Skip to content

NPA Fall Conference – "Social Connection, Risk, and Resilience Across Contemporary Clinical Contexts"

Thank you for participating in NPA's 2026 Fall Conference "Social Connection, Risk, and Resilience Across Contemporary Clinical Contexts". Your input is very valuable and appreciated. Thank you for taking the time to complete our event evaluation survey!
1.I attended the Fall Conference…(Required.)
2.Are you a member of the Nebraska Psychological Association?(Required.)
3.Are you a…(Required.)
4.How did you learn about this Conference?(Required.)
5.For in-person attendees: If you were able to visit the student poster session, please indicate which posters you viewed.
6.How would you rate your overall experience with the student poster session?(Required.)
Poor
Fair
Adequate
Very Good
High/Excellent
7.Conference Logistics(Required.)
Low/Poor (1)
Fair (2)
Adequate (3)
Very Good (4)
High/Excellent (5)
1. Registration process
2. Quality/clarity of audio
3. Quality/clarity of video
4. Ease/ability to ask questions
5. Ease/ability to join the webinar
8.Conference Content(Required.)
Low/Poor (1)
Fair (2)
Adequate (3)
Very Good (4)
High/Excellent (5)
1. Relevance of material
2. Organization of material
3. Completeness of coverage
4. Usefulness of slides/handouts
9.Conference presenter - Matt Genuchi, PhD(Required.)
Low/Poor (1)
Fair (2)
Adequate (3)
Very Good (4)
High/Excellent (5)
1. Organization of material
2. Attitude toward subject
3. Knowledge of subject
4. Speaking ability
5. Effectiveness of presentation
6. Overall rating of presenter
10.Conference presenter - Cara Solness, PhD(Required.)
Low/Poor (1)
Fair (2)
Adequate (3)
Very Good (4)
High/Excellent (5)
1. Organization of material
2. Attitude toward subject
3. Knowledge of subject
4. Speaking ability
5. Effectiveness of presentation
6. Overall rating of presenter
11.Conference presenter - Catie Carney, PhD(Required.)
Low/Poor (1)
Fair (2)
Adequate (3)
Very Good (4)
High/Excellent (5)
1. Organization of material
2. Attitude toward subject
3. Knowledge of subject
4. Speaking ability
5. Effectiveness of presentation
6. Overall rating of presenter
12.Conference presenter - Justin Weeks PhD(Required.)
Low/Poor (1)
Fair (2)
Adequate (3)
Very Good (4)
High/Excellent (5)
1. Organization of material
2. Attitude toward subject
3. Knowledge of subject
4. Speaking ability
5. Effectiveness of presentation
6. Overall rating of presenter
13.Learning Objectives: Using the scale 1) Strongly Disagree — 5) Strongly Agree, please respond to the statements below:(Required.)
Strongly Disagree (1)
Disagree (2)
Neutral (3)
Agree (4)
Strongly Agree (5)
1. Describe popular and empirical conceptions of masculinities in the United States.
2. Describe the leading causes of death and premature mortality for men in the United States.
3. Identify risk factors for a range of men’s mental health concerns, such as attitudes towards help seeking, engagement with the manosphere, and social disconnection/isolation.
4. Identify three resources to support men’s mental health and increase clinical competence in working with men in mental health care settings.
5. Identify common psychological sequelae of NICU admission, including depression, anxiety, traumatic stress, loneliness, and disruptions in attachment and parental role development.
6. Describe how social acceptance and school climate interact to influence psychosocial outcomes for youth involved in the bullying dynamic.
7. Describe evidence-informed psychological interventions and systems-level practices that promote family connection, support parental mental health, and optimize developmental outcomes for infants and families following NICU admission.
8. Formulate social-ecological interventions that leverage social connection and inclusive school climates to mitigate risk associated with bullying involvement across diverse student groups.
9. Define social anxiety disorder (SAD) and perfectionism.
10. Identify diversity issues regarding SAD and perfectionism; for example, culture-specific presentations of SAD (e.g., taijin kyofusho; aymat zibur, etc.), and perfectionism within these contexts.
11. Discuss the practical implications and effects of the overlap between social anxiety and perfectionism for assessing, conceptualizing, diagnosing, and treating SAD.
14.How much did you learn as a result of this conference?(Required.)
Very Little (1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Great Deal (5)
15.How useful was the content of this conference for your practice or other professional development(Required.)
Not useful (1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Very Useful (5)
16.What TOPICS would you like covered/discussed in an NPA education event?
17.What PRESENTERS would you recommend?
18.Are you interested in working with NPA's CE Committee in planning CE events – selecting and reviewing programs, presenters, etc.? (If yes, please provide name and contact information.)
19.Are you interested in working with other NPA committees?
(Please check all that apply, and provide name and contact information.)
Privacy & Cookie Notice