NNECOS 2025 Annual Meeting & Palliative Care Symposium Question Title * Name: Question Title * Credentials/Degree Question Title * Practice/Organization Question Title * Years in practice: Question Title * Practice Setting Community Academic Question Title * I am a (select one): Physician Fellow Resident Physician PA NP RN PharmD Social Worker Medical Student Other (please specify) Question Title * Email (where we'll send your continuing education certificate) *ALL FIELDS IN THIS SECTION REQUIRED FOR MOC Question Title * ABIM or NAPB ID: Question Title * DOB - required for MOC/ACPE Credit QUALITY OF INSTRUCTION: (if multiple presenters, evaluate the following for each speaker/presenter individually) Palliative Care Symposium Question Title * Session #1 - Assessing Cognitive Health: Screening for Cognitive Changes in Cancer Patients - Heather Wishart, PhD Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Knowledge of Subject Knowledge of Subject Excellent Knowledge of Subject Very Good Knowledge of Subject Good Knowledge of Subject Fair Knowledge of Subject Poor Organization and clarity of content Organization and clarity of content Excellent Organization and clarity of content Very Good Organization and clarity of content Good Organization and clarity of content Fair Organization and clarity of content Poor Effectiveness of teaching methods Effectiveness of teaching methods Excellent Effectiveness of teaching methods Very Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Fair Effectiveness of teaching methods Poor Free of commercial bias Free of commercial bias Excellent Free of commercial bias Very Good Free of commercial bias Good Free of commercial bias Fair Free of commercial bias Poor Evidence-based Evidence-based Excellent Evidence-based Very Good Evidence-based Good Evidence-based Fair Evidence-based Poor Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Excellent Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Very Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Fair Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Poor Presentation met the stated objectives Presentation met the stated objectives Excellent Presentation met the stated objectives Very Good Presentation met the stated objectives Good Presentation met the stated objectives Fair Presentation met the stated objectives Poor Please share any comments. Question Title * Session #2 - Anxiolytics and Antidepressants in Cancer Care: Managing Anxiety, Fear, and Depression in Patients with Cancer - Terry Rabinowitz, MD Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Knowledge of Subject Knowledge of Subject Excellent Knowledge of Subject Very Good Knowledge of Subject Good Knowledge of Subject Fair Knowledge of Subject Poor Organization and clarity of content Organization and clarity of content Excellent Organization and clarity of content Very Good Organization and clarity of content Good Organization and clarity of content Fair Organization and clarity of content Poor Effectiveness of teaching methods Effectiveness of teaching methods Excellent Effectiveness of teaching methods Very Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Fair Effectiveness of teaching methods Poor Free of commercial bias Free of commercial bias Excellent Free of commercial bias Very Good Free of commercial bias Good Free of commercial bias Fair Free of commercial bias Poor Evidence-based Evidence-based Excellent Evidence-based Very Good Evidence-based Good Evidence-based Fair Evidence-based Poor Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Excellent Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Very Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Fair Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Poor Presentation met the stated objectives Presentation met the stated objectives Excellent Presentation met the stated objectives Very Good Presentation met the stated objectives Good Presentation met the stated objectives Fair Presentation met the stated objectives Poor Please share any comments. Question Title * Session #3 - Screening for Substance Misuse Disorder in Cancer Patients: Identifying and Addressing Risk - Kathleen Broglio DNP, ANP-BC, ACHPN, CPE, FPCN, FAANP Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Knowledge of Subject Knowledge of Subject Excellent Knowledge of Subject Very Good Knowledge of Subject Good Knowledge of Subject Fair Knowledge of Subject Poor Organization and clarity of content Organization and clarity of content Excellent Organization and clarity of content Very Good Organization and clarity of content Good Organization and clarity of content Fair Organization and clarity of content Poor Effectiveness of teaching methods Effectiveness of teaching methods Excellent Effectiveness of teaching methods Very Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Fair Effectiveness of teaching methods Poor Free of commercial bias Free of commercial bias Excellent Free of commercial bias Very Good Free of commercial bias Good Free of commercial bias Fair Free of commercial bias Poor Evidence-based Evidence-based Excellent Evidence-based Very Good Evidence-based Good Evidence-based Fair Evidence-based Poor Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Excellent Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Very Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Fair Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Poor Presentation met the stated objectives Presentation met the stated objectives Excellent Presentation met the stated objectives Very Good Presentation met the stated objectives Good Presentation met the stated objectives Fair Presentation met the stated objectives Poor Please share any comments. Question Title * Session #4 - Finding Rest: Supporting Cancer Patients Struggling with Insomnia - Lisa St. Pierre, MSN, PMHNP Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Knowledge of Subject Knowledge of Subject Excellent Knowledge of Subject Very Good Knowledge of Subject Good Knowledge of Subject Fair Knowledge of Subject Poor Organization and clarity of content Organization and clarity of content Excellent Organization and clarity of content Very Good Organization and clarity of content Good Organization and clarity of content Fair Organization and clarity of content Poor Effectiveness of teaching methods Effectiveness of teaching methods Excellent Effectiveness of teaching methods Very Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Fair Effectiveness of teaching methods Poor Free of commercial bias Free of commercial bias Excellent Free of commercial bias Very Good Free of commercial bias Good Free of commercial bias Fair Free of commercial bias Poor Evidence-based Evidence-based Excellent Evidence-based Very Good Evidence-based Good Evidence-based Fair Evidence-based Poor Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Excellent Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Very Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Fair Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Poor Presentation met the stated objectives Presentation met the stated objectives Excellent Presentation met the stated objectives Very Good Presentation met the stated objectives Good Presentation met the stated objectives Fair Presentation met the stated objectives Poor Please share any comments. Annual Meeting - Friday Question Title * Session #5 - Caregiver Support- “Behind the scenes” how can we best support our patient’s caregivers? - Maija Reblin, PhD Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Knowledge of Subject Knowledge of Subject Excellent Knowledge of Subject Very Good Knowledge of Subject Good Knowledge of Subject Fair Knowledge of Subject Poor Organization and clarity of content Organization and clarity of content Excellent Organization and clarity of content Very Good Organization and clarity of content Good Organization and clarity of content Fair Organization and clarity of content Poor Effectiveness of teaching methods Effectiveness of teaching methods Excellent Effectiveness of teaching methods Very Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Fair Effectiveness of teaching methods Poor Free of commercial bias Free of commercial bias Excellent Free of commercial bias Very Good Free of commercial bias Good Free of commercial bias Fair Free of commercial bias Poor Evidence-based Evidence-based Excellent Evidence-based Very Good Evidence-based Good Evidence-based Fair Evidence-based Poor Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Excellent Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Very Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Fair Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Poor Presentation met the stated objectives Presentation met the stated objectives Excellent Presentation met the stated objectives Very Good Presentation met the stated objectives Good Presentation met the stated objectives Fair Presentation met the stated objectives Poor Please share any comments. Question Title * Session #6 - Bispecifics and Solid Tumors – An update as these treatments enter the clinic more and more.David Qualls Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Knowledge of Subject Knowledge of Subject Excellent Knowledge of Subject Very Good Knowledge of Subject Good Knowledge of Subject Fair Knowledge of Subject Poor Organization and clarity of content Organization and clarity of content Excellent Organization and clarity of content Very Good Organization and clarity of content Good Organization and clarity of content Fair Organization and clarity of content Poor Effectiveness of teaching methods Effectiveness of teaching methods Excellent Effectiveness of teaching methods Very Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Fair Effectiveness of teaching methods Poor Free of commercial bias Free of commercial bias Excellent Free of commercial bias Very Good Free of commercial bias Good Free of commercial bias Fair Free of commercial bias Poor Evidence-based Evidence-based Excellent Evidence-based Very Good Evidence-based Good Evidence-based Fair Evidence-based Poor Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Excellent Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Very Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Fair Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Poor Presentation met the stated objectives Presentation met the stated objectives Excellent Presentation met the stated objectives Very Good Presentation met the stated objectives Good Presentation met the stated objectives Fair Presentation met the stated objectives Poor Please share any comments. Question Title * Yoni Resnick Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Knowledge of Subject Knowledge of Subject Excellent Knowledge of Subject Very Good Knowledge of Subject Good Knowledge of Subject Fair Knowledge of Subject Poor Organization and clarity of content Organization and clarity of content Excellent Organization and clarity of content Very Good Organization and clarity of content Good Organization and clarity of content Fair Organization and clarity of content Poor Effectiveness of teaching methods Effectiveness of teaching methods Excellent Effectiveness of teaching methods Very Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Fair Effectiveness of teaching methods Poor Free of commercial bias Free of commercial bias Excellent Free of commercial bias Very Good Free of commercial bias Good Free of commercial bias Fair Free of commercial bias Poor Evidence-based Evidence-based Excellent Evidence-based Very Good Evidence-based Good Evidence-based Fair Evidence-based Poor Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Excellent Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Very Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Fair Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Poor Presentation met the stated objectives Presentation met the stated objectives Excellent Presentation met the stated objectives Very Good Presentation met the stated objectives Good Presentation met the stated objectives Fair Presentation met the stated objectives Poor Please share any comments. Question Title * ABSTRACT PODIUM PRESENTATION #1 - Predicting tarlatamab response in small cell carcinoma - Zofia Cieslak, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Knowledge of Subject Knowledge of Subject Excellent Knowledge of Subject Very Good Knowledge of Subject Good Knowledge of Subject Fair Knowledge of Subject Poor Organization and clarity of content Organization and clarity of content Excellent Organization and clarity of content Very Good Organization and clarity of content Good Organization and clarity of content Fair Organization and clarity of content Poor Effectiveness of teaching methods Effectiveness of teaching methods Excellent Effectiveness of teaching methods Very Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Fair Effectiveness of teaching methods Poor Free of commercial bias Free of commercial bias Excellent Free of commercial bias Very Good Free of commercial bias Good Free of commercial bias Fair Free of commercial bias Poor Evidence-based Evidence-based Excellent Evidence-based Very Good Evidence-based Good Evidence-based Fair Evidence-based Poor Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Excellent Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Very Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Fair Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Poor Presentation met the stated objectives Presentation met the stated objectives Excellent Presentation met the stated objectives Very Good Presentation met the stated objectives Good Presentation met the stated objectives Fair Presentation met the stated objectives Poor Please share any comments. CONCURRENT SESSIONS Question Title * CONCURRENT SESSION #7 - Physician Burnout and Time Management – Fitting it all in, strategies to care for patients and yourself. - Diane Shannon, MD Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Knowledge of Subject Knowledge of Subject Excellent Knowledge of Subject Very Good Knowledge of Subject Good Knowledge of Subject Fair Knowledge of Subject Poor Organization and clarity of content Organization and clarity of content Excellent Organization and clarity of content Very Good Organization and clarity of content Good Organization and clarity of content Fair Organization and clarity of content Poor Effectiveness of teaching methods Effectiveness of teaching methods Excellent Effectiveness of teaching methods Very Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Fair Effectiveness of teaching methods Poor Free of commercial bias Free of commercial bias Excellent Free of commercial bias Very Good Free of commercial bias Good Free of commercial bias Fair Free of commercial bias Poor Evidence-based Evidence-based Excellent Evidence-based Very Good Evidence-based Good Evidence-based Fair Evidence-based Poor Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Excellent Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Very Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Fair Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Poor Presentation met the stated objectives Presentation met the stated objectives Excellent Presentation met the stated objectives Very Good Presentation met the stated objectives Good Presentation met the stated objectives Fair Presentation met the stated objectives Poor Please share any comments Question Title * CONCURRENT SESSION #7 - Dermatologic ToxicitiesAshleigh Eberly Puleo, PA-C Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Knowledge of Subject Knowledge of Subject Excellent Knowledge of Subject Very Good Knowledge of Subject Good Knowledge of Subject Fair Knowledge of Subject Poor Organization and clarity of content Organization and clarity of content Excellent Organization and clarity of content Very Good Organization and clarity of content Good Organization and clarity of content Fair Organization and clarity of content Poor Effectiveness of teaching methods Effectiveness of teaching methods Excellent Effectiveness of teaching methods Very Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Fair Effectiveness of teaching methods Poor Free of commercial bias Free of commercial bias Excellent Free of commercial bias Very Good Free of commercial bias Good Free of commercial bias Fair Free of commercial bias Poor Evidence-based Evidence-based Excellent Evidence-based Very Good Evidence-based Good Evidence-based Fair Evidence-based Poor Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Excellent Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Very Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Fair Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Poor Presentation met the stated objectives Presentation met the stated objectives Excellent Presentation met the stated objectives Very Good Presentation met the stated objectives Good Presentation met the stated objectives Fair Presentation met the stated objectives Poor Please share any comments. Question Title * Suzanne MacRae, RN Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Knowledge of Subject Knowledge of Subject Excellent Knowledge of Subject Very Good Knowledge of Subject Good Knowledge of Subject Fair Knowledge of Subject Poor Organization and clarity of content Organization and clarity of content Excellent Organization and clarity of content Very Good Organization and clarity of content Good Organization and clarity of content Fair Organization and clarity of content Poor Effectiveness of teaching methods Effectiveness of teaching methods Excellent Effectiveness of teaching methods Very Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Fair Effectiveness of teaching methods Poor Free of commercial bias Free of commercial bias Excellent Free of commercial bias Very Good Free of commercial bias Good Free of commercial bias Fair Free of commercial bias Poor Evidence-based Evidence-based Excellent Evidence-based Very Good Evidence-based Good Evidence-based Fair Evidence-based Poor Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Excellent Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Very Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Fair Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Poor Presentation met the stated objectives Presentation met the stated objectives Excellent Presentation met the stated objectives Very Good Presentation met the stated objectives Good Presentation met the stated objectives Fair Presentation met the stated objectives Poor Please share any comments. Question Title * SESSION #8 - Environmental Exposures – Digging into the data, how accurately to talk about exposures with patients.Christine M Gunn, MA Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Knowledge of Subject Knowledge of Subject Excellent Knowledge of Subject Very Good Knowledge of Subject Good Knowledge of Subject Fair Knowledge of Subject Poor Organization and clarity of content Organization and clarity of content Excellent Organization and clarity of content Very Good Organization and clarity of content Good Organization and clarity of content Fair Organization and clarity of content Poor Effectiveness of teaching methods Effectiveness of teaching methods Excellent Effectiveness of teaching methods Very Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Fair Effectiveness of teaching methods Poor Free of commercial bias Free of commercial bias Excellent Free of commercial bias Very Good Free of commercial bias Good Free of commercial bias Fair Free of commercial bias Poor Evidence-based Evidence-based Excellent Evidence-based Very Good Evidence-based Good Evidence-based Fair Evidence-based Poor Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Excellent Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Very Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Fair Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Poor Presentation met the stated objectives Presentation met the stated objectives Excellent Presentation met the stated objectives Very Good Presentation met the stated objectives Good Presentation met the stated objectives Fair Presentation met the stated objectives Poor Please share any comments. Question Title * Megan E. Romano, PhD Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Knowledge of Subject Knowledge of Subject Excellent Knowledge of Subject Very Good Knowledge of Subject Good Knowledge of Subject Fair Knowledge of Subject Poor Organization and clarity of content Organization and clarity of content Excellent Organization and clarity of content Very Good Organization and clarity of content Good Organization and clarity of content Fair Organization and clarity of content Poor Effectiveness of teaching methods Effectiveness of teaching methods Excellent Effectiveness of teaching methods Very Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Fair Effectiveness of teaching methods Poor Free of commercial bias Free of commercial bias Excellent Free of commercial bias Very Good Free of commercial bias Good Free of commercial bias Fair Free of commercial bias Poor Evidence-based Evidence-based Excellent Evidence-based Very Good Evidence-based Good Evidence-based Fair Evidence-based Poor Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Excellent Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Very Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Fair Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Poor Presentation met the stated objectives Presentation met the stated objectives Excellent Presentation met the stated objectives Very Good Presentation met the stated objectives Good Presentation met the stated objectives Fair Presentation met the stated objectives Poor Please share any comments. Annual Meeting - Saturday Question Title * GRUNBERG KEYNOTE SESSION #9 - Grunberg Keynote - AI in Oncology –It’s here whether we like it or not, harnessing AI for better patient care. - Andrew Hantel, MD Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Knowledge of Subject Knowledge of Subject Excellent Knowledge of Subject Very Good Knowledge of Subject Good Knowledge of Subject Fair Knowledge of Subject Poor Organization and clarity of content Organization and clarity of content Excellent Organization and clarity of content Very Good Organization and clarity of content Good Organization and clarity of content Fair Organization and clarity of content Poor Effectiveness of teaching methods Effectiveness of teaching methods Excellent Effectiveness of teaching methods Very Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Fair Effectiveness of teaching methods Poor Free of commercial bias Free of commercial bias Excellent Free of commercial bias Very Good Free of commercial bias Good Free of commercial bias Fair Free of commercial bias Poor Evidence-based Evidence-based Excellent Evidence-based Very Good Evidence-based Good Evidence-based Fair Evidence-based Poor Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Excellent Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Very Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Fair Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Poor Presentation met the stated objectives Presentation met the stated objectives Excellent Presentation met the stated objectives Very Good Presentation met the stated objectives Good Presentation met the stated objectives Fair Presentation met the stated objectives Poor Please share any comments. Question Title * Abstract Podium Presentation #2 - Clinical Application of Targeted Deep Sequencing in Multiple Myeloma: A Multi- Institutional Experience - Rutu Vyas, MPH - presented by Parth Shah, MD Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Knowledge of Subject Knowledge of Subject Excellent Knowledge of Subject Very Good Knowledge of Subject Good Knowledge of Subject Fair Knowledge of Subject Poor Organization and clarity of content Organization and clarity of content Excellent Organization and clarity of content Very Good Organization and clarity of content Good Organization and clarity of content Fair Organization and clarity of content Poor Effectiveness of teaching methods Effectiveness of teaching methods Excellent Effectiveness of teaching methods Very Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Fair Effectiveness of teaching methods Poor Free of commercial bias Free of commercial bias Excellent Free of commercial bias Very Good Free of commercial bias Good Free of commercial bias Fair Free of commercial bias Poor Evidence-based Evidence-based Excellent Evidence-based Very Good Evidence-based Good Evidence-based Fair Evidence-based Poor Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Excellent Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Very Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Fair Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Poor Presentation met the stated objectives Presentation met the stated objectives Excellent Presentation met the stated objectives Very Good Presentation met the stated objectives Good Presentation met the stated objectives Fair Presentation met the stated objectives Poor Please share any comments. Question Title * SESSION #10 - Evolving multidisciplinary treatment paradigms in oncology -Clayton Smith, MD Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Knowledge of Subject Knowledge of Subject Excellent Knowledge of Subject Very Good Knowledge of Subject Good Knowledge of Subject Fair Knowledge of Subject Poor Organization and clarity of content Organization and clarity of content Excellent Organization and clarity of content Very Good Organization and clarity of content Good Organization and clarity of content Fair Organization and clarity of content Poor Effectiveness of teaching methods Effectiveness of teaching methods Excellent Effectiveness of teaching methods Very Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Fair Effectiveness of teaching methods Poor Free of commercial bias Free of commercial bias Excellent Free of commercial bias Very Good Free of commercial bias Good Free of commercial bias Fair Free of commercial bias Poor Evidence-based Evidence-based Excellent Evidence-based Very Good Evidence-based Good Evidence-based Fair Evidence-based Poor Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Excellent Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Very Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Fair Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Poor Presentation met the stated objectives Presentation met the stated objectives Excellent Presentation met the stated objectives Very Good Presentation met the stated objectives Good Presentation met the stated objectives Fair Presentation met the stated objectives Poor Please share any comments. CONCURRENT SESSIONS Question Title * CONCURRENT SESSION #11 - Iron Revolution: Updates in diagnosis and management in iron deficiency -Hande H .Tuncer, MD Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Knowledge of Subject Knowledge of Subject Excellent Knowledge of Subject Very Good Knowledge of Subject Good Knowledge of Subject Fair Knowledge of Subject Poor Organization and clarity of content Organization and clarity of content Excellent Organization and clarity of content Very Good Organization and clarity of content Good Organization and clarity of content Fair Organization and clarity of content Poor Effectiveness of teaching methods Effectiveness of teaching methods Excellent Effectiveness of teaching methods Very Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Fair Effectiveness of teaching methods Poor Free of commercial bias Free of commercial bias Excellent Free of commercial bias Very Good Free of commercial bias Good Free of commercial bias Fair Free of commercial bias Poor Evidence-based Evidence-based Excellent Evidence-based Very Good Evidence-based Good Evidence-based Fair Evidence-based Poor Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Excellent Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Very Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Fair Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Poor Presentation met the stated objectives Presentation met the stated objectives Excellent Presentation met the stated objectives Very Good Presentation met the stated objectives Good Presentation met the stated objectives Fair Presentation met the stated objectives Poor Please share any comments. Question Title * CONCURRENT SESSION #11 - Ins and Outs of Pelvic Therapy -Jill Cramp PT, DPT, PRPC, WCS Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Knowledge of Subject Knowledge of Subject Excellent Knowledge of Subject Very Good Knowledge of Subject Good Knowledge of Subject Fair Knowledge of Subject Poor Organization and clarity of content Organization and clarity of content Excellent Organization and clarity of content Very Good Organization and clarity of content Good Organization and clarity of content Fair Organization and clarity of content Poor Effectiveness of teaching methods Effectiveness of teaching methods Excellent Effectiveness of teaching methods Very Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Fair Effectiveness of teaching methods Poor Free of commercial bias Free of commercial bias Excellent Free of commercial bias Very Good Free of commercial bias Good Free of commercial bias Fair Free of commercial bias Poor Evidence-based Evidence-based Excellent Evidence-based Very Good Evidence-based Good Evidence-based Fair Evidence-based Poor Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Excellent Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Very Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Fair Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Poor Presentation met the stated objectives Presentation met the stated objectives Excellent Presentation met the stated objectives Very Good Presentation met the stated objectives Good Presentation met the stated objectives Fair Presentation met the stated objectives Poor Please share any comments. Question Title * SESSION #12 -Rectal Cancer Tumor Board – The changing landscape of treating rectal cancerSara W. Mayo MD, MS, FACS, FASCRS Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Knowledge of Subject Knowledge of Subject Excellent Knowledge of Subject Very Good Knowledge of Subject Good Knowledge of Subject Fair Knowledge of Subject Poor Organization and clarity of content Organization and clarity of content Excellent Organization and clarity of content Very Good Organization and clarity of content Good Organization and clarity of content Fair Organization and clarity of content Poor Effectiveness of teaching methods Effectiveness of teaching methods Excellent Effectiveness of teaching methods Very Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Fair Effectiveness of teaching methods Poor Free of commercial bias Free of commercial bias Excellent Free of commercial bias Very Good Free of commercial bias Good Free of commercial bias Fair Free of commercial bias Poor Evidence-based Evidence-based Excellent Evidence-based Very Good Evidence-based Good Evidence-based Fair Evidence-based Poor Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Excellent Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Very Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Fair Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Poor Presentation met the stated objectives Presentation met the stated objectives Excellent Presentation met the stated objectives Very Good Presentation met the stated objectives Good Presentation met the stated objectives Fair Presentation met the stated objectives Poor Please share any comments. Question Title * Nicholas Jensen, MS, LCGC Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Knowledge of Subject Knowledge of Subject Excellent Knowledge of Subject Very Good Knowledge of Subject Good Knowledge of Subject Fair Knowledge of Subject Poor Organization and clarity of content Organization and clarity of content Excellent Organization and clarity of content Very Good Organization and clarity of content Good Organization and clarity of content Fair Organization and clarity of content Poor Effectiveness of teaching methods Effectiveness of teaching methods Excellent Effectiveness of teaching methods Very Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Fair Effectiveness of teaching methods Poor Free of commercial bias Free of commercial bias Excellent Free of commercial bias Very Good Free of commercial bias Good Free of commercial bias Fair Free of commercial bias Poor Evidence-based Evidence-based Excellent Evidence-based Very Good Evidence-based Good Evidence-based Fair Evidence-based Poor Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Excellent Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Very Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Fair Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Poor Presentation met the stated objectives Presentation met the stated objectives Excellent Presentation met the stated objectives Very Good Presentation met the stated objectives Good Presentation met the stated objectives Fair Presentation met the stated objectives Poor Please share any comments. Question Title * Jill Cramp PT, DPT, PRPC, WCS Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Knowledge of Subject Knowledge of Subject Excellent Knowledge of Subject Very Good Knowledge of Subject Good Knowledge of Subject Fair Knowledge of Subject Poor Organization and clarity of content Organization and clarity of content Excellent Organization and clarity of content Very Good Organization and clarity of content Good Organization and clarity of content Fair Organization and clarity of content Poor Effectiveness of teaching methods Effectiveness of teaching methods Excellent Effectiveness of teaching methods Very Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Fair Effectiveness of teaching methods Poor Free of commercial bias Free of commercial bias Excellent Free of commercial bias Very Good Free of commercial bias Good Free of commercial bias Fair Free of commercial bias Poor Evidence-based Evidence-based Excellent Evidence-based Very Good Evidence-based Good Evidence-based Fair Evidence-based Poor Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Excellent Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Very Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Fair Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Poor Presentation met the stated objectives Presentation met the stated objectives Excellent Presentation met the stated objectives Very Good Presentation met the stated objectives Good Presentation met the stated objectives Fair Presentation met the stated objectives Poor Please share any comments. Question Title * Clayton Smith, MD Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Knowledge of Subject Knowledge of Subject Excellent Knowledge of Subject Very Good Knowledge of Subject Good Knowledge of Subject Fair Knowledge of Subject Poor Organization and clarity of content Organization and clarity of content Excellent Organization and clarity of content Very Good Organization and clarity of content Good Organization and clarity of content Fair Organization and clarity of content Poor Effectiveness of teaching methods Effectiveness of teaching methods Excellent Effectiveness of teaching methods Very Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Fair Effectiveness of teaching methods Poor Free of commercial bias Free of commercial bias Excellent Free of commercial bias Very Good Free of commercial bias Good Free of commercial bias Fair Free of commercial bias Poor Evidence-based Evidence-based Excellent Evidence-based Very Good Evidence-based Good Evidence-based Fair Evidence-based Poor Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Excellent Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Very Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Fair Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Poor Presentation met the stated objectives Presentation met the stated objectives Excellent Presentation met the stated objectives Very Good Presentation met the stated objectives Good Presentation met the stated objectives Fair Presentation met the stated objectives Poor Please share any comments Question Title * Michele Mosley, MSW, LICSW Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Knowledge of Subject Knowledge of Subject Excellent Knowledge of Subject Very Good Knowledge of Subject Good Knowledge of Subject Fair Knowledge of Subject Poor Organization and clarity of content Organization and clarity of content Excellent Organization and clarity of content Very Good Organization and clarity of content Good Organization and clarity of content Fair Organization and clarity of content Poor Effectiveness of teaching methods Effectiveness of teaching methods Excellent Effectiveness of teaching methods Very Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Fair Effectiveness of teaching methods Poor Free of commercial bias Free of commercial bias Excellent Free of commercial bias Very Good Free of commercial bias Good Free of commercial bias Fair Free of commercial bias Poor Evidence-based Evidence-based Excellent Evidence-based Very Good Evidence-based Good Evidence-based Fair Evidence-based Poor Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Excellent Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Very Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Fair Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Poor Presentation met the stated objectives Presentation met the stated objectives Excellent Presentation met the stated objectives Very Good Presentation met the stated objectives Good Presentation met the stated objectives Fair Presentation met the stated objectives Poor Please share any comments. Question Title * Sarah Gillett, MD, PhD Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Knowledge of Subject Knowledge of Subject Excellent Knowledge of Subject Very Good Knowledge of Subject Good Knowledge of Subject Fair Knowledge of Subject Poor Organization and clarity of content Organization and clarity of content Excellent Organization and clarity of content Very Good Organization and clarity of content Good Organization and clarity of content Fair Organization and clarity of content Poor Effectiveness of teaching methods Effectiveness of teaching methods Excellent Effectiveness of teaching methods Very Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Fair Effectiveness of teaching methods Poor Free of commercial bias Free of commercial bias Excellent Free of commercial bias Very Good Free of commercial bias Good Free of commercial bias Fair Free of commercial bias Poor Evidence-based Evidence-based Excellent Evidence-based Very Good Evidence-based Good Evidence-based Fair Evidence-based Poor Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Excellent Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Very Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Fair Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Poor Presentation met the stated objectives Presentation met the stated objectives Excellent Presentation met the stated objectives Very Good Presentation met the stated objectives Good Presentation met the stated objectives Fair Presentation met the stated objectives Poor Please share any comments. Question Title * Abstract Podium Presentation #3 - Anticoagulation patterns while undergoing Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Testing - Jessie Caprino MD Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Knowledge of Subject Knowledge of Subject Excellent Knowledge of Subject Very Good Knowledge of Subject Good Knowledge of Subject Fair Knowledge of Subject Poor Organization and clarity of content Organization and clarity of content Excellent Organization and clarity of content Very Good Organization and clarity of content Good Organization and clarity of content Fair Organization and clarity of content Poor Effectiveness of teaching methods Effectiveness of teaching methods Excellent Effectiveness of teaching methods Very Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Fair Effectiveness of teaching methods Poor Free of commercial bias Free of commercial bias Excellent Free of commercial bias Very Good Free of commercial bias Good Free of commercial bias Fair Free of commercial bias Poor Evidence-based Evidence-based Excellent Evidence-based Very Good Evidence-based Good Evidence-based Fair Evidence-based Poor Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Excellent Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Very Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Fair Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Poor Presentation met the stated objectives Presentation met the stated objectives Excellent Presentation met the stated objectives Very Good Presentation met the stated objectives Good Presentation met the stated objectives Fair Presentation met the stated objectives Poor Please share any comments. Question Title * SESSION #13 - Too Close to Home: Navigating a family cancer diagnosis as a medical oncologistPeter Crow, MD Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Knowledge of Subject Knowledge of Subject Excellent Knowledge of Subject Very Good Knowledge of Subject Good Knowledge of Subject Fair Knowledge of Subject Poor Organization and clarity of content Organization and clarity of content Excellent Organization and clarity of content Very Good Organization and clarity of content Good Organization and clarity of content Fair Organization and clarity of content Poor Effectiveness of teaching methods Effectiveness of teaching methods Excellent Effectiveness of teaching methods Very Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Fair Effectiveness of teaching methods Poor Free of commercial bias Free of commercial bias Excellent Free of commercial bias Very Good Free of commercial bias Good Free of commercial bias Fair Free of commercial bias Poor Evidence-based Evidence-based Excellent Evidence-based Very Good Evidence-based Good Evidence-based Fair Evidence-based Poor Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Excellent Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Very Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Fair Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Poor Presentation met the stated objectives Presentation met the stated objectives Excellent Presentation met the stated objectives Very Good Presentation met the stated objectives Good Presentation met the stated objectives Fair Presentation met the stated objectives Poor Please share any comments. Question Title * Sarah McCraw Crow, MFA Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Knowledge of Subject Knowledge of Subject Excellent Knowledge of Subject Very Good Knowledge of Subject Good Knowledge of Subject Fair Knowledge of Subject Poor Organization and clarity of content Organization and clarity of content Excellent Organization and clarity of content Very Good Organization and clarity of content Good Organization and clarity of content Fair Organization and clarity of content Poor Effectiveness of teaching methods Effectiveness of teaching methods Excellent Effectiveness of teaching methods Very Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Good Effectiveness of teaching methods Fair Effectiveness of teaching methods Poor Free of commercial bias Free of commercial bias Excellent Free of commercial bias Very Good Free of commercial bias Good Free of commercial bias Fair Free of commercial bias Poor Evidence-based Evidence-based Excellent Evidence-based Very Good Evidence-based Good Evidence-based Fair Evidence-based Poor Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Excellent Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Very Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Good Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Fair Relevant financial relationships (or lack thereof) were disclosed Poor Presentation met the stated objectives Presentation met the stated objectives Excellent Presentation met the stated objectives Very Good Presentation met the stated objectives Good Presentation met the stated objectives Fair Presentation met the stated objectives Poor Please share any comments. CROSS-MEETING QUESTIONS PROGRAM OUTCOME Question Title * As a result of this activity, I will be able to apply advances in scientific and translational research in the care of patients (knowledge, competence); Yes No Other (please specify) Question Title * As a result of this activity, I will be able to evaluate tools and strategies to improve the timely and effective delivery of palliative care to patients with cancer (knowledge, competence) Yes No Other (please specify) Question Title * As a result of this activity, I will implement new practices or review existing ones to improve the quality of care delivered for patients with complicated care needs (knowledge, competence) Yes No Other (please specify) Question Title * As a result of this activity, I will be able to develop and implement strategies to address healthcare provider resilience(knowledge, competence) Yes No Other (please specify) Question Title * As a result of this activity, I will be able to describe risk mitigation strategies related to environmental exposures and cancer Yes No Other (please specify) Question Title * As a result of this activity, I will be able to dicuss ethical opportunities and risks associated with the use of AI in oncology Yes No Other (please specify) Question Title * As a result of this activity, please share at least one specific action you will take to change your professional practice/ performance: Question Title * How will you change how you work as a team member as a result of participating in this activity? Please check all that apply: Improve communication with team members Suggest that further education on this topic be shared with team members Clarify understanding of team roles Review and/or recommend modifications to team protocols Discuss studies mentioned in the activity with my team to stimulate discussion/debate I do not plan to change how I work as a team member as a result of this activity Other (please explain) ADMINISTRATIVE ARRANGEMENTS: Question Title * Please check the administrative arrangements as satisfactory or unsatisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Promotional information provided adequate information Promotional information provided adequate information Satisfactory Promotional information provided adequate information Unsatisfactory Registration process was efficient Registration process was efficient Satisfactory Registration process was efficient Unsatisfactory Scheduling of the activity met my needs Scheduling of the activity met my needs Satisfactory Scheduling of the activity met my needs Unsatisfactory Question Title * General comments about the program: Question Title * Suggestions for future program topics: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Question Title * What topics/changes would you recommend to make this activity a more meaningful educational experience? Question Title * Please make suggestions for future meetings: Question Title * What is the most important benefit that NNECOS provides you? Question Title * Please tell us one activity/goal that you would like NNECOS to pursue: Question Title * Are you seeking educational credit for this meeting? Yes - CME Yes - NCPD (Nursing) Yes - CPE Yes - ASWB Yes - Other - please provide a certificate of attendance that I can use in submitting credit on my own No - I am not seeking educational credit Next
