Portneuf third class
Exit this survey
1. Default Section
1
. Please rate how much you agree with the following aspects of the WATER, WETLANDS, ECOSYSTEMS 101 (Colden Baxter) portion of this week's session.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neither Disagree nor Agree
Agree
Strongly Agree
Speaker was well organized.
*
Please rate how much you agree with the following aspects of the WATER, WETLANDS, ECOSYSTEMS 101 (Colden Baxter) portion of this week's session. Speaker was well organized. Strongly Disagree
Speaker was well organized. Disagree
Speaker was well organized. Neither Disagree nor Agree
Speaker was well organized. Agree
Speaker was well organized. Strongly Agree
Speaker was knowledgable.
Speaker was knowledgable. Strongly Disagree
Speaker was knowledgable. Disagree
Speaker was knowledgable. Neither Disagree nor Agree
Speaker was knowledgable. Agree
Speaker was knowledgable. Strongly Agree
The material was presented at an appropriate depth.
The material was presented at an appropriate depth. Strongly Disagree
The material was presented at an appropriate depth. Disagree
The material was presented at an appropriate depth. Neither Disagree nor Agree
The material was presented at an appropriate depth. Agree
The material was presented at an appropriate depth. Strongly Agree
The presentation was interesting.
The presentation was interesting. Strongly Disagree
The presentation was interesting. Disagree
The presentation was interesting. Neither Disagree nor Agree
The presentation was interesting. Agree
The presentation was interesting. Strongly Agree
I would suggest having this speaker again for next year.
I would suggest having this speaker again for next year. Strongly Disagree
I would suggest having this speaker again for next year. Disagree
I would suggest having this speaker again for next year. Neither Disagree nor Agree
I would suggest having this speaker again for next year. Agree
I would suggest having this speaker again for next year. Strongly Agree
2
. Please rate how much you agree with the following aspects of the PORTNEUF RIVER AND THE CITY OF POCATELLO CONCERNS (Hanna Sanger) portion of the presentation.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neither Disagree nor Agree
Agree
Strongly Agree
Speaker was well organized.
*
Please rate how much you agree with the following aspects of the PORTNEUF RIVER AND THE CITY OF POCATELLO CONCERNS (Hanna Sanger) portion of the presentation. Speaker was well organized. Strongly Disagree
Speaker was well organized. Disagree
Speaker was well organized. Neither Disagree nor Agree
Speaker was well organized. Agree
Speaker was well organized. Strongly Agree
Speaker was knowledgable.
Speaker was knowledgable. Strongly Disagree
Speaker was knowledgable. Disagree
Speaker was knowledgable. Neither Disagree nor Agree
Speaker was knowledgable. Agree
Speaker was knowledgable. Strongly Agree
The material was presented at an appropriate depth.
The material was presented at an appropriate depth. Strongly Disagree
The material was presented at an appropriate depth. Disagree
The material was presented at an appropriate depth. Neither Disagree nor Agree
The material was presented at an appropriate depth. Agree
The material was presented at an appropriate depth. Strongly Agree
The presentation was interesting.
The presentation was interesting. Strongly Disagree
The presentation was interesting. Disagree
The presentation was interesting. Neither Disagree nor Agree
The presentation was interesting. Agree
The presentation was interesting. Strongly Agree
I would suggest having this speaker again for next year.
I would suggest having this speaker again for next year. Strongly Disagree
I would suggest having this speaker again for next year. Disagree
I would suggest having this speaker again for next year. Neither Disagree nor Agree
I would suggest having this speaker again for next year. Agree
I would suggest having this speaker again for next year. Strongly Agree
3
. Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statement about the FIELD TRIP CHERRY SPRINGS and AQUATIC INVERTEBRATE portion of this week's session.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neither Disagree nor Agree
Agree
Stronly Agree
I enjoyed this field trip and would recommend doing it next year.
*
Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statement about the FIELD TRIP CHERRY SPRINGS and AQUATIC INVERTEBRATE portion of this week's session. I enjoyed this field trip and would recommend doing it next year. Strongly Disagree
I enjoyed this field trip and would recommend doing it next year. Disagree
I enjoyed this field trip and would recommend doing it next year. Neither Disagree nor Agree
I enjoyed this field trip and would recommend doing it next year. Agree
I enjoyed this field trip and would recommend doing it next year. Stronly Agree
I enjoyed learning about electro fishing and aquatic invertebrates.
