78th MASSACHUSETTS THORACIC SOCIETY MEETING

Course and Speaker Evaluation

April 10TH, 2025

Mass General Brigham Conference Center
399 Revolution Drive
Assembly Row, Sommerville, Ma, 02145

1.Full Name (as you would like to appear on the certificate)
2.Your overall program evaluation (Please check only one box):
3.Content (Please check only one box):
4.Adherence to Meeting Objectives (Please check only one box ):
5.Meeting Venue (Please check only one box):
6.Please provide at least one suggestion for improving this program.
7.Please provide at least one topic you would like covered at future conferences. Tell us what improvement in your practice you hope to make that prompted you to suggest the topic.
8.Please circle your Profession:
9.Please circle your area of Specialty:
10.Please grade each speaker using the following scale:
11.Advances in Clinical Research in COPD/Pulm Fibrosis
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strngly Disagree
N/A not applicable
Speaker made a clear & well-organized presentation
Presentation met the identified objectives
Presentation was relevant to my practice
Information provided will cause me to make changes in my practice
Presentation was scientifically rigorous and balanced
Presentation was free from commercial bias
12.Updates in ECMO 2025
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strngly Disagree
N/A not applicable
Speaker made a clear & well-organized presentation
Presentation met the identified objectives
Presentation was relevant to my practice
Information provided will cause me to make changes in my practice
Presentation was scientifically rigorous and balanced
Presentation was free from commercial bias
13.Rising Star
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strngly Disagree
N/A not applicable
Speaker made a clear & well-organized presentation
Presentation met the identified objectives
Presentation was relevant to my practice
Information provided will cause me to make changes in my practice
Presentation was scientifically rigorous and balanced
Presentation was free from commercial bias
14.L. Jack Faling Best cases:
Case: 1
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strngly Disagree
N/A not applicable
Speaker made a clear & well-organized presentation
Presentation met the identified objectives
Presentation was relevant to my practice
Information provided will cause me to make changes in my practice
Presentation was scientifically rigorous and balanced
Presentation was free from commercial bias
15.L. Jack Faling Best cases:
Case: 2
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strngly Disagree
N/A not applicable
Speaker made a clear & well-organized presentation
Presentation met the identified objectives
Presentation was relevant to my practice
Information provided will cause me to make changes in my practice
Presentation was scientifically rigorous and balanced
Presentation was free from commercial bias
16.L. Jack Faling Best cases:
Case: 3
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strngly Disagree
N/A not applicable
Speaker made a clear & well-organized presentation
Presentation met the identified objectives
Presentation was relevant to my practice
Information provided will cause me to make changes in my practice
Presentation was scientifically rigorous and balanced
Presentation was free from commercial bias
17.Stem Cells and Lung Regeneration: "What Every Pulmonologist Should Know”
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strngly Disagree
N/A not applicable
Speaker made a clear & well-organized presentation
Presentation met the identified objectives
Presentation was relevant to my practice
Information provided will cause me to make changes in my practice
Presentation was scientifically rigorous and balanced
Presentation was free from commercial bias
18.Chadwick Intro and Talk
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strngly Disagree
N/A not applicable
Speaker made a clear & well-organized presentation
Presentation met the identified objectives
Presentation was relevant to my practice
Information provided will cause me to make changes in my practice
Presentation was scientifically rigorous and balanced
Presentation was free from commercial bias
19.Advocacy Session:
How can we advocate for policies to improve our patients’ health?
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strngly Disagree
N/A not applicable
Speaker made a clear & well-organized presentation
Presentation met the identified objectives
Presentation was relevant to my practice
Information provided will cause me to make changes in my practice
Presentation was scientifically rigorous and balanced
Presentation was free from commercial bias
20.PERT panel – Incorporating evidence into management of Intermediate Risk Pulmonary Embolism
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strngly Disagree
N/A not applicable
Speaker made a clear & well-organized presentation
Presentation met the identified objectives
Presentation was relevant to my practice
Information provided will cause me to make changes in my practice
Presentation was scientifically rigorous and balanced
Presentation was free from commercial bias
21.Did the educational format of the MTS meeting enhance your medical knowledge of the latest advances and emerging concepts in pulmonary and critical care medicine?
22.Do you intend to make changes to your practice as a result of participating in this activity? (Yes or No)