Skip to content
NNECOS 2025 Annual Meeting & Palliative Care Symposium
*
Name:
(Required.)
Credentials/Degree
Practice/Organization
Years in practice:
Practice Setting
Community
Academic
I am a (select one):
Physician
Fellow
Resident Physician
PA
NP
RN
PharmD
Social Worker
Medical Student
Other (please specify)
Email (where we'll send your continuing education certificate)
*ALL FIELDS IN THIS SECTION REQUIRED FOR MOC
ABIM or NAPB ID:
DOB - required for MOC/ACPE Credit
QUALITY OF INSTRUCTION:
(if multiple presenters, evaluate the following for each speaker/presenter individually)
Palliative Care Symposium
Session #1 - Assessing Cognitive Health: Screening for Cognitive Changes in Cancer Patients - Heather Wishart, PhD
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Free of commercial bias
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Evidence-based
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Presentation met the stated objectives
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Please share any comments.
Session #2 - Anxiolytics and Antidepressants in Cancer Care: Managing Anxiety, Fear, and Depression in Patients with Cancer - Terry Rabinowitz, MD
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Free of commercial bias
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Evidence-based
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Presentation met the stated objectives
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Please share any comments.
Session #3 - Screening for Substance Misuse Disorder in Cancer Patients: Identifying and Addressing Risk - Kathleen Broglio DNP, ANP-BC, ACHPN, CPE, FPCN, FAANP
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Free of commercial bias
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Evidence-based
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Presentation met the stated objectives
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Please share any comments.
Session #4 - Finding Rest: Supporting Cancer Patients Struggling with Insomnia - Lisa St. Pierre, MSN, PMHNP
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Free of commercial bias
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Evidence-based
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Presentation met the stated objectives
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Please share any comments.
Annual Meeting - Friday
Session #5 - Caregiver Support- “Behind the scenes” how can we best support our patient’s caregivers? - Maija Reblin, PhD
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Free of commercial bias
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Evidence-based
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Presentation met the stated objectives
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Please share any comments.
Session #6 - Bispecifics and Solid Tumors – An update as these treatments enter the clinic more and more.
David Qualls
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Free of commercial bias
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Evidence-based
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Presentation met the stated objectives
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Please share any comments.
Yoni Resnick
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Free of commercial bias
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Evidence-based
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Presentation met the stated objectives
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Please share any comments.
ABSTRACT PODIUM PRESENTATION #1 - Predicting tarlatamab response in small cell carcinoma - Zofia Cieslak, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Free of commercial bias
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Evidence-based
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Presentation met the stated objectives
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Please share any comments.
CONCURRENT SESSIONS
CONCURRENT SESSION #7 - Physician Burnout and Time Management – Fitting it all in, strategies to care for patients and yourself. - Diane Shannon, MD
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Free of commercial bias
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Evidence-based
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Presentation met the stated objectives
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Please share any comments
CONCURRENT SESSION #7 - Dermatologic Toxicities
Ashleigh Eberly Puleo, PA-C
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Free of commercial bias
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Evidence-based
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Presentation met the stated objectives
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Please share any comments.
Suzanne MacRae, RN
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Free of commercial bias
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Evidence-based
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Presentation met the stated objectives
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Please share any comments.
SESSION #8 - Environmental Exposures – Digging into the data, how accurately to talk about exposures with patients.
Christine M Gunn, MA
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Free of commercial bias
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Evidence-based
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Presentation met the stated objectives
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Please share any comments.
Megan E. Romano, PhD
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Free of commercial bias
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Evidence-based
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Presentation met the stated objectives
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Please share any comments.
Annual Meeting - Saturday
GRUNBERG KEYNOTE SESSION #9 - Grunberg Keynote - AI in Oncology –
It’s here whether we like it or not, harnessing AI for better patient care. - Andrew Hantel, MD
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Free of commercial bias
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Evidence-based
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Presentation met the stated objectives
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Please share any comments.
Abstract Podium Presentation #2 - Clinical Application of Targeted Deep Sequencing in Multiple Myeloma: A Multi- Institutional Experience - Rutu Vyas, MPH -
presented by Parth Shah, MD
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Free of commercial bias
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Evidence-based
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Presentation met the stated objectives
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Please share any comments.
SESSION #10 - Evolving multidisciplinary treatment paradigms in oncology -Clayton Smith, MD
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Free of commercial bias
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Evidence-based
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Presentation met the stated objectives
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Please share any comments.
