Javascript is required for this site to function, please enable.
Page: KOOP Peer Evaluation
1. Name of Evaluator
 answered question11
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
Name:
[ShowReplies]
100.0%11

2. Date of evaluation
 answered question11
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Count
[ShowReplies]11

3. Program evaluated
 answered question11
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Count
[ShowReplies]11

4. Original air date
 answered question11
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Count
[ShowReplies]11

5. Programmer of record
 answered question11
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Count
[ShowReplies]11

6. Programmer of show evaluated (if different from above)
 answered question6
 
skipped question
5
 Response
Count
[ShowReplies]6

Page: Section 1: Basic On Air Technique
7. Was the legal ID given ("K-O-O-P Hornsby Austin")?
 answered question11
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
Yes
90.9%10
No
9.1%1

8. How many times was the station identified (not necessarily the legal ID)?
 answered question11
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
1-2 times
54.5%6
3-4 times
36.4%4
5+ times
9.1%1

9. Was the website mentioned (koop.org)?
 answered question11
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
Yes
72.7%8
No
27.3%3

10. How was the programmer's volume?
 answered question11
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
Soft 0.0%0
Normal
100.0%11
Loud 0.0%0

11. How was the programmer's rate of speaking?
 answered question11
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
Slow 0.0%0
Normal
90.9%10
Fast
9.1%1

12. How was the programmer's vocal expression or tone?
 answered question11
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
Monotone 0.0%0
Average
45.5%5
Expressive
54.5%6

13. How often were vocal pauses heard ("um," "uh," "and-uh")?
 answered question11
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
Never
9.1%1
Rarely
81.8%9
Often
9.1%1

14. How was the programmer's pronunciation/articulation?
 answered question11
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
Clear
81.8%9
Occasional Lapse
18.2%2
Unclear 0.0%0

15. Were there any indecencies?
 answered question11
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
Yes 0.0%0
No
100.0%11

16. Were there any calls to action?
 answered question11
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
Yes
9.1%1
No
90.9%10
If yes, please give specific examples
[ShowReplies]		1

17. On a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being the best, please rate the programmer's overall on air technique.
 answered question11
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
1 0.0%0
2 0.0%0
3
9.1%1
4
63.6%7
5
27.3%3
Use the space below for comments. If you scored a 3 or lower, please suggest how the programmer might improve.
[ShowReplies]		6

18. Please add any additional comments regarding the programmer's basic on air technique.
 answered question6
 
skipped question
5
 Response
Count
[ShowReplies]6

Page: Section 2: In-Depth On Air Technique
19. How were the transitions into and out of the program?
 answered question11
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
1 0.0%0
2
9.1%1
3 0.0%0
4
18.2%2
5
72.7%8
N/A 0.0%0
Comments:
[ShowReplies]		6

20. How is the programmer's reading ability?
 answered question11
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
1 0.0%0
2 0.0%0
3 0.0%0
4
18.2%2
5
27.3%3
N/A
54.5%6
Comments:
[ShowReplies]		5

21. How is the pacing/flow or the program?
 answered question11
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
1 0.0%0
2 0.0%0
3
9.1%1
4
27.3%3
5
63.6%7
N/A 0.0%0
Comments:
[ShowReplies]		8

22. How is the programmer's interviewing technique?
 answered question11
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
1 0.0%0
2 0.0%0
3 0.0%0
4
27.3%3
5
72.7%8
N/A 0.0%0
Comments:
[ShowReplies]		8

23. How was the programmer's call-in technique?
 answered question11
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
1 0.0%0
2 0.0%0
3 0.0%0
4 0.0%0
5 0.0%0
N/A
100.0%11
Comments:
[ShowReplies]		1

24. How is the programmer's over-all radio hygiene (mic volume, segue, familiarity with the board)?
 answered question11
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
1 0.0%0
2 0.0%0
3
9.1%1
4 0.0%0
5
81.8%9
N/A
9.1%1
Comments:
[ShowReplies]		6

25. How well did the programmer offer any interesting comments or data to gain the audience's attention?
 answered question11
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
1 0.0%0
2 0.0%0
3 0.0%0
4
36.4%4
5
63.6%7
N/A 0.0%0
Comments:
[ShowReplies]		7

26. How clearly did the programmer define areas of discussion?
 answered question11
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
1 0.0%0
2 0.0%0
3 0.0%0
4
36.4%4
5
63.6%7
N/A 0.0%0
Comments:
[ShowReplies]		4

27. How thoroughly were topics developed?
 answered question11
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
1 0.0%0
2 0.0%0
3 0.0%0
4
27.3%3
5
72.7%8
N/A 0.0%0
Comments:
[ShowReplies]		3

28. How effective was the use of information (i.e. examples to clarify facts)?
 answered question11
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
1 0.0%0
2 0.0%0
3 0.0%0
4
18.2%2
5
54.5%6
N/A
27.3%3
Comments:
[ShowReplies]		4

29. Was the topic choice suitable to the program?
 answered question11
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
1 0.0%0
2 0.0%0
3 0.0%0
4 0.0%0
5
100.0%11
N/A 0.0%0
Comments:
[ShowReplies]		3

30. Rate the content presented in the program.
 answered question11
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
1 0.0%0
2 0.0%0
3 0.0%0
4
18.2%2
5
81.8%9
N/A 0.0%0
Comments:
[ShowReplies]		5

31. Rate the quality of research.
 answered question11
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
1 0.0%0
2 0.0%0
3 0.0%0
4
18.2%2
5
72.7%8
N/A
9.1%1
Comments:
[ShowReplies]		1

32. Rate the variety of sources.
 answered question11
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
1 0.0%0
2 0.0%0
3 0.0%0
4
18.2%2
5
45.5%5
N/A
36.4%4
Comments: 0

33. How likely are you to hear similar content on other Austin radio stations (1 being very likely and 5 being not at all likely)?
 answered question11
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
1 0.0%0
2 0.0%0
3 0.0%0
4
18.2%2
5
81.8%9
Comments:
[ShowReplies]		5

Page: Section 3: Show Compliance
34. Is this show unique compared to other shows on KOOP (1 being not very unique and 5 being very unique)?
 answered question11
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
1 0.0%0
2 0.0%0
3 0.0%0
4
27.3%3
5
72.7%8
Comments:
[ShowReplies]		3

35. How well does the program facilitate KOOP's mission?
 answered question11
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
1 0.0%0
2 0.0%0
3 0.0%0
4 0.0%0
5
100.0%11
Comments:
[ShowReplies]		2

36. Does the show enhance KOOP's image in the community?
 answered question11
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
1 0.0%0
2 0.0%0
3 0.0%0
4 0.0%0
5
100.0%11
N/A 0.0%0
Comments:
[ShowReplies]		3

Page: Section 4: Music (If Applicable)
37. Is the music consistent with the show description?
 answered question11
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
1 0.0%0
2 0.0%0
3 0.0%0
4 0.0%0
5
9.1%1
N/A
90.9%10
Comments:
[ShowReplies]		1

38. Does the programmer sound informative about the music played?
 answered question11
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
1 0.0%0
2 0.0%0
3 0.0%0
4 0.0%0
5
9.1%1
N/A
90.9%10
Other (please specify)
[ShowReplies]		1

39. How did the music flow? How were the transitions and segues?
 answered question11
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
1 0.0%0
2 0.0%0
3 0.0%0
4 0.0%0
5
9.1%1
N/A
90.9%10
Comments:
[ShowReplies]		1

Page: Section 5: Additional Comments
40. Use the space below for any additional comments about the program/programmer.
 answered question11
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Count
[ShowReplies]11

Find...
Show replies
Hide replies