April 10TH, 2025

Mass General Brigham Conference Center
399 Revolution Drive
Assembly Row, Sommerville, Ma, 02145

Question Title

* 1. Full Name (as you would like to appear on the certificate)

Question Title

* 2. Your overall program evaluation (Please check only one box):

Question Title

* 3. Content (Please check only one box):

Question Title

* 4. Adherence to Meeting Objectives (Please check only one box ):

Question Title

* 5. Meeting Venue (Please check only one box):

Question Title

* 6. Please provide at least one suggestion for improving this program.

Question Title

* 7. Please provide at least one topic you would like covered at future conferences. Tell us what improvement in your practice you hope to make that prompted you to suggest the topic.

Question Title

* 8. Please circle your Profession:

Question Title

* 9. Please circle your area of Specialty:

Question Title

* 10. Please grade each speaker using the following scale:

Question Title

* 11. Advances in Clinical Research in COPD/Pulm Fibrosis

  Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strngly Disagree N/A not applicable
Speaker made a clear & well-organized presentation
Presentation met the identified objectives
Presentation was relevant to my practice
Information provided will cause me to make changes in my practice
Presentation was scientifically rigorous and balanced
Presentation was free from commercial bias

Question Title

* 12. Updates in ECMO 2025

  Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strngly Disagree N/A not applicable
Speaker made a clear & well-organized presentation
Presentation met the identified objectives
Presentation was relevant to my practice
Information provided will cause me to make changes in my practice
Presentation was scientifically rigorous and balanced
Presentation was free from commercial bias

Question Title

* 13. Rising Star

  Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strngly Disagree N/A not applicable
Speaker made a clear & well-organized presentation
Presentation met the identified objectives
Presentation was relevant to my practice
Information provided will cause me to make changes in my practice
Presentation was scientifically rigorous and balanced
Presentation was free from commercial bias

Question Title

* 14. L. Jack Faling Best cases:
Case: 1

  Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strngly Disagree N/A not applicable
Speaker made a clear & well-organized presentation
Presentation met the identified objectives
Presentation was relevant to my practice
Information provided will cause me to make changes in my practice
Presentation was scientifically rigorous and balanced
Presentation was free from commercial bias

Question Title

* 15. L. Jack Faling Best cases:
Case: 2

  Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strngly Disagree N/A not applicable
Speaker made a clear & well-organized presentation
Presentation met the identified objectives
Presentation was relevant to my practice
Information provided will cause me to make changes in my practice
Presentation was scientifically rigorous and balanced
Presentation was free from commercial bias

Question Title

* 16. L. Jack Faling Best cases:
Case: 3

  Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strngly Disagree N/A not applicable
Speaker made a clear & well-organized presentation
Presentation met the identified objectives
Presentation was relevant to my practice
Information provided will cause me to make changes in my practice
Presentation was scientifically rigorous and balanced
Presentation was free from commercial bias

Question Title

* 17. Stem Cells and Lung Regeneration: "What Every Pulmonologist Should Know”

  Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strngly Disagree N/A not applicable
Speaker made a clear & well-organized presentation
Presentation met the identified objectives
Presentation was relevant to my practice
Information provided will cause me to make changes in my practice
Presentation was scientifically rigorous and balanced
Presentation was free from commercial bias

Question Title

* 18. Chadwick Intro and Talk

  Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strngly Disagree N/A not applicable
Speaker made a clear & well-organized presentation
Presentation met the identified objectives
Presentation was relevant to my practice
Information provided will cause me to make changes in my practice
Presentation was scientifically rigorous and balanced
Presentation was free from commercial bias

Question Title

* 19. Advocacy Session:
How can we advocate for policies to improve our patients’ health?

  Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strngly Disagree N/A not applicable
Speaker made a clear & well-organized presentation
Presentation met the identified objectives
Presentation was relevant to my practice
Information provided will cause me to make changes in my practice
Presentation was scientifically rigorous and balanced
Presentation was free from commercial bias

Question Title

* 20. PERT panel – Incorporating evidence into management of Intermediate Risk Pulmonary Embolism

  Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strngly Disagree N/A not applicable
Speaker made a clear & well-organized presentation
Presentation met the identified objectives
Presentation was relevant to my practice
Information provided will cause me to make changes in my practice
Presentation was scientifically rigorous and balanced
Presentation was free from commercial bias

Question Title

* 21. Did the educational format of the MTS meeting enhance your medical knowledge of the latest advances and emerging concepts in pulmonary and critical care medicine?

Question Title

* 22. Do you intend to make changes to your practice as a result of participating in this activity? (Yes or No)

T