Javascript is required for this site to function, please enable.
Page: Introduction
1. YOUR NAME:
 answered question60
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Count
[ShowReplies]60

2. YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS:
 answered question60
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Count
[ShowReplies]60

3. YOUR ROLE: Please indicate your role in managing or using FDLP collections.
 answered question60
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
Library Dean / Director
18.3%11
Documents Specialist
60.0%36
Public Service / Other Reference Librarian (not a documents specialist)
8.3%5
Collections Manager
1.7%1
Technical Services / Cataloger
6.7%4
Library User (not a librarian / library staff) 0.0%0
Other (please specify)
[ShowReplies]
5.0%3

4. REGIONAL? SELECTIVE? OTHER? Please indicate if you work at a Regional Depository Library, a Selective Depository Library, or are otherwise interested in FDLP collection management issues.
 answered question60
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
I work at a REGIONAL Depository Library.
31.7%19
I work at a SELECTIVE Depository Library.
66.7%40
I do not work in a Depository Library but am otherwise interested in FDLP collection management issues. 0.0%0
Other (please specify)
[ShowReplies]
1.7%1

5. YOUR LOCATION. Please enter the 2-letter postal code for the state where you reside.
 answered question60
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Count
[ShowReplies]60

6. YOUR OVERALL SUPPORT FOR THE PROPOSAL: After reading the proposal in its entirety, please rank your overall opinion/support for the ASERL Proposed Guidelines for Managing FDLP Collections in the Southeast. (We'll ask for your feedback on specific aspects of the proposal on the following pages.)
 answered question60
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
Strongly support
48.3%29
Moderately support
30.0%18
Neutral / No opinion
6.7%4
Moderately oppose
15.0%9
Strongly oppose 0.0%0
Comments
[ShowReplies]		20

Page: Feedback on Basic Tenets of the Proposal
1. Feedback re: THE EXISTING FDLP COLLECTIONS ARE AN ASSET TO THE REGION'S LIBRARIES, NOT JUST TO LIBRARIES WITHIN THE STATE WHERE THE DOCUMENTS ARE CURRENTLY HOUSED. [See Section I, pages 1-2 of the proposal.] Please indicate your support/agreement with or opposition/disagreement with this tenet of the proposal.
 answered question56
 
skipped question
4
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
Strongly Support/ Strongly Agree
87.5%49
Moderately Support / Moderately Agree
8.9%5
Neutral / No opinion
3.6%2
Moderately Oppose / Moderately Disagree 0.0%0
Strongly Oppose / Strongly Disagree 0.0%0
Comments
[ShowReplies]		6

2. Feedback re: THE BEST MEANS FOR PROVIDING PUBLIC ACCESS TO FDLP COLLECTIONS IS VIA ONLINE/DIGITAL ACCESS. [See Section I, page 2 of the proposal.] Please indicate your support/agreement with or opposition/disagreement with this tenet of the proposal.
 answered question57
 
skipped question
3
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
Strongly Support/ Strongly Agree
61.4%35
Moderately Support / Moderately Agree
28.1%16
Neutral / No opinion
3.5%2
Moderately Oppose / Moderately Disagree
7.0%4
Strongly Oppose / Strongly Disagree 0.0%0
Comments
[ShowReplies]		19

3. Feedback re: EXPANDING ASERL's "CENTER OF EXCELLENCE" CONCEPT IS A USEFUL MEANS FOR BUILDING COMPREHENSIVE-AS-POSSIBLE FDLP COLLECTIONS. [See Section I, #2 pages 3 - 4 and Section III pages 5 - 6 of the proposal.] Please indicate your support/agreement with or opposition/disagreement with this tenet of the proposal.
 answered question57
 
skipped question
3
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
Strongly Support/ Strongly Agree
59.6%34
Moderately Support / Moderately Agree
33.3%19
Neutral / No opinion
1.8%1
Moderately Oppose / Moderately Disagree
5.3%3
Strongly Oppose / Strongly Disagree 0.0%0
Comments
[ShowReplies]		20

Page: Feedback on Specific Aspects of the Proposal
1. Feedback re: Section I: BACKGROUND. [See pages 1 - 2 of the proposal.] Please indicate your support/agreement with or opposition/disagreement with this section of the proposal.
 answered question47
 
skipped question
13
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
Strongly Support/ Strongly Agree
68.1%32
Moderately Support / Moderately Agree
19.1%9
Neutral / No opinion
10.6%5
Moderately Oppose / Moderately Disagree
2.1%1
Strongly Oppose / Strongly Disagree 0.0%0
Comments
[ShowReplies]		7

2. Feedback re: Section II: PLANNING FOR FEDERAL DOCUMENTS COLLECTIONS IN THE SOUTHEAST. [See page 2 of the proposal.] Please indicate your support/agreement with or opposition/disagreement with this section of the proposal.
 answered question47
 
skipped question
13
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
Strongly Support/ Strongly Agree
66.0%31
Moderately Support / Moderately Agree
19.1%9
Neutral / No opinion
8.5%4
Moderately Oppose / Moderately Disagree
6.4%3
Strongly Oppose / Strongly Disagree 0.0%0
Comments
[ShowReplies]		10

3. Feedback re: Section II-1. DEFINING A COMPREHENSIVE FDLP COLLECTION. [See page 3 of the proposal.] Please indicate your support/agreement with or opposition/disagreement with this section of the proposal.
 answered question45
 
skipped question
15
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
Strongly Support/ Strongly Agree
71.1%32
Moderately Support / Moderately Agree
20.0%9
Neutral / No opinion
4.4%2
Moderately Oppose / Moderately Disagree
4.4%2
Strongly Oppose / Strongly Disagree 0.0%0
Comments
[ShowReplies]		12

4. Feedback re: Section II-2. ESTABLISHING COMPREHENSIVE FDLP COLLECTIONS IN THE SOUTHEAST REGION. [See pages 3 - 5 of the proposal.] Please indicate your support/agreement with or opposition/disagreement with this section of the proposal.
 answered question44
 
skipped question
16
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
Strongly Support/ Strongly Agree
65.9%29
Moderately Support / Moderately Agree
25.0%11
Neutral / No opinion
6.8%3
Moderately Oppose / Moderately Disagree 0.0%0
Strongly Oppose / Strongly Disagree
2.3%1
Comments
[ShowReplies]		15

5. Feedback re: Section II-3. COLLABORATIVE STORAGE. [See page 5 of the proposal.] Please indicate your support/agreement with or opposition/disagreement with this section of the proposal.
 answered question46
 
skipped question
14
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
Strongly Support/ Strongly Agree
63.0%29
Moderately Support / Moderately Agree
15.2%7
Neutral / No opinion
17.4%8
Moderately Oppose / Moderately Disagree
2.2%1
Strongly Oppose / Strongly Disagree
2.2%1
Comments
[ShowReplies]		13

6. Feedback re: Section III: CENTERS OF EXCELLENCE. [See pages 5 - 6 of the proposal.] Please indicate your support/agreement with or opposition/disagreement with this section of the proposal.
 answered question47
 
skipped question
13
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
Strongly Support/ Strongly Agree
74.5%35
Moderately Support / Moderately Agree
14.9%7
Neutral / No opinion
8.5%4
Moderately Oppose / Moderately Disagree 0.0%0
Strongly Oppose / Strongly Disagree
2.1%1
Comments
[ShowReplies]		16

7. Feedback re: Section IV: LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENTS. [See pages 6 - 7 of the proposal.] Please indicate if you found this section of the proposal to be helpful.
 answered question46
 
skipped question
14
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
Very Helpful
56.5%26
Moderately Helpful
23.9%11
Neutral / No opinion
13.0%6
Not Very Helpful
4.3%2
Not Helpful At All
2.2%1
Comments
[ShowReplies]		9

8. Feedback re: Section V: DISPOSITION OF FEDERAL DOCUMENTS IN THE SOUTHEAST REGION: PROPOSED PROCESS. (introductory section) [See pages 7 - 8 of the proposal.] Please indicate your support/agreement with or opposition/disagreement with this section of the proposal.
 answered question45
 
skipped question
15
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
Strongly Support/ Strongly Agree
51.1%23
Moderately Support / Moderately Agree
22.2%10
Neutral / No opinion
6.7%3
Moderately Oppose / Moderately Disagree
17.8%8
Strongly Oppose / Strongly Disagree
2.2%1
Comments
[ShowReplies]		19

9. Feedback re: Section V-1. REGIONAL PRIORITIES. [See page 8 of the proposal.] Please indicate your support/agreement with or opposition/disagreement with this section of the proposal.
 answered question44
 
skipped question
16
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
Strongly Support/ Strongly Agree
56.8%25
Moderately Support / Moderately Agree
22.7%10
Neutral / No opinion
6.8%3
Moderately Oppose / Moderately Disagree
9.1%4
Strongly Oppose / Strongly Disagree
4.5%2
Comments
[ShowReplies]		12

10. Feedback re: Section V-2. DISPOSITION LIST CONTENTS. [See page 8 of the proposal.] Please indicate your support/agreement with or opposition/disagreement with this section of the proposal.
 answered question45
 
skipped question
15
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
Strongly Support/ Strongly Agree
44.4%20
Moderately Support / Moderately Agree
22.2%10
Neutral / No opinion
4.4%2
Moderately Oppose / Moderately Disagree
20.0%9
Strongly Oppose / Strongly Disagree
8.9%4
Comments
[ShowReplies]		23

11. Feedback re: Section V-3. MICROFICHE EXCEPTION. [See page 9 of the proposal.] Please indicate your support/agreement with or opposition/disagreement with this section of the proposal.
 answered question46
 
skipped question
14
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
Strongly Support/ Strongly Agree
52.2%24
Moderately Support / Moderately Agree
23.9%11
Neutral / No opinion
6.5%3
Moderately Oppose / Moderately Disagree
8.7%4
Strongly Oppose / Strongly Disagree
8.7%4
Comments
[ShowReplies]		20

12. Feedback re: Section V-4. SUPERSEDED DOCUMENTS EXCEPTION. [See page 9 of the proposal.] Please indicate your support/agreement with or opposition/disagreement with this section of the proposal.
 answered question47
 
skipped question
13
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
Strongly Support/ Strongly Agree
74.5%35
Moderately Support / Moderately Agree
10.6%5
Neutral / No opinion
6.4%3
Moderately Oppose / Moderately Disagree
4.3%2
Strongly Oppose / Strongly Disagree
4.3%2
Comments
[ShowReplies]		9

13. Feedback re: Section V-5. APPROVED REGIONAL PRIORITY EXCEPTION. [See pages 9 - 10 of the proposal.] Please indicate your support/agreement with or opposition/disagreement with this section of the proposal.
 answered question46
 
skipped question
14
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
Strongly Support/ Strongly Agree
60.9%28
Moderately Support / Moderately Agree
21.7%10
Neutral / No opinion
6.5%3
Moderately Oppose / Moderately Disagree
8.7%4
Strongly Oppose / Strongly Disagree
2.2%1
Comments
[ShowReplies]		15

14. Feedback re: Section V-6. RARE OR SIGNIFICANT PUBLICATIONS EXCEPTION. [See page 10 of the proposal.] Please indicate your support/agreement with or opposition/disagreement with this section of the proposal.
 answered question46
 
skipped question
14
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
Strongly Support/ Strongly Agree
78.3%36
Moderately Support / Moderately Agree
10.9%5
Neutral / No opinion
2.2%1
Moderately Oppose / Moderately Disagree
8.7%4
Strongly Oppose / Strongly Disagree 0.0%0
Comments
[ShowReplies]		12

15. Feedback re: Section V-7. FLORIDA EXCEPTION. [See pages 10 - 11 of the proposal.] Please indicate your support/agreement with or opposition/disagreement with this section of the proposal.
 answered question46
 
skipped question
14
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
Strongly Support/ Strongly Agree
45.7%21
Moderately Support / Moderately Agree
15.2%7
Neutral / No opinion
23.9%11
Moderately Oppose / Moderately Disagree 0.0%0
Strongly Oppose / Strongly Disagree
15.2%7
Comments
[ShowReplies]		14

16. Feedback re: Section V-8. DISPOSAL. [See page 11 of the proposal.] Please indicate your support/agreement with or opposition/disagreement with this section of the proposal.
 answered question45
 
skipped question
15
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
Strongly Support/ Strongly Agree
64.4%29
Moderately Support / Moderately Agree
13.3%6
Neutral / No opinion
20.0%9
Moderately Oppose / Moderately Disagree 0.0%0
Strongly Oppose / Strongly Disagree
2.2%1
Comments
[ShowReplies]		11

17. Feedback re: Section VI: REQUESTING ITEMS FROM DISPOSITION LISTS. [See page 11 of the proposal.] Please indicate your support/agreement with or opposition/disagreement with this section of the proposal.
 answered question47
 
skipped question
13
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
Strongly Support/ Strongly Agree
55.3%26
Moderately Support / Moderately Agree
21.3%10
Neutral / No opinion
12.8%6
Moderately Oppose / Moderately Disagree
8.5%4
Strongly Oppose / Strongly Disagree
2.1%1
Comments
[ShowReplies]		12

18. Feedback re: Section VII: DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL COLLECTIONS: PROPOSED PROCESS. [See pages 11 - 12 of the proposal.] Please indicate your support/agreement with or opposition/disagreement with this section of the proposal.
 answered question46
 
skipped question
14
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
Strongly Support/ Strongly Agree
56.5%26
Moderately Support / Moderately Agree
19.6%9
Neutral / No opinion
4.3%2
Moderately Oppose / Moderately Disagree
8.7%4
Strongly Oppose / Strongly Disagree
10.9%5
Comments
[ShowReplies]		17

19. Feedback re: Section VIII: REFERENCES. [See pages 12 - 13 of the proposal.] Please indicate if you found this section of the proposal to be helpful.
 answered question45
 
skipped question
15
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
Very Helpful
44.4%20
Moderately Helpful
31.1%14
Neutral / No opinion
22.2%10
Not Very Helpful
2.2%1
Not Helpful At All 0.0%0
Comments
[ShowReplies]		2

20. OTHER COMMENTS / FEEDBACK: Please enter any other comments / feedback here that is not included in the above sections.
 answered question22
 
skipped question
38
 Response
Count
[ShowReplies]22

Find...
Show replies
Hide replies