Industry Seminar Survey: Plant Pests and Diseases

Presenter Information & Speaker Evaluation

33% of survey complete.

Question Title

* 1. Please evaluate each speaker. (speakers listed alphabetically)

	Excellent	Good	Average	Fair	Poor
Bart Haycraft, Jackson Family Estates, California	Bart Haycraft, Jackson Family Estates, California Excellent	Bart Haycraft, Jackson Family Estates, California Good	Bart Haycraft, Jackson Family Estates, California Average	Bart Haycraft, Jackson Family Estates, California Fair	Bart Haycraft, Jackson Family Estates, California Poor
Eric Lauritzen, Agricultural Commissioner, Monterey County	Eric Lauritzen, Agricultural Commissioner, Monterey County Excellent	Eric Lauritzen, Agricultural Commissioner, Monterey County Good	Eric Lauritzen, Agricultural Commissioner, Monterey County Average	Eric Lauritzen, Agricultural Commissioner, Monterey County Fair	Eric Lauritzen, Agricultural Commissioner, Monterey County Poor
Rhonda Smith, University of California Cooperative Extension, Sonoma County (Chair)	Rhonda Smith, University of California Cooperative Extension, Sonoma County (Chair) Excellent	Rhonda Smith, University of California Cooperative Extension, Sonoma County (Chair) Good	Rhonda Smith, University of California Cooperative Extension, Sonoma County (Chair) Average	Rhonda Smith, University of California Cooperative Extension, Sonoma County (Chair) Fair	Rhonda Smith, University of California Cooperative Extension, Sonoma County (Chair) Poor

Question Title

* 2. Comments On Specific Speaker(s):
Please include speaker name(s).

Question Title

* 3. Please rate the following information.

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree	N/A
Presenters were well prepared and organized.	Presenters were well prepared and organized. Strongly Agree	Presenters were well prepared and organized. Agree	Presenters were well prepared and organized. Neutral	Presenters were well prepared and organized. Disagree	Presenters were well prepared and organized. Strongly Disagree	Presenters were well prepared and organized. N/A
Presenters were knowledgeable about subject matter.	Presenters were knowledgeable about subject matter. Strongly Agree	Presenters were knowledgeable about subject matter. Agree	Presenters were knowledgeable about subject matter. Neutral	Presenters were knowledgeable about subject matter. Disagree	Presenters were knowledgeable about subject matter. Strongly Disagree	Presenters were knowledgeable about subject matter. N/A
Presenters’ style was clear and effective.	Presenters’ style was clear and effective. Strongly Agree	Presenters’ style was clear and effective. Agree	Presenters’ style was clear and effective. Neutral	Presenters’ style was clear and effective. Disagree	Presenters’ style was clear and effective. Strongly Disagree	Presenters’ style was clear and effective. N/A
Presenters stimulated interest and discussion.	Presenters stimulated interest and discussion. Strongly Agree	Presenters stimulated interest and discussion. Agree	Presenters stimulated interest and discussion. Neutral	Presenters stimulated interest and discussion. Disagree	Presenters stimulated interest and discussion. Strongly Disagree	Presenters stimulated interest and discussion. N/A
Presenters were responsive to participants.	Presenters were responsive to participants. Strongly Agree	Presenters were responsive to participants. Agree	Presenters were responsive to participants. Neutral	Presenters were responsive to participants. Disagree	Presenters were responsive to participants. Strongly Disagree	Presenters were responsive to participants. N/A
Visual aids were useful and appropriate.	Visual aids were useful and appropriate. Strongly Agree	Visual aids were useful and appropriate. Agree	Visual aids were useful and appropriate. Neutral	Visual aids were useful and appropriate. Disagree	Visual aids were useful and appropriate. Strongly Disagree	Visual aids were useful and appropriate. N/A
The content was consistent with the description.	The content was consistent with the description. Strongly Agree	The content was consistent with the description. Agree	The content was consistent with the description. Neutral	The content was consistent with the description. Disagree	The content was consistent with the description. Strongly Disagree	The content was consistent with the description. N/A
Objectives were clearly stated.	Objectives were clearly stated. Strongly Agree	Objectives were clearly stated. Agree	Objectives were clearly stated. Neutral	Objectives were clearly stated. Disagree	Objectives were clearly stated. Strongly Disagree	Objectives were clearly stated. N/A
There was a balance of theory and practice presented.	There was a balance of theory and practice presented. Strongly Agree	There was a balance of theory and practice presented. Agree	There was a balance of theory and practice presented. Neutral	There was a balance of theory and practice presented. Disagree	There was a balance of theory and practice presented. Strongly Disagree	There was a balance of theory and practice presented. N/A
Information was timely and relevant.	Information was timely and relevant. Strongly Agree	Information was timely and relevant. Agree	Information was timely and relevant. Neutral	Information was timely and relevant. Disagree	Information was timely and relevant. Strongly Disagree	Information was timely and relevant. N/A