NAPA Net - Polling Places 101819

The Management of "Managed" Accounts

Target-date funds continue to garner a whole new generation of defaulted contribution flows – and yet interest continues to expand in managed accounts.

Despite a plethora of options, the vast majority of target-date fund assets has wound up in the hands of a small number of providers.  Meanwhile, as participants and their retirement savings “age”, there is a growing sense that they may not be well-served by the convenience and (relative) simplicity of “off the shelf” TDF solutions.

Or, as one reader recently put it, “I feel like managed accounts serve the same purpose as target date funds and providers are pushing them to charge fees.  Am I missing something?”

This week, we’d like to know how these asset allocation options – managed accounts and target-date funds – fit into your practice, and if you foresee any changes ahead.
1.Are both managed accounts and target-date funds in your fund recommendations?
2.Has that approach changed in the past two years?
3.If you use both managed accounts and target-date funds, what has been the trend in your recommendations?
4.Which factor(s) are driving your TDF/managed account decision (check all that apply)?
5.Which factor is PRIMARILY driving your TDF/managed account decision (generally speaking)?
6.Other comments about managed accounts, target-date funds, the use of managed accounts and target-date funds, the factors influencing the use of managed accounts and target-date funds, the trends in the use of managed accounts and target-date funds, changes in the trends regarding the use of managed accounts and target-date funds, or life in general?
7.What is your role working with retirement plans?
8.What size plans do you PRIMARILY work with?
9.Suggestions for future survey questions?  What would YOU like to ask other NAPA-Net readers?
Privacy & Cookie Notice