AESC 2021 CME Evaluation - WEDNESDAY Speakers

Please rate the effectiveness of each speaker you heard today in terms of their overall presentation and educational content. If you did not hear a particular talk, mark the "N/A" option. If you did not attend any presentations today, do not submit the survey.

Wednesday (8/4) Speakers

Question Title

* 1. Scientific Session V --

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor	N/A
Henderer	Henderer Excellent	Henderer Good	Henderer Fair	Henderer Poor	Henderer N/A
Setabutr	Setabutr Excellent	Setabutr Good	Setabutr Fair	Setabutr Poor	Setabutr N/A
Orge	Orge Excellent	Orge Good	Orge Fair	Orge Poor	Orge N/A
Baratz	Baratz Excellent	Baratz Good	Baratz Fair	Baratz Poor	Baratz N/A
Tao	Tao Excellent	Tao Good	Tao Fair	Tao Poor	Tao N/A
Bell	Bell Excellent	Bell Good	Bell Fair	Bell Poor	Bell N/A
Albanis	Albanis Excellent	Albanis Good	Albanis Fair	Albanis Poor	Albanis N/A
Ellis, Jim	Ellis, Jim Excellent	Ellis, Jim Good	Ellis, Jim Fair	Ellis, Jim Poor	Ellis, Jim N/A
Carlson	Carlson Excellent	Carlson Good	Carlson Fair	Carlson Poor	Carlson N/A

Question Title

* 2. Session V comments (if any)

Question Title

* 3. Scientific Session VI --

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor	N/A
Shaw	Shaw Excellent	Shaw Good	Shaw Fair	Shaw Poor	Shaw N/A
Chiu	Chiu Excellent	Chiu Good	Chiu Fair	Chiu Poor	Chiu N/A
Fish	Fish Excellent	Fish Good	Fish Fair	Fish Poor	Fish N/A
Ruedemann Lecture - Ed Isbey III	Ruedemann Lecture - Ed Isbey III Excellent	Ruedemann Lecture - Ed Isbey III Good	Ruedemann Lecture - Ed Isbey III Fair	Ruedemann Lecture - Ed Isbey III Poor	Ruedemann Lecture - Ed Isbey III N/A

AESC 2021 CME Evaluation - WEDNESDAY Speakers

Question Title

* 1. Scientific Session V --

Question Title

* 2. Session V comments (if any)

Question Title

* 3. Scientific Session VI --

Question Title

* 4. Session VI comments (if any)

Question Title

* 5. If you noticed any commercial bias among today's speakers, please summarize here. LEAVE BLANK there was no commercial bias noted.