2022 ALL IN Campus Democracy Challenge Post-Election Survey

Thank you for participating in this survey! Your responses will help us better understand nonpartisan democratic engagement on your campus and how ALL IN can best support your efforts.

For each of the following categories, please select the response that best describes the current situation at your institution with regard to democratic engagement (e.g., civic learning, political engagement, and voter participation).

If you have any questions or concerns contact Stephanie King, senior director of strategic initiatives, at Stephanie.King@civicnation.org.

Question Title

* 1. What is the full name of your institution?

Question Title

* 2. What is your title at the institution?

Question Title

* 3. What is the your role on campus?

Question Title

* 4. What is your email address?

Question Title

* 5. Leadership:
Five categories of stakeholders are encouraged for campus democratic engagement working groups: 1) students, 2) faculty, 3) student affairs, 4) community/national organizations, and 5) local elections office coordination.

A leadership team of relevant stakeholders (across all 5 categories) exists and includes diverse and marginalized communities.

A leadership team with many relevant stakeholders (across 3-4 categories) exists and includes diverse and marginalized communities.

A leadership team with a few relevant stakeholders (across 1-2 categories) exists or a leadereship team is in the process of being formed.

A leadership team has not yet been formed and there are no plans to develop one.

Question Title

* 6. Commitment:
Extent of institutional commitment to improving democratic engagement.

Institutional commitment is visible and widely communicated internally and externally. It is woven into the culture of the institution and is clearly reflected in the institution's mission, learning outcomes, curriculum, and co-curriculum.

Institutional commitment exists across the institution but is not widely communicated or reflected in the institution's mission, learning outcomes, curriculum, and co-curriculum.

Institutional commitment is found in individual departments or programs but not across the institution as a whole.

There is little or no institutional commitment to improving democratic engagement.

Question Title

* 7. Landscape:
Analysis of student data, campus climate, and current institutional efforts for improving democratic engagement.

The institution has a comprehensive understanding of its students, campus efforts, and climate and is using this information to inform its strategy.

The institution has a general understanding of its students, campus efforts, and/or climate and may be using this information to inform its strategy but not in comprehensive ways.

The institution is in the process of developing a landscape analysis of its students, campus efforts, and climate.

The institution has not done a landscape analysis, and there are no plans to do so.

Question Title

* 8. Goals:
Short-term (e.g., by next election) and long-term (e.g., in next decade or multiple election cycles) democratic engagement goals.

The institution has established short-term AND long-term democratic engagement goals. Goals are also S.M.A.R.T.I.E.: Specific, Measurable, Ambitious, Realistic, Timebound, Inclusive, and Equitable.

The institution has established short-term AND long-term democratic engagement goals, but some goals may be unrealistic.

The institution has established only short-term OR long-term democratic engagement goals.

The institution has not established democratic engagement goals.

Question Title

* 9. To what extent does your institution have goals and/or strategies related to expanding student democratic engagement in the following areas?

	To a great extent	To a moderate extent	Only a little	Not at all
Civic learning	Civic learning To a great extent	Civic learning To a moderate extent	Civic learning Only a little	Civic learning Not at all
Political engagement	Political engagement To a great extent	Political engagement To a moderate extent	Political engagement Only a little	Political engagement Not at all
Voter participation	Voter participation To a great extent	Voter participation To a moderate extent	Voter participation Only a little	Voter participation Not at all

Question Title

* 10. Strategy:
Institutional efforts to reach desired democratic engagement goals.

Voter registration is the process of successfully completing the application to be able to cast a ballot in an election.
Voter education is the curricular and co-curricular activities offered to students and designed to facilitate civic learning, political engagement, and increase participation in elections.
Voter turnout is the act of casting a ballot, in any manner (e.g., early, in person, absentee).

Strategy includes multiple voter registration, voter education, and voter turnout activities. Activities are an established part of the institution's curriculum and co-curriculum and go beyond specific elections.

