American Auditory Society - 2021 NIH Questionnaire Question Title * 1. Rate the Quality of the Translational Research Presentations: 5: Excellent 4: Very Good 3: Good 2: Fair 1: Poor Did Not Attend Jessica R. Sullivan Jessica R. Sullivan 5: Excellent Jessica R. Sullivan 4: Very Good Jessica R. Sullivan 3: Good Jessica R. Sullivan 2: Fair Jessica R. Sullivan 1: Poor Jessica R. Sullivan Did Not Attend De Wet Swanepoel De Wet Swanepoel 5: Excellent De Wet Swanepoel 4: Very Good De Wet Swanepoel 3: Good De Wet Swanepoel 2: Fair De Wet Swanepoel 1: Poor De Wet Swanepoel Did Not Attend Simon Carlile Simon Carlile 5: Excellent Simon Carlile 4: Very Good Simon Carlile 3: Good Simon Carlile 2: Fair Simon Carlile 1: Poor Simon Carlile Did Not Attend Question Title * 2. Rate the Quality of Special Session Presentations: 5: Excellent 4: Very Good 3: Good 2: Fair 1: Poor Did Not Attend Aniruddh D. Patel Aniruddh D. Patel 5: Excellent Aniruddh D. Patel 4: Very Good Aniruddh D. Patel 3: Good Aniruddh D. Patel 2: Fair Aniruddh D. Patel 1: Poor Aniruddh D. Patel Did Not Attend Nina Kraus Nina Kraus 5: Excellent Nina Kraus 4: Very Good Nina Kraus 3: Good Nina Kraus 2: Fair Nina Kraus 1: Poor Nina Kraus Did Not Attend Laurel Trainor Laurel Trainor 5: Excellent Laurel Trainor 4: Very Good Laurel Trainor 3: Good Laurel Trainor 2: Fair Laurel Trainor 1: Poor Laurel Trainor Did Not Attend Charles J. Limb Charles J. Limb 5: Excellent Charles J. Limb 4: Very Good Charles J. Limb 3: Good Charles J. Limb 2: Fair Charles J. Limb 1: Poor Charles J. Limb Did Not Attend Question Title * 3. To what extent do you feel the following sessions contributed to the overall quality of the scientific meeting? 5: Excellent 4: Very Good 3: Good 2: Fair 1: Poor Did Not Attend Mentored Student Presentations Mentored Student Presentations 5: Excellent Mentored Student Presentations 4: Very Good Mentored Student Presentations 3: Good Mentored Student Presentations 2: Fair Mentored Student Presentations 1: Poor Mentored Student Presentations Did Not Attend Young Investigator: Nicholas S. Reed Young Investigator: Nicholas S. Reed 5: Excellent Young Investigator: Nicholas S. Reed 4: Very Good Young Investigator: Nicholas S. Reed 3: Good Young Investigator: Nicholas S. Reed 2: Fair Young Investigator: Nicholas S. Reed 1: Poor Young Investigator: Nicholas S. Reed Did Not Attend T35 Student Presentations T35 Student Presentations 5: Excellent T35 Student Presentations 4: Very Good T35 Student Presentations 3: Good T35 Student Presentations 2: Fair T35 Student Presentations 1: Poor T35 Student Presentations Did Not Attend Question Title * 4. Please provide any suggestions you have for format changes or invited speakers for future meetings: Question Title * 5. Please provide any suggestions you have for future Carhart Lectures and Lifetime Achievement Awards: Done