2011 Rowing Canada Conference Feedback Survey

We trust you enjoyed this year's RCA Conference & AGM. Thank you for taking the time to help us improve the Conference next year!

1. Overall, how relevant were the workshop topics?

	Extremely relevant	Relevant	Somewhat Relevant	Not Relevant
Topics	*Overall, how relevant were the workshop topics? Topics Extremely relevant	Topics Relevant	Topics Somewhat Relevant	Topics Not Relevant

Comments:

2. Name the session that was of most value to you:

Name the session that was of most value to you:

3. Name the session that was of little or no value to you:

Name the session that was of little or no value to you:

4. What was your impression of the presenters?

	Excellent	Good	Somewhat Good	Poor
Overall quality	*What was your impression of the presenters? Overall quality Excellent	Overall quality Good	Overall quality Somewhat Good	Overall quality Poor
Knowledge	Knowledge Excellent	Knowledge Good	Knowledge Somewhat Good	Knowledge Poor
Presentations	Presentations Excellent	Presentations Good	Presentations Somewhat Good	Presentations Poor
Materials	Materials Excellent	Materials Good	Materials Somewhat Good	Materials Poor

Comments:

5. If attending the full conference, what stream did you participate in mostly?

If attending the full conference, what stream did you participate in mostly? Stream 1 (Training to train rowers)

Stream 2 (NCCP – Level 3/RCA Performance Coach for credit)

Stream 3 (Training to compete rowers)

Stream 4 (Club development)

N/a

6. If you attended Stream 2, the purpose of the the Level 3/RCA Performance Coach pilot workshop is to prepare you to work more effectively with Train to Compete rowers as well as to pass the Level 3 practical evaluation. Please provide feedback on the Analyze Performance session:

	Extremely relevant	Relevant	Somewhat relevant	Not relevant	N/A
Materials	*If you attended Stream 2, the purpose of the the Level 3/RCA Performance Coach pilot workshop is to prepare you to work more effectively with Train to Compete rowers as well as to pass the Level 3 practical evaluation. Please provide feedback on the Analyze Performance session: Materials Extremely relevant	Materials Relevant	Materials Somewhat relevant	Materials Not relevant	Materials N/A
Content relevance	Content relevance Extremely relevant	Content relevance Relevant	Content relevance Somewhat relevant	Content relevance Not relevant	Content relevance N/A
Learning process (group activities, discussions and problem solving approach)	Learning process (group activities, discussions and problem solving approach) Extremely relevant	Learning process (group activities, discussions and problem solving approach) Relevant	Learning process (group activities, discussions and problem solving approach) Somewhat relevant	Learning process (group activities, discussions and problem solving approach) Not relevant	Learning process (group activities, discussions and problem solving approach) N/A
Use of content experts	Use of content experts Extremely relevant	Use of content experts Relevant	Use of content experts Somewhat relevant	Use of content experts Not relevant	Use of content experts N/A
Use of facilitator	Use of facilitator Extremely relevant	Use of facilitator Relevant	Use of facilitator Somewhat relevant	Use of facilitator Not relevant	Use of facilitator N/A

Comments:

7. Again for those who attended Stream 2, please provide feedback on the Selection session

	Extremely relevant	Relevant	Somewhat relevant	Not relevant	N/A
Materials	*Again for those who attended Stream 2, please provide feedback on the Selection session Materials Extremely relevant	Materials Relevant	Materials Somewhat relevant	Materials Not relevant	Materials N/A
Content relevance	Content relevance Extremely relevant	Content relevance Relevant	Content relevance Somewhat relevant	Content relevance Not relevant	Content relevance N/A
Learning process (group activities, discussions and problem solving approach)	Learning process (group activities, discussions and problem solving approach) Extremely relevant	Learning process (group activities, discussions and problem solving approach) Relevant	Learning process (group activities, discussions and problem solving approach) Somewhat relevant	Learning process (group activities, discussions and problem solving approach) Not relevant	Learning process (group activities, discussions and problem solving approach) N/A
Use of content experts	Use of content experts Extremely relevant	Use of content experts Relevant	Use of content experts Somewhat relevant	Use of content experts Not relevant	Use of content experts N/A
Use of facilitator	Use of facilitator Extremely relevant	Use of facilitator Relevant	Use of facilitator Somewhat relevant	Use of facilitator Not relevant	Use of facilitator N/A

Comments:

8. Did you find the RCA info sessions useful and informative?

	Useful	Somewhat Useful	Not Useful	Did not attend
LTAD update - skills event	*Did you find the RCA info sessions useful and informative? LTAD update - skills event Useful	LTAD update - skills event Somewhat Useful	LTAD update - skills event Not Useful	LTAD update - skills event Did not attend
NCCP transition - level 3 and PC	NCCP transition - level 3 and PC Useful	NCCP transition - level 3 and PC Somewhat Useful	NCCP transition - level 3 and PC Not Useful	NCCP transition - level 3 and PC Did not attend
NCCP evaluation for certification	NCCP evaluation for certification Useful	NCCP evaluation for certification Somewhat Useful	NCCP evaluation for certification Not Useful	NCCP evaluation for certification Did not attend
Junior lightweights	Junior lightweights Useful	Junior lightweights Somewhat Useful	Junior lightweights Not Useful	Junior lightweights Did not attend
Adaptive rowing	Adaptive rowing Useful	Adaptive rowing Somewhat Useful	Adaptive rowing Not Useful	Adaptive rowing Did not attend
High Performance Development program	High Performance Development program Useful	High Performance Development program Somewhat Useful	High Performance Development program Not Useful	High Performance Development program Did not attend

9. Did you find the "stream" system easy-to-follow?

Did you find the "stream" system easy-to-follow? Yes

Comments:

10. Would you like to see the club development stream continued?

Would you like to see the club development stream continued? Yes

n/a

Are there "Club development" topics you would like to see covered in the future?

11. Was the combination of the coaches' conference & AGM a positive move?

Was the combination of the coaches' conference & AGM a positive move? Yes

Unsure

Comments:

12. Did you attend the RCA AGM on Sunday?

Did you attend the RCA AGM on Sunday? Yes

If so, did you find the meeting to be efficient and productive?

2011 Rowing Canada Conference Feedback

1. Sessions

1. Overall, how relevant were the workshop topics?

2. Name the session that was of most value to you:

3. Name the session that was of little or no value to you:

4. What was your impression of the presenters?

5. If attending the full conference, what stream did you participate in mostly?

6. If you attended Stream 2, the purpose of the the Level 3/RCA Performance Coach pilot workshop is to prepare you to work more effectively with Train to Compete rowers as well as to pass the Level 3 practical evaluation. Please provide feedback on the Analyze Performance session:

7. Again for those who attended Stream 2, please provide feedback on the Selection session

8. Did you find the RCA info sessions useful and informative?

9. Did you find the "stream" system easy-to-follow?

10. Would you like to see the club development stream continued?

11. Was the combination of the coaches' conference & AGM a positive move?

12. Did you attend the RCA AGM on Sunday?