CONCURRENT SESSIONS
CONCURRENT SESSION #11 - Iron Revolution: Updates in diagnosis and management in iron deficiency -Hande H .Tuncer, MD
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Free of commercial bias
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Evidence-based
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Presentation met the stated objectives
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Please share any comments.
CONCURRENT SESSION #11 - Ins and Outs of Pelvic Therapy -
Jill Cramp PT, DPT, PRPC, WCS
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Free of commercial bias
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Evidence-based
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Presentation met the stated objectives
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Please share any comments.
SESSION #12 -Rectal Cancer Tumor Board – The changing landscape of treating rectal cancer
Sara W. Mayo MD, MS, FACS, FASCRS
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Free of commercial bias
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Evidence-based
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Presentation met the stated objectives
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Please share any comments.
Nicholas Jensen, MS, LCGC
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Free of commercial bias
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Evidence-based
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Presentation met the stated objectives
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Please share any comments.
Jill Cramp PT, DPT, PRPC, WCS
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Free of commercial bias
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Evidence-based
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Presentation met the stated objectives
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Please share any comments.
Clayton Smith, MD
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Free of commercial bias
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Evidence-based
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Presentation met the stated objectives
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Please share any comments
Michele Mosley, MSW, LICSW
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Free of commercial bias
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Evidence-based
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Presentation met the stated objectives
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Please share any comments.
Sarah Gillett, MD, PhD
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Free of commercial bias
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Evidence-based
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Presentation met the stated objectives
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Please share any comments.
Abstract Podium Presentation #3 - Anticoagulation patterns while undergoing Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Testing - Jessie Caprino MD
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Free of commercial bias
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Evidence-based
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Presentation met the stated objectives
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Please share any comments.
SESSION #13 - Too Close to Home: Navigating a family cancer diagnosis as a medical oncologist
Peter Crow, MD
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Free of commercial bias
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Evidence-based
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Presentation met the stated objectives
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Please share any comments.
Sarah McCraw Crow, MFA
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Free of commercial bias
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Evidence-based
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Presentation met the stated objectives
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Please share any comments.
CROSS-MEETING QUESTIONS
PROGRAM OUTCOME
As a result of this activity, I will be able to apply advances in scientific and translational research in the care of patients (knowledge, competence);
Yes
No
Other (please specify)
As a result of this activity, I will be able to evaluate tools and strategies to improve the timely and effective delivery of palliative care to patients with cancer (knowledge, competence)
Yes
No
Other (please specify)
As a result of this activity, I will implement new practices or review existing ones to improve the quality of care delivered for patients with complicated care needs (knowledge, competence)
Yes
No
Other (please specify)
As a result of this activity, I will be able to develop and implement strategies to address healthcare provider resilience(knowledge, competence)
Yes
No
Other (please specify)
As a result of this activity, I will be able to describe risk mitigation strategies related to environmental exposures and cancer
Yes
No
Other (please specify)
As a result of this activity, I will be able to dicuss ethical opportunities and risks associated with the use of AI in oncology
Yes
No
Other (please specify)
*
As a result of this activity, please share at least one specific action you will take to change your professional practice/ performance:
(Required.)
*
How will you change how you work as a team member as a result of participating in this activity? Please check all that apply:
(Required.)
Improve communication with team members
Suggest that further education on this topic be shared with team members
Clarify understanding of team roles
Review and/or recommend modifications to team protocols
Discuss studies mentioned in the activity with my team to stimulate discussion/debate
I do not plan to change how I work as a team member as a result of this activity
Other (please explain)
ADMINISTRATIVE ARRANGEMENTS:
Please check the administrative arrangements as satisfactory or unsatisfactory
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Promotional information provided adequate information
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Registration process was efficient
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Scheduling of the activity met my needs
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
General comments about the program:
Suggestions for future program topics:
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
What topics/changes would you recommend to make this activity a more meaningful educational experience?
Please make suggestions for future meetings:
What is the most important benefit that NNECOS provides you?
Please tell us one activity/goal that you would like NNECOS to pursue:
*
Are you seeking educational credit for this meeting?
(Required.)
Yes - CME
Yes - NCPD
Yes - CPE
Yes - ASWB
Yes - Other - please provide a certificate of attendance that I can use in submitting credit on my own
No - I am not seeking educational credit