2024 NACNS Student Poster Judging

*Elements are "Bolded"

Question Title

* 1. Judge's Full Name

Question Title

* 2. Select the Student Poster you are judging:

Question Title

* 3. Title: Should be clear, concise, reflect the content and draw interest of attendees

1 = Very Poor (Title does not reflect the theme/topic)

2 = Needs Improvement (Difficult to discern the project theme/topic)

3 = Acceptable/Average (Title is lengthy, missing key words to describe theme/topic)

4 = Very Good (Title accurately reflects the theme/topic)

Question Title

* 4. Visual Appeal: Adequate whitespace, easy to follow format, font is easy to read (large enough, appropriate font choice), visuals have significance and are appropriate to the content. Poster is self-explanatory.

1 = Very Poor (3 or all elements are missing)

2 = Needs Improvement (2 elements are missing)

3 = Acceptable/Average (1 element is missing)

4 = Very Good (all elements are present)

Question Title

* 5. Background and significance to advance nursing practice: Problem is clearly identified. Significance to the CNS role and clinical practice is clear.

1 = Very Poor (all elements are missing)

2 = Needs Improvement (2 elements are missing)

3 = Acceptable/Average (1 element is missing)

4 = Very Good (all elements are present)

Question Title

* 6. Purpose/Objective: Adequately describes the purpose/intent of the project.

0 = No (gets 0 points)

1 = Yes (gets 1 point)

Question Title

* 7. Evaluation/Outcome: outcomes are clearly demonstrated with metrics that include post-data collection, project limitations. If applicable, cost savings metrics are included if applicable.

1 = Very Poor (all elements are missing)

2 = Needs Improvement (missing 2 elements)

3 = Acceptable/Average (missing 1 element)

4 = Very Good (cost savings/return on investment)

Question Title

* 8. Discussion/Implications: lessons learned from the project are adequately defined, implications to advance nursing practice, clinical practice, and/or future research are addressed.

1 = Very Poor (missing all elements)

2 = Needs Improvement/Poor (missing 2 elements)

3 = Acceptable/Average (missing 1 element)

4 = Very Good (all elements are present)

Question Title

* 9. Level of Impact

1 Unit

Multiple Units

Hospital

Multiple Hospitals

2024 NACNS Student Poster Judging

Question Title

* 1. Judge's Full Name

Question Title

* 2. Select the Student Poster you are judging:

Question Title

* 3. Title: Should be clear, concise, reflect the content and draw interest of attendees

Question Title

* 4. Visual Appeal: Adequate whitespace, easy to follow format, font is easy to read (large enough, appropriate font choice), visuals have significance and are appropriate to the content. Poster is self-explanatory.

Question Title

* 5. Background and significance to advance nursing practice: Problem is clearly identified. Significance to the CNS role and clinical practice is clear.

Question Title

* 6. Purpose/Objective: Adequately describes the purpose/intent of the project.

Question Title

* 7. Evaluation/Outcome: outcomes are clearly demonstrated with metrics that include post-data collection, project limitations. If applicable, cost savings metrics are included if applicable.

Question Title

* 8. Discussion/Implications: lessons learned from the project are adequately defined, implications to advance nursing practice, clinical practice, and/or future research are addressed.

Question Title

* 9. Level of Impact

Question Title

* 10. Overall Comments