6th CCD Day 2

FRIDAY, OCTOBER 28, 2011

 
 100% 
1. How would you rate the session, AD Therapy in the Future: What are the Best Bets and Dark Horses by Dr. Howard Feldman? Please select the applicable number.
1 - Strongly Disagree2 - Disagree3 - Neutral4 - Agree5 - Strongly Agree
Was consistent with learning objectives
Information was relevant and useful to my practice
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention
Did you feel there were any commercial interests that influenced the presentation
2. How would you rate the session, Imaging and Biological Biomarkers by Dr. Clifford Jack? Please select the applicable number.
1 - Strongly Disagree2 - Disagree3 - Neutral4 - Agree5 - Strongly Agree
Was consistent with learning objectives
Information was relevant and useful to my practice
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention
Did you feel there were any commercial interests that influenced the presentation
3. How would you rate the session, Neuropsychological Markers of Dementia by Dr. Mary Tierney? Please select the applicable number.
1 - Strongly Disagree2 - Disagree3 - Neutral4 - Agree5 - Strongly Agree
Was consistent with learning objectives
Information was relevant and useful to my practice
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention
Did you feel there were any commercial interests that influenced the presentation
PARALLEL SESSION 1 - DEMENTIA UPDATE (Please only evaluate the sessions you have attended)
4. How would you rate the session, Frontotemporal Dementia: A Heterogeneous Disease with Heterogeneous Pathology by Dr. Maria Carmela Tartaglia? Please select the applicable number.
1 - Strongly Disagree2 - Disagree3 - Neutral4 - Agree5 - Strongly Agree
Was consistent with learning objectives
Information was relevant and useful to my practice
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention
Did you feel there were any commercial interests that influenced the presentation
5. How would you rate the session, Update on Vascular Cognitive Impairment by Dr. Eric Smith? Please select the applicable number.
1 - Strongly Disagree2 - Disagree3 - Neutral4 - Agree5 - Strongly Agree
Was consistent with learning objectives
Information was relevant and useful to my practice
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention
Did you feel there were any commercial interests that influenced the presentation
6. How would you rate the session, An Update on Lewy Body Spectrum Disorders by Dr. Mario Masellis? Please select the applicable number.
1 - Strongly Disagree2 - Disagree3 - Neutral4 - Agree5 - Strongly Agree
Was consistent with learning objectives
Information was relevant and useful to my practice
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention
Did you feel there were any commercial interests that influenced the presentation
PARALLEL SESSION 2 - NEUROIMAGING (Please only evaluate the sessions you have attended)
7. How would you rate the session, Black and White Spots: The Saga of Brain Aging, Alzheimer's & Small Black Vessel Disease by Dr. Sandra Black? Please select the applicable number.
1 - Strongly Disagree2 - Disagree3 - Neutral4 - Agree5 - Strongly Agree
Was consistent with learning objectives
Information was relevant and useful to my practice
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention
Did you feel there were any commercial interests that influenced the presentation
8. How would you rate the session, Functional Neuroimaging by Dr. Clifford Jack? Please select the applicable number.
1 - Strongly Disagree2 - Disagree3 - Neutral4 - Agree5 - Strongly Agree
Was consistent with learning objectives
Information was relevant and useful to my practice
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention
Did you feel there were any commercial interests that influenced the presentation
9. How would you rate the session, Amyloid Safety Monitoring by Dr. Reisa Sperling? Please select the applicable number.
1 - Strongly Disagree2 - Disagree3 - Neutral4 - Agree5 - Strongly Agree
Was consistent with learning objectives
Information was relevant and useful to my practice
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention
Did you feel there were any commercial interests that influenced the presentation
PARALLEL SESSION 3 - CLINICAL CARE (Please only evaluate the sessions you have attended)
10. How would you rate the session, Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Dementia by Dr. Dallas Seitz? Please select the applicable number.
1 - Strongly Disagree2 - Disagree3 - Neutral4 - Agree5 - Strongly Agree
Was consistent with learning objectives
Information was relevant and useful to my practice
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention
Did you feel there were any commercial interests that influenced the presentation
11. How would you rate the session, PATH: A New Model for Decision Making in Dementia & Frailty by Dr. Paige Moorehouse? Please select the applicable number.
1 - Strongly Disagree2 - Disagree3 - Neutral4 - Agree5 - Strongly Agree
Was consistent with learning objectives
Information was relevant and useful to my practice
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention
Did you feel there were any commercial interests that influenced the presentation
12. How would you rate the session, Clinical Course of Advanced Dementia: Complications, Interventions, & Decision-Making by Dr. Susan Mitchell? Please select the applicable number.
1 - Strongly Disagree2 - Disagree3 - Neutral4 - Agree5 - Strongly Agree
Was consistent with learning objectives
Information was relevant and useful to my practice
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention
Did you feel there were any commercial interests that influenced the presentation
PARALLEL SESSION 4 - BASIC SCIENCES OR THERAPEUTICS (Please only evaluate the sessions you have attended)
13. How would you rate the session, Oxidative Stress by Dr. Hymann Schipper? Please select the applicable number.
1 - Strongly Disagree2 - Disagree3 - Neutral4 - Agree5 - Strongly Agree
Was consistent with learning objectives
Information was relevant and useful to my practice
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention
Did you feel there were any commercial interests that influenced the presentation
14. How would you rate the session, Targeting Tau in Tauopathies by Dr. Maria Carmela Tartaglia? Please select the applicable number.
1 - Strongly Disagree2 - Disagree3 - Neutral4 - Agree5 - Strongly Agree
Was consistent with learning objectives
Information was relevant and useful to my practice
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention
Did you feel there were any commercial interests that influenced the presentation
15. How would you rate the session, Imaging the Effects of Beta-Amyloid in Normal Aging by Dr. William Jagust? Please select the applicable number.
1 - Strongly Disagree2 - Disagree3 - Neutral4 - Agree5 - Strongly Agree
Was consistent with learning objectives
Information was relevant and useful to my practice
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention
Did you feel there were any commercial interests that influenced the presentation
`````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
16. How would you rate the session, New Diagnostic Criteria for Mild Cognitive Impairment by Dr. William Jagust? Please select the applicable number.
1 - Strongly Disagree2 - Disagree3 - Neutral4 - Agree5 - Strongly Agree
Was consistent with learning objectives
Information was relevant and useful to my practice
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention
Did you feel there were any commercial interests that influenced the presentation
17. How would you rate the session, Alzheimer's Disease by Dr. Howard Chertkow? Please select the applicable number.
1 - Strongly Disagree2 - Disagree3 - Neutral4 - Agree5 - Strongly Agree
Was consistent with learning objectives
Information was relevant and useful to my practice
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention
Did you feel there were any commercial interests that influenced the presentation
18. How would you rate the session, Pre-Clinical Alzheimer's Disease by Dr. Reisa Sperling? Please select the applicable number.
1 - Strongly Disagree2 - Disagree3 - Neutral4 - Agree5 - Strongly Agree
Was consistent with learning objectives
Information was relevant and useful to my practice
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention
Did you feel there were any commercial interests that influenced the presentation
19. How would you rate the Panel Discussion? Please select the applicable number.
1 - Strongly Disagree2 - Disagree3 - Neutral4 - Agree5 - Strongly Agree
Was consistent with learning objectives
Information was relevant and useful to my practice
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Dr. Serge Gauthier (Moderator)
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Dr. William Jagust
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Dr. Howard Cherktow
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Dr. Reisa Sperling
Did you feel there were any commercial interests that influenced the presentation
Powered by SurveyMonkey
Check out our sample surveys and create your own now!