Skip to content

American Auditory Society - 2025 Meeting Evaluation

1.Name:
2.Are you an AAS member?
3.Please indicate if you are a:
4.Are you or have you been involved in research?
5.Which professional area most accurately represents your interests?
6.How would you rate the SCIENTIFIC CONTENT of this conference?
Outstanding
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
N/A
Overall meeting
Podium Sessions
Poster Sessions
Technology Updates
7.How would you rate the Quality of the Translational Research Presentations:
Outstanding
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
N/A
Ross Maddox, PhD
Pamela Souza, PhD
Lauren Calandruccio, PhD, CCC-A
8.How would you rate the Quality of the Special Session Presentations:
Outstanding
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
N/A
O’neil W. Guthrie, MS, PhD, CCC-A
Emma J. Kagel, JD, MBE, HCE-C, LPEC
Marci M. Lesperance, MD
Keiko Hirose, MD
Sharon L. Cushing, MD
Ryan McCreery, PhD
9.How would you rate the SPECIAL FORUMS?
Outstanding
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
N/A
Industry Research Consortium Special Session
Carhart Lecture: Kathy Pichora-Fuller, PhD, FCAHS
Early Career Research Award Presentation: Gabrielle R. Merchant, AuD, PhD
Mentoring Research Projects: Strategies for Mentors and Mentees
10.To what extent do you feel the following sessions contributed to the overall quality of the scientific meeting?
Outstanding
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
N/A
Mentored Student Presentations
T35 Student Presentations
11.How would you rate the ORGANIZATION?
Outstanding
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
N/A
Meeting Place
Hotel Accommodations
Audiovisual Services
Registration Process
12.How would you rate the OVERALL MEETING CONTENT?
Outstanding
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
N/A
Content consistent with publicity
Appropriate level of difficulty at meeting
Activities facilitated learning
I would attend this meeting next year
13.How would you rate the IMPLEMENTATION?
Outstanding
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
N/A
Sufficient advance notice of meeting
Physical facilities conducive to learning
Convenient scheduling (day, time, month)
Sufficient information of meeting content
Adequate time for various presentations
14.How would you rate the PRESENTATIONS?
Outstanding
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
N/A
Teaching aids were appropriate
Presenters used time efficiently
Presenters were prepared & interesting
Presenters' styles conducive to learning
Information presented was useful
15.How would you rate the SELF-ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING?
Outstanding
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
N/A
Interest in hearing related issues increased
Acquired new and/or useful information
Increased my knowledge and/or skills
Will apply knowledge/skills to work
Meeting contributed to professional growth
16.How do you intend to use the information gathered from this meeting:
17.Identify one way that your practice will change or be enhanced as a result of attending this meeting:
18.Please provide any suggestions you have for format changes or invited speakers for future meetings:
19.Please provide any suggestions you have for future Carhart Lectures and Lifetime Achievement Awards:
20.Do you have any other suggestions or comments regarding the AAS annual meeting?