MI 720 Team Project Peer Review Survey

As noted earlier, you are required to read and review at least six Team Wiki projects. You must review the two teams right above you numerically (in the same section) and four other projects of your choice. Note, you will fill out a separate survey for each team project you review, meaning you will have to return to this survey link six times.

*
1. My name (last, first) is:

My name (last, first) is:

*
2. The Team I am on is:

The Team I am on is: Team 1

Team 2

Team 3

Team 4

Team 5

Team 6

Team 7

Team 8

Team 9

Team 10

Team 11

Team 12

Team 13

Team 14

Team 15

Team 16

Team 17

Team 18

Team 19

Team 20

*
3. The Wiki page project team I am peer reviewing is:

The Wiki page project team I am peer reviewing is: Team 1

Team 2

Team 3

Team 4

Team 5

Team 6

Team 7

Team 8

Team 9

Team 10

Team 11

Team 12

Team 13

Team 14

Team 15

Team 16

Team 17

Team 18

Team 19

Team 20

*
4. PROJECT TOPIC and SCOPE: The team picked an interesting topic and did a great job of drawing a coherent boundary on the SCOPE of their topic, neither too broad nor too narrow. Also, they picked a good subset area to focus on, i.e., a subset of the topic that is interesting, and important for MBAs and management to understand

PROJECT TOPIC and SCOPE: The team picked an interesting topic and did a great job of drawing a coherent boundary on the SCOPE of their topic, neither too broad nor too narrow. Also, they picked a good subset area to focus on, i.e., a subset of the topic that is interesting, and important for MBAs and management to understand 7-Very strongly agree (the SCOPE was perfectly drawn)

6-Strongly agree

5-Somewhat agree

4-Neutral

3-Somewhat disagree

2-Strongly disagree

1-Very strongly disagree (the SCOPE was badly drawn)

*
5. PAGE CONTENT: For a "typical" Boston College MBA, this wiki page provides a highly worthwhile learning opportunity on the topic in question. The content is accurate, convincing, and includes a fair amount of the team's own novel analysis and conclusions on the topic. The page provides significant value added compared to other readily available sources of information on this topic. The page has high quality links to related content for further study.

PAGE CONTENT: For a "typical" Boston College MBA, this wiki page provides a highly worthwhile learning opportunity on the topic in question. The content is accurate, convincing, and includes a fair amount of the team's own novel analysis and conclusions on the topic. The page provides significant value added compared to other readily available sources of information on this topic. The page has high quality links to related content for further study. 7-Very strongly agree (the CONTENT is simply outstanding)

6-Strongly agree

5-Somewhat agree

4-Neutral

3-Somewhat disagree

2-Strongly disagree

1-Very strongly disagree (the CONTENT is poor)

*
6. STYLE & STRUCTURE: The wiki page made it easy and fun to learn about the topic in an efficient manner. The page was well organized and a pleasure to read, with very concise and engaging text. The page was attractive and nicely formatted with "extras" (graphics, pictures, tables, embedded videos, etc.) that added significantly to the learning process.

STYLE & STRUCTURE: The wiki page made it easy and fun to learn about the topic in an efficient manner. The page was well organized and a pleasure to read, with very concise and engaging text. The page was attractive and nicely formatted with "extras" (graphics, pictures, tables, embedded videos, etc.) that added significantly to the learning process. 7-Very strongly agree (the STYLE/STRUCTURE is simply outstanding)

6-Strongly agree

5-Somewhat agree

4-Neutral

3-Somewhat disagree

2-Strongly disagree

1-Very strongly disagree (the STYLE/STRUCTURE is poor)

*
7. COMMENTS: Please provide some brief, constructive comments about your particular likes or dislikes about the wiki page, i.e., what worked well or not so well. Note, I may share some of these with the team (anonymously of course).

COMMENTS: Please provide some brief, constructive comments about your particular likes or dislikes about the wiki page, i.e., what worked well or not so well. Note, I may share some of these with the team (anonymously of course).

Thank you for your peer review!

Please remember to hit the "Done" button below to submit your review.

MI 720 Team Project Peer Review
Exit this survey

1. Team Wiki Project Peer Review

*
1. My name (last, first) is:

*
2. The Team I am on is:

*
3. The Wiki page project team I am peer reviewing is:

*
7. COMMENTS: Please provide some brief, constructive comments about your particular likes or dislikes about the wiki page, i.e., what worked well or not so well. Note, I may share some of these with the team (anonymously of course).

MI 720 Team Project Peer ReviewExit this survey

1. Team Wiki Project Peer Review

*1. My name (last, first) is:

*2. The Team I am on is:

*3. The Wiki page project team I am peer reviewing is:

*7. COMMENTS: Please provide some brief, constructive comments about your particular likes or dislikes about the wiki page, i.e., what worked well or not so well. Note, I may share some of these with the team (anonymously of course).

MI 720 Team Project Peer Review
Exit this survey

*
1. My name (last, first) is:

*
2. The Team I am on is:

*
3. The Wiki page project team I am peer reviewing is:

*
7. COMMENTS: Please provide some brief, constructive comments about your particular likes or dislikes about the wiki page, i.e., what worked well or not so well. Note, I may share some of these with the team (anonymously of course).