Skip to content
Daily Faculty Evaluation
Saturday, April 25, 2026
27
th
Annual National Conference on Fetal Monitoring
Las Vegas, Nevada
Horseshoe Las Vegas
April 23-25, 2026
Please rate each category.
Degree
ARNP
BSN
CNM
DNP
DO
FNP
MBBS
MD
MS
MSN
PA
PA-C
PhD
PNP
RN
RNC
WHNP
Other (please specify)
Specialty
Adolescent Medicine
Ambulatory Care
Emergency Medicine
Family Medicine
General Practice
General Surgery
Gynecology
Health Informatics
Hospital Medicine
Internal Medicine
Labor and Delivery
Neonatology
Nutrition
OB/GYN
Obstetrics
Orthopedics
Pediatric Emergency
Pediatrics
Perinatology
Urgent Care
Urology
Women’s Health
Other (please specify)
Every Note Counts: Effective Charting in L&D | Rebecca L. Cypher, MSN, PNNP
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Content of lecture
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Lecture was clinically relevant
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Delivery of lecture
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Session materials
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Speaker met their stated objectives
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Audio/visual (slides, etc.)
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Specific comments:
Pit Is Not the Problem: Understanding Uterine Activity in Labor | Lisa A. Miller, CNM, JD
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Content of lecture
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Lecture was clinically relevant
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Delivery of lecture
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Session materials
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Speaker met their stated objectives
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Audio/visual (slides, etc.)
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Specific comments:
Read Between the Beats: Impact of Off-Label Medications on FHR Patterns | Rebecca L. Cypher, MSN, PNNP
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Content of lecture
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Lecture was clinically relevant
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Delivery of lecture
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Session materials
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Speaker met their stated objectives
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Audio/visual (slides, etc.)
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Specific comments:
Legal Issues: An Overview of Litigation in EFM | Adam Snyder, JD
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Content of lecture
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Lecture was clinically relevant
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Delivery of lecture
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Session materials
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Speaker met their stated objectives
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Audio/visual (slides, etc.)
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Specific comments:
Mock Deposition | Faculty Panel
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Content of lecture
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Lecture was clinically relevant
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Delivery of lecture
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Session materials
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Speaker met their stated objectives
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Audio/visual (slides, etc.)
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Specific comments:
