Overall quality of the program
Overall quality of the program 5 Excellent
Overall quality of the program 4 Good
Overall quality of the program 3 Average
Overall quality of the program 2 Poor
Overall quality of the program 1 Very Poor
Overall quality of the program N/A
Relevance of the program topic
Relevance of the program topic 5 Excellent
Relevance of the program topic 4 Good
Relevance of the program topic 3 Average
Relevance of the program topic 2 Poor
Relevance of the program topic 1 Very Poor
Relevance of the program topic N/A
Learning outcomes were defined and met
Learning outcomes were defined and met 5 Excellent
Learning outcomes were defined and met 4 Good
Learning outcomes were defined and met 3 Average
Learning outcomes were defined and met 2 Poor
Learning outcomes were defined and met 1 Very Poor
Learning outcomes were defined and met N/A
Quality of the presenters (knowledge of the subject, presenting abilities, etc.)
Quality of the presenters (knowledge of the subject, presenting abilities, etc.) 5 Excellent
Quality of the presenters (knowledge of the subject, presenting abilities, etc.) 4 Good
Quality of the presenters (knowledge of the subject, presenting abilities, etc.) 3 Average
Quality of the presenters (knowledge of the subject, presenting abilities, etc.) 2 Poor
Quality of the presenters (knowledge of the subject, presenting abilities, etc.) 1 Very Poor
Quality of the presenters (knowledge of the subject, presenting abilities, etc.) N/A
Pace of the session
Pace of the session 5 Excellent
Pace of the session 4 Good
Pace of the session 3 Average
Pace of the session 2 Poor
Pace of the session 1 Very Poor
Pace of the session N/A
Organization of the program (program flowed nicely, etc.)
Organization of the program (program flowed nicely, etc.) 5 Excellent
Organization of the program (program flowed nicely, etc.) 4 Good
Organization of the program (program flowed nicely, etc.) 3 Average
Organization of the program (program flowed nicely, etc.) 2 Poor
Organization of the program (program flowed nicely, etc.) 1 Very Poor
Organization of the program (program flowed nicely, etc.) N/A
Overall effectiveness of the program at a large conference like ALA
Overall effectiveness of the program at a large conference like ALA 5 Excellent
Overall effectiveness of the program at a large conference like ALA 4 Good
Overall effectiveness of the program at a large conference like ALA 3 Average
Overall effectiveness of the program at a large conference like ALA 2 Poor
Overall effectiveness of the program at a large conference like ALA 1 Very Poor
Overall effectiveness of the program at a large conference like ALA N/A
Quality of visual aids (if any)
Quality of visual aids (if any) 5 Excellent
Quality of visual aids (if any) 4 Good
Quality of visual aids (if any) 3 Average
Quality of visual aids (if any) 2 Poor
Quality of visual aids (if any) 1 Very Poor
Quality of visual aids (if any) N/A