Skip to content
OB-Gyn Near Misses Case Conference Grand Rounds,February 6, 2019
Javier Gonzalez, MD; Gabrielle Whitmore, MD; Lindsay Wheeler, MD
1.
Evaluate each of these aspects of Dr. Gonzalez's Near Miss Grand Rounds talk (1 poor, to 5 excellent):
1 (Poor)
2
3 (Good)
4
5 (Excellent)
Delivery: communication and presentation
1 (Poor)
2
3 (Good)
4
5 (Excellent)
Content: quality of evidence and analysis
1 (Poor)
2
3 (Good)
4
5 (Excellent)
Content: addressed important QI issue
1 (Poor)
2
3 (Good)
4
5 (Excellent)
Content: suggested or developed useful QI approaches
1 (Poor)
2
3 (Good)
4
5 (Excellent)
Relevance: clinical care and practice
1 (Poor)
2
3 (Good)
4
5 (Excellent)
Discussion: questions and answers
1 (Poor)
2
3 (Good)
4
5 (Excellent)
2.
For Dr. Gonzalez's Lecture: How would you rate this educational activity overall?
Outstanding
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
3.
Strong points of Dr. Gonzalez's presentation:
4.
Suggestions for improving Dr. Gonzalez's presentation:
5.
Other observations or comments for Dr. Gonzalez:
6.
Evaluate each of these aspects of Dr. Whitmore's Near Miss Grand Rounds talk (1 poor, to 5 excellent):
1 (Poor)
2
3 (Good)
4
5 (Excellent)
Delivery: communication and presentation
1 (Poor)
2
3 (Good)
4
5 (Excellent)
Content: quality of evidence and analysis
1 (Poor)
2
3 (Good)
4
5 (Excellent)
Content: addressed important QI issue
1 (Poor)
2
3 (Good)
4
5 (Excellent)
Content: suggested or developed useful QI approaches
1 (Poor)
2
3 (Good)
4
5 (Excellent)
Relevance: clinical care and practice
1 (Poor)
2
3 (Good)
4
5 (Excellent)
Discussion: questions and answers
1 (Poor)
2
3 (Good)
4
5 (Excellent)
7.
For Dr. Whitmore's Lecture: How would you rate this educational activity overall?
Outstanding
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
8.
Strong points of Dr. Whitmore's presentation:
9.
Suggestions for improving Dr. Whitmore's presentation:
10.
Other observations or comments for Dr. Whitmore:
11.
Evaluate each of these aspects of Dr. Wheeler's Near Miss Grand Rounds talk (1 poor, to 5 excellent):
1 (Poor)
2
3 (Good)
4
5 (Excellent)
Delivery: communication and presentation
1 (Poor)
2
3 (Good)
4
5 (Excellent)
Content: quality of evidence and analysis
1 (Poor)
2
3 (Good)
4
5 (Excellent)
Content: addressed important QI issue
1 (Poor)
2
3 (Good)
4
5 (Excellent)
Content: suggested or developed useful QI approaches
1 (Poor)
2
3 (Good)
4
5 (Excellent)
Relevance: clinical care and practice
1 (Poor)
2
3 (Good)
4
5 (Excellent)
Discussion: questions and answers
1 (Poor)
2
3 (Good)
4
5 (Excellent)
12.
For Dr. Wheeler's Lecture: How would you rate this educational activity overall?
Outstanding
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
13.
Strong points of Dr. Wheeler's presentation:
14.
Suggestions for improving Dr. Wheeler's presentation:
15.
Other observations or comments for Dr. Wheeler: