Javascript is required for this site to function, please enable.
Page: Contact Information
1. Please enter your name and either an e-mail address or phone number where we can reach you if there are any questions about this survey.
 answered question254
 
skipped question
17
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
 Name:
99.6%253
 Email Address:
96.1%244
 Phone Number:
92.1%234

2. County? (Required)
 answered question271
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
Anderson 0.0%0
Andrews
0.7%2
Angelina
0.4%1
Aransas
0.7%2
Archer 0.0%0
Armstrong 0.0%0
Atascosa
0.4%1
Austin
1.1%3
Bailey 0.0%0
Bandera
0.4%1
Bastrop
0.4%1
Baylor 0.0%0
Bee 0.0%0
Bell
0.7%2
Bexar 0.0%0
Blanco
1.1%3
Borden
0.4%1
Bosque
0.4%1
Bowie 0.0%0
Brazoria
0.7%2
Brazos
0.4%1
Brewster 0.0%0
Briscoe 0.0%0
Brooks 0.0%0
Brown
0.7%2
Burleson 0.0%0
Burnet
1.1%3
Caldwell
0.7%2
Calhoun
0.4%1
Callahan
0.4%1
Cameron
0.7%2
Camp
0.4%1
Carson
0.4%1
Cass
0.4%1
Castro 0.0%0
Chambers
0.4%1
Cherokee
0.7%2
Childress 0.0%0
Clay
0.4%1
Cochran
0.4%1
Coke
0.4%1
Coleman
0.4%1
Collin
0.4%1
Collingsworth
0.4%1
Colorado
0.4%1
Comal
0.4%1
Comanche
0.4%1
Concho 0.0%0
Cooke
1.1%3
Coryell
0.4%1
Cottle 0.0%0
Crane
0.4%1
Crockett 0.0%0
Crosby
0.4%1
Culberson 0.0%0
Dallam
0.4%1
Dallas
0.7%2
Dawson 0.0%0
Deaf Smith
0.4%1
Delta
0.4%1
Denton
1.1%3
DeWitt
0.4%1
Dickens
0.4%1
Dimmit
0.4%1
Donley
0.4%1
Duval 0.0%0
Eastland
0.4%1
Ector
0.4%1
Edwards
0.4%1
Ellis
1.5%4
El Paso 0.0%0
Erath 0.0%0
Falls 0.0%0
Fannin
0.4%1
Fayette 0.0%0
Fisher 0.0%0
Floyd
0.4%1
Foard 0.0%0
Fort Bend
0.7%2
Franklin
1.1%3
Freestone 0.0%0
Frio
0.7%2
Gaines
1.1%3
Galveston
0.7%2
Garza
0.4%1
Gillespie
0.7%2
Glasscock
0.4%1
Goliad
0.4%1
Gonzales
0.4%1
Gray 0.0%0
Grayson
0.7%2
Gregg 0.0%0
Grimes
0.4%1
Guadalupe
0.7%2
Hale
0.4%1
Hall
0.4%1
Hamilton
0.7%2
Hansford
0.4%1
Hardeman
0.4%1
Hardin 0.0%0
Harris 0.0%0
Harrison
0.7%2
Hartley
0.4%1
Haskell
0.7%2
Hays
0.7%2
Hemphill
0.4%1
Henderson
0.7%2
Hidalgo
0.4%1
Hill
0.4%1
Hockley
0.4%1
Hood
1.8%5
Hopkins
1.1%3
Houston
0.7%2
Howard
0.4%1
Hudspeth 0.0%0
Hunt
0.7%2
Hutchinson
1.1%3
Irion
0.7%2
Jack
0.4%1
Jackson
1.1%3
Jasper
1.1%3
Jeff Davis
0.7%2
Jefferson
1.1%3
Jim Hogg 0.0%0
Jim Wells
0.7%2
Johnson
0.4%1
Jones 0.0%0
Karnes 0.0%0
Kaufman
0.7%2
Kendall
1.1%3
Kenedy 0.0%0
Kent 0.0%0
Kerr
0.7%2
Kimble
0.7%2
King 0.0%0
Kinney
0.4%1
Kleberg 0.0%0
Knox
0.4%1
Lamar 0.0%0
Lamb 0.0%0
Lampasas
0.4%1
La Salle 0.0%0
Lavaca
0.7%2
Lee
0.4%1
Leon
0.7%2
Liberty
0.4%1
Limestone
0.4%1
Lipscomb 0.0%0
Live Oak
0.7%2
Llano
0.4%1
Loving 0.0%0
Lubbock
0.7%2
Lynn 0.0%0
McCulloch
0.4%1
McLennan
0.4%1
McMullen 0.0%0
Madison
0.4%1
Marion
0.4%1
Martin
0.4%1
Mason
0.7%2
Matagorda
0.4%1
Maverick
0.4%1
Medina
0.4%1
Menard
0.4%1
Midland
0.4%1
Milam
0.7%2
Mills
0.4%1
Mitchell 0.0%0
Montague 0.0%0
Montgomery
0.4%1
Moore
0.4%1
Morris 0.0%0
Motley
0.4%1
Nacogdoches 0.0%0
Navarro
0.4%1
Newton
0.4%1
Nolan
0.4%1
Nueces
0.4%1
Ochiltree 0.0%0
Oldham
0.7%2
Orange
0.7%2
Palo Pinto 0.0%0
Panola
0.4%1
Parker
0.4%1
Parmer 0.0%0
Pecos
0.7%2
Polk
0.7%2
Potter 0.0%0
Presidio 0.0%0
Rains
1.5%4
Randall
0.4%1
Reagan 0.0%0
Real 0.0%0
Red River
0.4%1
Reeves
0.4%1
Refugio
0.4%1
Roberts
0.7%2
Robertson 0.0%0
Rockwall
0.4%1
Runnels 0.0%0
Rusk
0.4%1
Sabine 0.0%0
San Augustine 0.0%0
San Jacinto
0.4%1
San Patricio
0.7%2
San Saba 0.0%0
Schleicher
0.4%1
Scurry
0.4%1
Shackelford
0.4%1
Shelby
0.4%1
Sherman
0.7%2
Smith
0.4%1
Somervell
0.4%1
Starr
0.4%1
Stephens
0.4%1
Sterling
0.4%1
Stonewall
0.4%1
Sutton
0.4%1
Swisher
0.7%2
Tarrant
0.4%1
Taylor
1.5%4
Terrell
0.7%2
Terry 0.0%0
Throckmorton 0.0%0
Titus
0.4%1
Tom Green
0.7%2
Travis
0.7%2
Trinity
0.4%1
Tyler
0.7%2
Upshur 0.0%0
Upton
0.4%1
Uvalde 0.0%0
Val Verde 0.0%0
Van Zandt
0.4%1
Victoria 0.0%0
Walker
0.7%2
Waller
0.4%1
Ward
0.4%1
Washington
0.7%2
Webb
0.4%1
Wharton
0.4%1
Wheeler 0.0%0
Wichita
0.7%2
Wilbarger 0.0%0
Willacy 0.0%0
Williamson
0.4%1
Wilson
0.4%1
Winkler
0.4%1
Wise
0.7%2
Wood 0.0%0
Yoakum
0.4%1
Young
0.7%2
Zapata
0.4%1
Zavala 0.0%0

Page: Precinct or Unit Road System
3. Chapter 252, Transportation Code, contains four subchapters that define the different systems of county road management available to counties in Texas. Under which type of road management system is your county currently operating?
 answered question264
 
skipped question
7
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
A. Subchapter A. Ex Officio Road Commissioner System – A county commissioner is the ex officio road commissioner of the county commissioner's precinct.
59.8%158
B. Subchapter B. Road Commissioner System – A commissioners court may employ not more than four road commissioners.
8.7%23
C. Subchapter C. Road Superintendent System – The commissioners court of a county may appoint a road superintendent for the county or one superintendent in each county commissioner's precinct by an order made at a regular term of the court.
4.2%11
D. Subchapter D. County Road Department System (aka "Unit Road System") – The county road department, administered by the county road engineer, is responsible for the construction and maintenance of county roads as a whole without regard to commissioners’ precincts.
27.3%72
 Comment30

Page: Counties Operating a Unit Road System
4. On the previous page you indicated that your county uses a Unit Road System, in approximately what year did your county adopt that system?
 answered question67
 
skipped question
204
 Response
Average		Response
Total		Response
Count
 Year 1,981.96132,79167

Page: Counties Operating under the Precinct System
5. On the previous question you indicated that your county uses a Precinct System, has your county ever used a version of the Unit Road System?
 answered question185
 
skipped question
86
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
Yes
9.7%18
No
82.7%153
Unknown
7.6%14

6. If you answered YES, approximately when did your county start and stop using a Unit Road System?
 answered question14
 
skipped question
257
 Response
Average		Response
Total		Response
Count
 Year started: 1,987.1525,83313
 Year ended: 1,988.6019,88610

Page: Comments?
7. Thank you for your time! Please use this space to provide any comments you might have about this survey.
 answered question46
 
skipped question
225
 Response
Count
 46