TICP YEAR 4 2009-2010 Candidate Evaluation of Instructor

Exit this survey

 

1. Please identify yourself:

Please identify yourself:   Linda Attoe Colleen Flood Katherine Harper John Iddiols Chris McIntosh Hilary Offman David Robertson

2. Please indicate which TICP Year 4 2009 - 2010 Course you are evaluating:

Please indicate which TICP Year 4 2009 - 2010 Course you are evaluating:   September 14 - Oct 19 ,2009: Neo-Kleinian Thought / Cont Case 1.1 October 5, 2009: Neo-Kleinian Thought / Cont Case 1.3 October 19, 2009: Neo-Kleinian Thought / Cont Case 1.4 October 26, 2009: Freudian and French Ucs / Cont Case 2.1 November 2, 2009: Freudian and Frenc Ucs / Cont Case 2.2 November 9, 2009: Kleinian Ucs / Cont Case 2.3 November 16, 2009: Self Psych Ucs / Cont Case 2.4 November 23, 2009: Relational Ucs / Cont Case 2.5 November 30, 2009: Procedural Ucs / Cont Case 3.1 December 7, 2009: Aggression / Cont Case 3.2 December 14, 2009: Aggression / Cont Case 3.3

Remarks

3. Please indicate which TICP Instructor you are evaluating:

Please indicate which TICP Instructor you are evaluating:   Dr. Brent Willock Dr. Bruce Herzog Dr. Donald Carveth Dr. Gail White Dr. Gary Taerk Dr. Judith Levene Dr. Marsha Hewitt Dr. Rex Kay Dr. Ron Ruskin

Remarks

4. Please evaluate the seminar / instructor you have indicated above by using the following rating system:

	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent
Usefulness of clinical material	*Please evaluate the seminar / instructor you have indicated above by using the following rating system: Usefulness of clinical material Poor	Usefulness of clinical material Fair	Usefulness of clinical material Good	Usefulness of clinical material Excellent
Clinical applications of material	Clinical applications of material Poor	Clinical applications of material Fair	Clinical applications of material Good	Clinical applications of material Excellent
Usefulness of discussion	Usefulness of discussion Poor	Usefulness of discussion Fair	Usefulness of discussion Good	Usefulness of discussion Excellent
Encouragement / facilitation of candidate participation	Encouragement / facilitation of candidate participation Poor	Encouragement / facilitation of candidate participation Fair	Encouragement / facilitation of candidate participation Good	Encouragement / facilitation of candidate participation Excellent
Comparative / Integrative Focus	Comparative / Integrative Focus Poor	Comparative / Integrative Focus Fair	Comparative / Integrative Focus Good	Comparative / Integrative Focus Excellent
Readings	Readings Poor	Readings Fair	Readings Good	Readings Excellent
Organzation	Organzation Poor	Organzation Fair	Organzation Good	Organzation Excellent
Clarity	Clarity Poor	Clarity Fair	Clarity Good	Clarity Excellent

Remarks

Thank you for your participation!