Strategy includes voter registration, voter education, and voter turnout activities. Activities occur inside and outside the classroom, but are not a systematic part of the curriculum and may occur only during election years.

Strategy includes voter registration, voter education, or voter turnout activities, but not all three. Activities predominantly occur outside the classroom and during election years.

Institution makes little or no coordinated effort to increase voter registration, voter education, and voter turnout.

Question Title

* 11. National Study on Learning, Voting, and Engagement (NSLVE):
Free report providing campuses with their actual student registration and voting rates.

The institution uses NSLVE data to set specific voting goals for its overall student population AND diverse and marginalized communities.

The institution uses NSLVE data to set general voting goals only for its overall student population.

The institution participates in NSLVE but does not use the data to set voting goals.

The institution does not participate in NSLVE.

Question Title

* 12. Reporting:
Institutional efforts to make democratic engagement plans, data, and reports public.

Action plan, NSLVE data, and progress reports are shared on campus and are publicly available.

Some portions of the action plan, NSLVE data and progress reports are shared on campus and/or publicly.

A plan to share the action plan, NSLVE data and progress reports on campus and/or publicly is being developed.

There are no institutional efforts to share the action plan, NSLVE data and progress reports on campus and/or publicly.

Question Title

* 13. Evaluation:
Institutional efforts to evaluate the democratic engagement action plan, implementation, efforts, and results.

The institution collects and analyzes data to evaluate the action plan, implementation, efforts, and results and uses the data to make improvements.

The institution collects and analyzes some data to evaluate the action plan, implementation, efforts, and results, but the evaluation efforts are not extensive enough to be used to make improvements.

A plan to evaluate the action plan, implementation, efforts, and results is being developed.

There are no institutional efforts to evaluate the action plan, implementation, efforts, and results.

2022 ALL IN Campus Democracy Challenge Post-Election Survey

Question Title

* 1. What is the full name of your institution?

Question Title

* 2. What is your title at the institution?

Question Title

* 3. What is the your role on campus?

Question Title

* 4. What is your email address?

Question Title

* 5. Leadership: Five categories of stakeholders are encouraged for campus democratic engagement working groups: 1) students, 2) faculty, 3) student affairs, 4) community/national organizations, and 5) local elections office coordination.

Question Title

* 6. Commitment:Extent of institutional commitment to improving democratic engagement.

Question Title

* 7. Landscape:Analysis of student data, campus climate, and current institutional efforts for improving democratic engagement.

Question Title

* 8. Goals:Short-term (e.g., by next election) and long-term (e.g., in next decade or multiple election cycles) democratic engagement goals.

Question Title

* 9. To what extent does your institution have goals and/or strategies related to expanding student democratic engagement in the following areas?

Question Title

Question Title

* 11. National Study on Learning, Voting, and Engagement (NSLVE):Free report providing campuses with their actual student registration and voting rates.

Question Title

* 12. Reporting:Institutional efforts to make democratic engagement plans, data, and reports public.

Question Title

* 13. Evaluation:Institutional efforts to evaluate the democratic engagement action plan, implementation, efforts, and results.

Question Title

* 14. Comments:

* 5. Leadership:
Five categories of stakeholders are encouraged for campus democratic engagement working groups: 1) students, 2) faculty, 3) student affairs, 4) community/national organizations, and 5) local elections office coordination.

* 6. Commitment:
Extent of institutional commitment to improving democratic engagement.

* 7. Landscape:
Analysis of student data, campus climate, and current institutional efforts for improving democratic engagement.

* 8. Goals:
Short-term (e.g., by next election) and long-term (e.g., in next decade or multiple election cycles) democratic engagement goals.

* 11. National Study on Learning, Voting, and Engagement (NSLVE):
Free report providing campuses with their actual student registration and voting rates.

* 12. Reporting:
Institutional efforts to make democratic engagement plans, data, and reports public.

* 13. Evaluation:
Institutional efforts to evaluate the democratic engagement action plan, implementation, efforts, and results.