I enjoyed learning about electro fishing and aquatic invertebrates. Strongly Disagree
I enjoyed learning about electro fishing and aquatic invertebrates. Disagree
I enjoyed learning about electro fishing and aquatic invertebrates. Neither Disagree nor Agree
I enjoyed learning about electro fishing and aquatic invertebrates. Agree
I enjoyed learning about electro fishing and aquatic invertebrates. Stronly Agree
4
. Please rate how much you agree with the following aspects of the ARCHEOLOGY (Rick Holmer) portion of this week's session.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neither Disagree nor Agree
Agree
Strongly Agree
Speaker was well organized.
*
Please rate how much you agree with the following aspects of the ARCHEOLOGY (Rick Holmer) portion of this week's session. Speaker was well organized. Strongly Disagree
Speaker was well organized. Disagree
Speaker was well organized. Neither Disagree nor Agree
Speaker was well organized. Agree
Speaker was well organized. Strongly Agree
Speaker was knowledgable.
Speaker was knowledgable. Strongly Disagree
Speaker was knowledgable. Disagree
Speaker was knowledgable. Neither Disagree nor Agree
Speaker was knowledgable. Agree
Speaker was knowledgable. Strongly Agree
The material was presented at an appropriate depth.
The material was presented at an appropriate depth. Strongly Disagree
The material was presented at an appropriate depth. Disagree
The material was presented at an appropriate depth. Neither Disagree nor Agree
The material was presented at an appropriate depth. Agree
The material was presented at an appropriate depth. Strongly Agree
The presentation was interesting.
The presentation was interesting. Strongly Disagree
The presentation was interesting. Disagree
The presentation was interesting. Neither Disagree nor Agree
The presentation was interesting. Agree
The presentation was interesting. Strongly Agree
I would suggest having this speaker again for next year.
I would suggest having this speaker again for next year. Strongly Disagree
I would suggest having this speaker again for next year. Disagree
I would suggest having this speaker again for next year. Neither Disagree nor Agree
I would suggest having this speaker again for next year. Agree
I would suggest having this speaker again for next year. Strongly Agree
5
. Please rate how much you agree with the following aspects of the EDSON FICHTER portion of the session.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neither Disagree nor Agree
Agree
Strongly Agree
Speaker was well organized.
*
Please rate how much you agree with the following aspects of the EDSON FICHTER portion of the session. Speaker was well organized. Strongly Disagree
Speaker was well organized. Disagree
Speaker was well organized. Neither Disagree nor Agree
Speaker was well organized. Agree
Speaker was well organized. Strongly Agree
Speaker was knowledgable.
Speaker was knowledgable. Strongly Disagree
Speaker was knowledgable. Disagree
Speaker was knowledgable. Neither Disagree nor Agree
Speaker was knowledgable. Agree
Speaker was knowledgable. Strongly Agree
The material was presented at an appropriate depth.
The material was presented at an appropriate depth. Strongly Disagree
The material was presented at an appropriate depth. Disagree
The material was presented at an appropriate depth. Neither Disagree nor Agree
The material was presented at an appropriate depth. Agree
The material was presented at an appropriate depth. Strongly Agree
The presentation was interesting.
The presentation was interesting. Strongly Disagree
The presentation was interesting. Disagree
The presentation was interesting. Neither Disagree nor Agree
The presentation was interesting. Agree
The presentation was interesting. Strongly Agree
I would suggest having this speaker again for next year.
I would suggest having this speaker again for next year. Strongly Disagree
I would suggest having this speaker again for next year. Disagree
I would suggest having this speaker again for next year. Neither Disagree nor Agree
I would suggest having this speaker again for next year. Agree
I would suggest having this speaker again for next year. Strongly Agree
6
. Please take time write what you liked best about this week's session.
Please take time write what you liked best about this week's session.
7
. Please tell us how you think we could improve this session in the future.
Please tell us how you think we could improve this session in the future.
Javascript is required for this site to function, please enable.