Skip to content
2018 Annual Meeting- QME Course
Thursday May 31
Program Evaluation and Record of Attendance
To receive verification of your attendance and CME hours, COMPLETE this evaluation form.
1.
Address
Name
Email Address
2.
Apportionment Symposium
Poor
Fair
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
Scott Anderson, M.D.
Poor
Fair
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
Richard Braun, M.D.
Poor
Fair
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
Samuel Ahn, M.D.
Poor
Fair
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
3.
Apportioning to Genetic Diseases Symposium
Poor
Fair
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
Gideon Baum, Consulting Senate Labor & Industrial Relations Committee
Poor
Fair
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
Jeffrey Coe, M.D.
Poor
Fair
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
Eugene Carragee, M.D., Standford
Poor
Fair
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
4.
Important Worker's Compensation Rulings
Poor
Fair
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
Sean Morrisroe, Esq., Bradford & Barthel, LLP
Poor
Fair
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
5.
Why 400 QMEs Have Been Removed from the QME System
Poor
Fair
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
Bill Tappin, Esq., Tappin and Associates
Poor
Fair
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
6.
How to Write Like an Attorney
Poor
Fair
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
Sue Honor-Vangerov, Esq.
Poor
Fair
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
7.
Challenging QME/AME Reports
Poor
Fair
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
Keith More, Esq., Bentley & More
Poor
Fair
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
Bill Tappin, Esq., Tappin and Associates
Poor
Fair
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
8.
Pain Management Treatment Options
Poor
Fair
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
Steven Feinberg, M.D. Feinberg Medical Group
Poor
Fair
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
9.
DWC 2018 Priorities
Poor
Fair
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
George Parisotto, Esq., AD Div. of Workers’ Compensation
Poor
Fair
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
10.
A Walk Through an Efficient Medical-Legal Office
Poor
Fair
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
Daphne Carrico, Feiwell Medical Group
Poor
Fair
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
11.
2018 Changes in Workers' Compensation Affecting Orthopaedic Practices
Poor
Fair
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
Sue Honor-Vangerov, Esq.
Poor
Fair
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
Sarah Moray, DaisyBill
Poor
Fair
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
Educational Merit
12.
Please rate the extent of your knowledge of the subject matter covered before and after this meeting;
No knowledge
Fair
Satisfactory
Good
Expert
Before the meeting
No knowledge
Fair
Satisfactory
Good
Expert
After the meeting
No knowledge
Fair
Satisfactory
Good
Expert
To what extent do you think you will be able to apply the information
from this meeting in your practice?
No knowledge
Fair
Satisfactory
Good
Expert
13.
Cultural Competency:
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Issues in cultural and linguistic competency (e.g. differences in prevalence, diagnosis, treatment in diverse population; linguistic skills; pertinent cultural data) were adequately addressed in this activity:
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
14.
Resources on cultural and linguistic competency have been included in the meeting presentations and materials. How can we further meet your educational needs in this area?
15.
What barriers do you see to implementing changes that you learned about during the presentations today: