatient Psychiatric Hospitals and Residential Crisis Programs
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Cognitive Recovery Therapy (CT-R): Long Lengths of Stay to Thriving in the Community
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
The Use of Clozapine for Thriving in the Community
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
4.
How would you rate the quality of Friday's NASMHPD Innovations Showcase sessions (if attended)?
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Beyond the Borders: Lessons from the International Community to Improve Mental Health Outcomes
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Head Trauma in Youth and the Link with Serious Mental Illness and Substance Use Disorders
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Addressing Intersecting Social and Mental Health Needs among Transition-Aged Homeless Youth
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Integrated Systems and Services for People with CoOccurring Mental Health and Substance Use Conditions: What’s Known, What’s New, and What’s Now?
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Crisis Systems from a Public Health Perspective, for All Payers
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Older Adult Focus: Effects of CMS’ Measure of Antipsychotic Prescribing Practices for Nursing Facilities
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Workforce and Serious Mental Illness and Substance Use Disorders
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
5.
How would you rate the quality of the following Saturday sessions (if attended)?
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
National Mental Health Technology Transfer Centers: National American Indian and Alaska Native ATTC, MHTTC & PTTC; National Hispanic and Latino MHTTC; and the MHTTC Network Coordinating Office
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Saving Lives by Reducing Tobacco Use
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Commissioner Priorities and Potential Areas of Collaboration Across Divisions
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Lunch Presentation: Data, Technology, and Analytics
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
6.
How would you rate the quality of the following presentations in the Saturday afternoon Commissioners Breakout Session (if attended)?
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
National Suicide Prevention Lifeline
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Supported Employment Demonstration
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Science to Service: Improving Care for Early Psychosis
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
El Paso, Texas Tragedy: Lessons in Disaster Behavioral Health Preparedness
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
7.
How would you rate the quality of the following Saturday afternoon Division Breakout Sessions (if attended)?
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Children, Youth and Families Division Breakout Session
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Older Persons Division Breakout Session
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Finance and Policy Division Breakout Session
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Forensic, Legal, and Medical Directors Divisions Breakout Session
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Recovery Services and Supports Division Breakout Session
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
8.
How would you rate the quality of the following?
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Overall meeting
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Topics covered
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Quality of presenters
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Conference Facility
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
Hotel sleeping rooms
1 (poor)
2
3
4
5 (excellent)
9.
What did you like
most
about the meeting?
10.
What did you like
least
about the meeting?
11.
Did you find value in the joint Commissioners and Divisions Meeting?
12.
Did you find value in the joint meeting with IIMHL?
13.
Recommendations for future meetings: