Page: 2008 NCB ESA Meeting Evaluation
| 1. How long have you been a member of the Entomological Society of America? (Any branch) |
|---|
| | answered question | 163 |
|---|
| skipped question | 0 |
|---|
| | Response Percent | Response Count |
|---|
| 0-5 years | | 17.8% | 29 |
| 6-10 years | | 14.1% | 23 |
| 11-20 years | | 20.9% | 34 |
| >20 years | | 47.2% | 77 |
| 2. How long have you been a member of the North Central Branch? |
|---|
| | answered question | 163 |
|---|
| skipped question | 0 |
|---|
| | Response Percent | Response Count |
|---|
| 0-5 years | | 25.8% | 42 |
| 6-10 years | | 19.0% | 31 |
| 11-20 years | | 23.9% | 39 |
| >20 years | | 31.3% | 51 |
| 3. Please indicate your membership category. |
|---|
| | answered question | 159 |
|---|
| skipped question | 4 |
|---|
| | Response Percent | Response Count |
|---|
| Regular member | | 81.8% | 130 |
| Student member | | 13.8% | 22 |
| Student Transition member | | 2.5% | 4 |
| Emeritus member | | 1.9% | 3 |
| 4. Please indicate your home state or province. |
|---|
| | answered question | 158 |
|---|
| skipped question | 5 |
|---|
| | Response Percent | Response Count |
|---|
| Colorado | | 6.3% | 10 |
| Illinois | | 10.8% | 17 |
| Indiana | | 10.1% | 16 |
| Iowa | | 12.0% | 19 |
| Kansas | | 3.8% | 6 |
| Kentucky | | 5.1% | 8 |
| Manitoba | | 0.6% | 1 |
| Michigan | | 6.3% | 10 |
| Minnesota | | 6.3% | 10 |
| Missouri | | 6.3% | 10 |
| Nebraska | | 10.1% | 16 |
| North Dakota | | 3.8% | 6 |
| Ohio | | 10.8% | 17 |
| Ontario | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Saskatchewan | | 0.0% | 0 |
| South Dakota | | 2.5% | 4 |
| Wisconsin | | 5.1% | 8 |
| 5. Please indicate which branch meetings you have attended during the last 10 years. (Check all that apply) |
|---|
| | answered question | 119 |
|---|
| skipped question | 44 |
|---|
| | Response Percent | Response Count |
|---|
| 1999, Des Moines, IA | | 39.5% | 47 |
| 2000, Minneapolis, MN | | 40.3% | 48 |
| 2001, Fort Collins, CO | | 33.6% | 40 |
| 2002, East Lansing, MI | | 42.0% | 50 |
| 2003, Madison, WI | | 33.6% | 40 |
| 2004, Kansas City, MO | | 48.7% | 58 |
| 2005, West Lafayette, IN | | 53.8% | 64 |
| 2006, Bloomington, IL | | 47.1% | 56 |
| 2007, Winnipeg, Manitoba | | 36.1% | 43 |
| 2008, Columbus, OH | | 52.1% | 62 |
| 6. At the recent NC branch meeting, rate the number of presentations on "New tools and technologies (i.e. transgenics, genomics, GIS)".
|
|---|
| | answered question | 88 |
|---|
| skipped question | 75 |
|---|
| | Response Percent | Response Count |
|---|
| Too much | | 4.5% | 4 |
| About right | | 78.4% | 69 |
| Too little | | 17.0% | 15 |
| 7. At the recent NC branch meeting, rate the number of presentations on "Field crops (i.e. corn, soybeans, forage)".
|
|---|
| | answered question | 89 |
|---|
| skipped question | 74 |
|---|
| | Response Percent | Response Count |
|---|
| Too much | | 23.6% | 21 |
| About right | | 68.5% | 61 |
| Too little | | 7.9% | 7 |
| 8. At the recent NC branch meeting, rate the number of presentations on "Other crops (i.e. vegetables, fruits, other specialty crops)".
|
|---|
| | answered question | 90 |
|---|
| skipped question | 73 |
|---|
| | Response Percent | Response Count |
|---|
| Too much | | 2.2% | 2 |
| About right | | 60.0% | 54 |
| Too little | | 37.8% | 34 |
| 9. At the recent NC branch meeting, rate the number of presentations on "Non-food commodities and systems (i.e. nurseries and ornamentals, urban, public health, forestry, natural environments)".
|
|---|
| | answered question | 87 |
|---|
| skipped question | 76 |
|---|
| | Response Percent | Response Count |
|---|
| Too much | | 3.4% | 3 |
| About right | | 48.3% | 42 |
| Too little | | 48.3% | 42 |
| 10. At the recent NC branch meeting, was the question and answer time associated with presentations...
|
|---|
| | answered question | 88 |
|---|
| skipped question | 75 |
|---|
| | Response Percent | Response Count |
|---|
| Too long | | 0.0% | 0 |
| About right | | 76.1% | 67 |
| Too short | | 23.9% | 21 |
| 11. At the recent NC branch meeting, was the structured social time (i.e. scheduled breaks) for conversation with presenters...
|
|---|
| | answered question | 91 |
|---|
| skipped question | 72 |
|---|
| | Response Percent | Response Count |
|---|
| Too long | | 0.0% | 0 |
| About right | | 79.1% | 72 |
| Too short | | 20.9% | 19 |
| 12. At the recent NC branch meeting, was the unstructured social time for conversations with collegues ...
|
|---|
| | answered question | 91 |
|---|
| skipped question | 72 |
|---|
| | Response Percent | Response Count |
|---|
| Too long | | 0.0% | 0 |
| About right | | 76.9% | 70 |
| Too short | | 23.1% | 21 |
| 1. What have been the main reasons for your attending NCB meetings in recent years? (Check all that apply) |
|---|
| | answered question | 116 |
|---|
| skipped question | 47 |
|---|
| | Response Percent | Response Count |
|---|
| Quality / relevance of the scientific presentations | | 46.6% | 54 |
| Regional networking | | 68.1% | 79 |
| Chance for students and new professionals to present themselves and their work | | 50.9% | 59 |
| Commitment to the branch | | 44.0% | 51 |
Show repliesOther reasons (please specify) | | 14.7% | 17 |
| 2. What have been the main reasons for your NOT attending NCB meetings in recent years? (Check all that apply) |
|---|
| | answered question | 130 |
|---|
| skipped question | 33 |
|---|
| | Response Percent | Response Count |
|---|
| Symposia and other presentations redundant with national ESA programs | | 13.8% | 18 |
| Symposia and other presentations not relevant to my work | | 24.6% | 32 |
| I network outside the NCB; few opportunities and/or colleagues at the NCB meeting | | 15.4% | 20 |
| Dates not conducive | | 36.9% | 48 |
| Budget constraints | | 53.1% | 69 |
Show repliesOther reasons (please specify) | | 26.2% | 34 |
| 3. How does the expense of the NCB meeting usually compare to expense of the National ESA meeting? |
|---|
| | answered question | 120 |
|---|
| skipped question | 43 |
|---|
| | Response Percent | Response Count |
|---|
| NCB meeting usually LESS expensive than National meeting | | 81.7% | 98 |
| NCB meeting usually MORE expensive than National meeting | | 1.7% | 2 |
| NCB meeting usually costs about the SAME as National meeting | | 16.7% | 20 |
| 4. I usually have funds for MYSELF to attend … |
|---|
| | answered question | 134 |
|---|
| skipped question | 29 |
|---|
| | Response Percent | Response Count |
|---|
| the NCB meeting only | | 3.7% | 5 |
| the National ESA meeting only | | 29.9% | 40 |
| both the NCB and the National ESA meeting | | 46.3% | 62 |
| neither the NCB nor the National ESA meeting | | 10.4% | 14 |
Show repliesAdditional comments on budget issues related to ESA meeting attendance? | | 9.7% | 13 |
| 5. I usually have funds to send my GRADUATE STUDENT(S) to … |
|---|
| | answered question | 78 |
|---|
| skipped question | 85 |
|---|
| | Response Percent | Response Count |
|---|
| the NCB meeting only | | 17.9% | 14 |
| the National ESA meeting only | | 12.8% | 10 |
| both the NCB and the National ESA meeting | | 19.2% | 15 |
| neither the NCB nor the National ESA meeting | | 20.5% | 16 |
Show repliesAdditional comments on budget issues related to ESA meeting attendance? | | 29.5% | 23 |
| 6. Should the NCB hold joint or overlapping meetings with other scientific societies? (Check all that apply) |
|---|
| | answered question | 106 |
|---|
| skipped question | 57 |
|---|
| | Response Percent | Response Count |
|---|
| No | | 45.3% | 48 |
Show repliesYes, try partnering with these societies... | | 55.7% | 59 |
| 7. To improve the appeal of the NCB meeting, which of the following proposed organizational changes do you support?
(Choose all that apply) |
|---|
| | answered question | 134 |
|---|
| skipped question | 29 |
|---|
| | Response Percent | Response Count |
|---|
| Hold the NCB meeting at easily accessible central locations instead of rotating through all the states in the region. | | 42.5% | 57 |
| Hold the 2010 meeting in Lexington, KY, in conjunction with the annual meeting of the American Mosquito Control Association. | | 31.3% | 42 |
| Revise the schedule of the meeting to begin Sunday evening and end Tuesday evening, even though this would result in more concurrent sessions. (The current norm is to begin on Sunday evening and end at noon on Wednesday.) | | 35.8% | 48 |
| Schedule the meeting so that it coincides with the most common dates for Spring Break for the major universities in the branch so that more graduate and undergraduate students might attend without missing classes. | | 44.0% | 59 |
| Keep everything pretty much as is … rotate locations among all states, keep the Sunday evening through Wednesday noon time frame, meet during the last 2 weeks of March, and meet independently of other societies. | | 21.6% | 29 |
Show repliesOther thoughts? | | 17.2% | 23 |
| 8. Should the annual NCB meeting include efforts to recruit students into entomology and provide opportunities for undergraduates interested in entomology? |
|---|
| | answered question | 140 |
|---|
| skipped question | 23 |
|---|
| | Response Percent | Response Count |
|---|
| Yes | | 80.0% | 112 |
| No | | 5.0% | 7 |
| No Opinion | | 15.0% | 21 |
| 1. Which of the following activities for student recruitment should be pursued? (Check all that apply) |
|---|
| | answered question | 110 |
|---|
| skipped question | 53 |
|---|
| | Response Percent | Response Count |
|---|
| A Sunday afternoon program to recruit high school students into entomology | | 42.7% | 47 |
| A Sunday and Monday program to recruit undergraduates from programs and universities not traditionally associated with entomology | | 44.5% | 49 |
| A special program for undergraduate research, possibly including scholarships, to recruit future graduate students into entomology | | 89.1% | 98 |
Show repliesOther suggestions ? (please specify) | | 10.9% | 12 |
| 1. Why should ESA not recruit students to the branch meeting? (Check all that apply) |
|---|
| | answered question | 9 |
|---|
| skipped question | 154 |
|---|
| | Response Percent | Response Count |
|---|
| The NCB should not be involved in student recruitment. | | 22.2% | 2 |
| The annual NCB meeting is not a proper venue for student recruitment. | | 44.4% | 4 |
| Difficult to offer a worthwhile recruitment program at the annual NCB meeting. | | 66.7% | 6 |
Show repliesOther reasons (please specify) | | 11.1% | 1 |
Page: Last page & question
| 1. Please offer any additional comments or suggestions to improve future NCB meetings. |
|---|
| | answered question | 31 |
|---|
| skipped question | 132 |
|---|
| | Response Count |
|---|
Show replies | 31 |