SCEE Summit Evaluation 2012

Thank you for taking part in CCSSO’s State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness (SCEE) National Summit in Seattle, WA. Please take a few minutes to complete this short survey. Your feedback is critical to us when designing future meetings.

If you have any questions or difficulties with this survey, please contact William Bentgen at williamb@ccsso.org

Please rate the following:

	N/A or Unknown	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree
The state team time helped our state develop or refine our Theory of Action.	*Please rate the following: The state team time helped our state develop or refine our Theory of Action. N/A or Unknown	The state team time helped our state develop or refine our Theory of Action. Strongly Disagree	The state team time helped our state develop or refine our Theory of Action. Disagree	The state team time helped our state develop or refine our Theory of Action. Agree	The state team time helped our state develop or refine our Theory of Action. Strongly Agree
Educator preparation is an essential part of our state’s educator effectiveness system.	Educator preparation is an essential part of our state’s educator effectiveness system. N/A or Unknown	Educator preparation is an essential part of our state’s educator effectiveness system. Strongly Disagree	Educator preparation is an essential part of our state’s educator effectiveness system. Disagree	Educator preparation is an essential part of our state’s educator effectiveness system. Agree	Educator preparation is an essential part of our state’s educator effectiveness system. Strongly Agree
We can use the available levers (program approval, initial certification/licensure, data reporting) to states to transform educator preparation in our state.	We can use the available levers (program approval, initial certification/licensure, data reporting) to states to transform educator preparation in our state. N/A or Unknown	We can use the available levers (program approval, initial certification/licensure, data reporting) to states to transform educator preparation in our state. Strongly Disagree	We can use the available levers (program approval, initial certification/licensure, data reporting) to states to transform educator preparation in our state. Disagree	We can use the available levers (program approval, initial certification/licensure, data reporting) to states to transform educator preparation in our state. Agree	We can use the available levers (program approval, initial certification/licensure, data reporting) to states to transform educator preparation in our state. Strongly Agree
Defining “classroom readiness” and “leadership readiness” is a good way to communicate our needs to preparation programs.	Defining “classroom readiness” and “leadership readiness” is a good way to communicate our needs to preparation programs. N/A or Unknown	Defining “classroom readiness” and “leadership readiness” is a good way to communicate our needs to preparation programs. Strongly Disagree	Defining “classroom readiness” and “leadership readiness” is a good way to communicate our needs to preparation programs. Disagree	Defining “classroom readiness” and “leadership readiness” is a good way to communicate our needs to preparation programs. Agree	Defining “classroom readiness” and “leadership readiness” is a good way to communicate our needs to preparation programs. Strongly Agree

Did the conference fulfill your reason for attending?

Did the conference fulfill your reason for attending? Yes—absolutely

Yes—but not to my full extent

Please elaborate on your answer:

Do you plan to attend this summit again next year?

Do you plan to attend this summit again next year? Yes

Don’t Know

Please elaborate on your answer:

Would you recommend this summit to others?

Would you recommend this summit to others? Yes

Don’t Know

Please elaborate on your answer:

How would you rate this conference compared to other summits/conferences of this type that you have attended?

How would you rate this conference compared to other summits/conferences of this type that you have attended? Excellent

Very Good

Average

Poor

Very Poor

In what ways could this summit be improved?

Please answer the following:

	Very satisfied	Satisfied	Dissatisfied	Very Dissatisfied
Summit staff was helpful and courteous.	*Please answer the following: Summit staff was helpful and courteous. Very satisfied	Summit staff was helpful and courteous. Satisfied	Summit staff was helpful and courteous. Dissatisfied	Summit staff was helpful and courteous. Very Dissatisfied
The summit was well organized.	The summit was well organized. Very satisfied	The summit was well organized. Satisfied	The summit was well organized. Dissatisfied	The summit was well organized. Very Dissatisfied
Overall, how satisfied were you with the summit speakers/presenters?	Overall, how satisfied were you with the summit speakers/presenters? Very satisfied	Overall, how satisfied were you with the summit speakers/presenters? Satisfied	Overall, how satisfied were you with the summit speakers/presenters? Dissatisfied	Overall, how satisfied were you with the summit speakers/presenters? Very Dissatisfied
Overall, how satisfied were you with the conference facilities?	Overall, how satisfied were you with the conference facilities? Very satisfied	Overall, how satisfied were you with the conference facilities? Satisfied	Overall, how satisfied were you with the conference facilities? Dissatisfied	Overall, how satisfied were you with the conference facilities? Very Dissatisfied

Comments:

What topics would you like to see webinars on in the future? Check all that apply.

What topics would you like to see webinars on in the future? Check all that apply. Non-tested grades and subjects

Communications

InTASC learning progressions for teachers

Legal implications for high stakes evaluation systems

Training for evaluators

Transforming educator preparation

Rulemaking on Title II and IV of the Higher Education Act

Implementation plans for Principle 3 of the Waiver Applications

Career continuums or ladders, tiered licensure/certification, shared leadership

The pros and cons of tying evaluation and licensure/certification together

Tenure v. performance : What does the future look like?

Compensation systems

Restructuring the school day to allow for professional learning

The role of the principal in the rapidly changing reform environment

Other:

What other services would you like to see CCSSO offer to SCEE states?

Should we allow independent professional standards boards to have a stand-alone membership in SCEE if the SEA doesn’t include representatives on their SCEE team?

Should we allow independent professional standards boards to have a stand-alone membership in SCEE if the SEA doesn’t include representatives on their SCEE team? Yes

If so why? (Yes or No)

Is there anything that we need to change for the rest of the Summit? If so, please describe briefly.

SCEE Summit Evaluation 2012 - Day 3

1. SCEE Summit 2012 - Day 3 Evaluation