AC13: Celebrating Poetry Fridays Survey

Please complete your evaluation of the ALA Annual Conference program "Celebrating Poetry Fridays & Common Core Curriculum Connections." Please do not complete this evaluation unless you attended the program.

	5 Excellent	4 Good	3 Average	2 Poor	1 Very Poor	N/A
Overall quality of the program	Overall quality of the program 5 Excellent	Overall quality of the program 4 Good	Overall quality of the program 3 Average	Overall quality of the program 2 Poor	Overall quality of the program 1 Very Poor	Overall quality of the program N/A
Relevance of the program topic	Relevance of the program topic 5 Excellent	Relevance of the program topic 4 Good	Relevance of the program topic 3 Average	Relevance of the program topic 2 Poor	Relevance of the program topic 1 Very Poor	Relevance of the program topic N/A
Learning outcomes were defined and met	Learning outcomes were defined and met 5 Excellent	Learning outcomes were defined and met 4 Good	Learning outcomes were defined and met 3 Average	Learning outcomes were defined and met 2 Poor	Learning outcomes were defined and met 1 Very Poor	Learning outcomes were defined and met N/A
Quality of the presenters (knowledge of the subject, presenting abilities, etc.)	Quality of the presenters (knowledge of the subject, presenting abilities, etc.) 5 Excellent	Quality of the presenters (knowledge of the subject, presenting abilities, etc.) 4 Good	Quality of the presenters (knowledge of the subject, presenting abilities, etc.) 3 Average	Quality of the presenters (knowledge of the subject, presenting abilities, etc.) 2 Poor	Quality of the presenters (knowledge of the subject, presenting abilities, etc.) 1 Very Poor	Quality of the presenters (knowledge of the subject, presenting abilities, etc.) N/A
Pace of the session	Pace of the session 5 Excellent	Pace of the session 4 Good	Pace of the session 3 Average	Pace of the session 2 Poor	Pace of the session 1 Very Poor	Pace of the session N/A
Organization of the program (program flowed nicely, etc.)	Organization of the program (program flowed nicely, etc.) 5 Excellent	Organization of the program (program flowed nicely, etc.) 4 Good	Organization of the program (program flowed nicely, etc.) 3 Average	Organization of the program (program flowed nicely, etc.) 2 Poor	Organization of the program (program flowed nicely, etc.) 1 Very Poor	Organization of the program (program flowed nicely, etc.) N/A
Overall effectiveness of the program at a large conference like ALA	Overall effectiveness of the program at a large conference like ALA 5 Excellent	Overall effectiveness of the program at a large conference like ALA 4 Good	Overall effectiveness of the program at a large conference like ALA 3 Average	Overall effectiveness of the program at a large conference like ALA 2 Poor	Overall effectiveness of the program at a large conference like ALA 1 Very Poor	Overall effectiveness of the program at a large conference like ALA N/A
Quality of visual aids (if any)	Quality of visual aids (if any) 5 Excellent	Quality of visual aids (if any) 4 Good	Quality of visual aids (if any) 3 Average	Quality of visual aids (if any) 2 Poor	Quality of visual aids (if any) 1 Very Poor	Quality of visual aids (if any) N/A

5 Excellent

4 Good

3 Average

2 Poor

1 Very Poor

N/A

Overall quality of the program

Overall quality of the program 5 Excellent

Overall quality of the program 4 Good

Overall quality of the program 3 Average

Overall quality of the program 2 Poor

Overall quality of the program 1 Very Poor

Overall quality of the program N/A

Relevance of the program topic

Relevance of the program topic 5 Excellent

Relevance of the program topic 4 Good

Relevance of the program topic 3 Average

Relevance of the program topic 2 Poor

Relevance of the program topic 1 Very Poor

Relevance of the program topic N/A

Learning outcomes were defined and met

Learning outcomes were defined and met 5 Excellent

Learning outcomes were defined and met 4 Good

Learning outcomes were defined and met 3 Average

Learning outcomes were defined and met 2 Poor

Learning outcomes were defined and met 1 Very Poor

Learning outcomes were defined and met N/A

Quality of the presenters (knowledge of the subject, presenting abilities, etc.)

Quality of the presenters (knowledge of the subject, presenting abilities, etc.) 5 Excellent

Quality of the presenters (knowledge of the subject, presenting abilities, etc.) 4 Good

Quality of the presenters (knowledge of the subject, presenting abilities, etc.) 3 Average

Quality of the presenters (knowledge of the subject, presenting abilities, etc.) 2 Poor

Quality of the presenters (knowledge of the subject, presenting abilities, etc.) 1 Very Poor

Quality of the presenters (knowledge of the subject, presenting abilities, etc.) N/A

Pace of the session

Pace of the session 5 Excellent

Pace of the session 4 Good

Pace of the session 3 Average

Pace of the session 2 Poor

Pace of the session 1 Very Poor

Pace of the session N/A

Organization of the program (program flowed nicely, etc.)

Organization of the program (program flowed nicely, etc.) 5 Excellent

Organization of the program (program flowed nicely, etc.) 4 Good

Organization of the program (program flowed nicely, etc.) 3 Average

Organization of the program (program flowed nicely, etc.) 2 Poor

Organization of the program (program flowed nicely, etc.) 1 Very Poor

Organization of the program (program flowed nicely, etc.) N/A

Overall effectiveness of the program at a large conference like ALA

Overall effectiveness of the program at a large conference like ALA 5 Excellent

Overall effectiveness of the program at a large conference like ALA 4 Good

Overall effectiveness of the program at a large conference like ALA 3 Average

Overall effectiveness of the program at a large conference like ALA 2 Poor

Overall effectiveness of the program at a large conference like ALA 1 Very Poor

Overall effectiveness of the program at a large conference like ALA N/A

Quality of visual aids (if any)

Quality of visual aids (if any) 5 Excellent

Quality of visual aids (if any) 4 Good

Quality of visual aids (if any) 3 Average

Quality of visual aids (if any) 2 Poor

Quality of visual aids (if any) 1 Very Poor

Quality of visual aids (if any) N/A

AC13: Celebrating Poetry Fridays

AC13: Celebrating Poetry Fridays

Question Title

* 1. On a scale of one to five, one being poor and five being excellent, please rate the following aspects of the program. If you feel the question does not apply to the program please select “n/a.”

Question Title

* 2. What information from this program did you find most useful?

Question Title

* 3. What recommendations would you make to improve this session?

Question Title

* 4. Are you an ALSC member?

Question Title

* 5. Please list other educational program topics you would like to see ALSC offer: