MIPSA Survey 1

1. Default Section

 
1. Welcome to the survey for our first virtual meeting. Please answer all questions on which you have opinions; your responses will not be individually reported except for any narrative comments that you might provide. We do ask for your name and email address, as we will put you on the MIPSA Listserv if you are not already on that (unless you indicate that you do not want to be on the listserv). We also encourage you to formally join the Task Force through your online ABA account.
2. Should the MIPSA grant clause say that, in addition to the grant of a security interest, the grant...
YesNoUndecided
is "irrevocable"?
is "continuing"?
includes an "assignment" of the Collateral?
includes a grant of a "lien" in the Collateral?
is made with "power of sale"?
includes a "right of setoff" against the Collateral?
"mortgages" the Collateral?
"hypothecates" the Collateral?
"assigns" the Collateral?
"pledges" the Collateral?
3. 29% of IPSAs sampled included express carveouts for "intentions to use" trademarks. If this is necessary to prevent harm to the ITU, then it should be in all security agreements that cover IP, even if just covered as "general intangibles." So this is a big question. The Task Force needs help evaluating this. Perhaps you already know the answer. Would you like to help with this issue?
4. Should the MIPSA grant clause include an express carveout for contravention of statutes generally?
5. Should the MIPSA grant clause include an express carveout for contravention of other contracts generally?
6. Would you like to talk with a Chair or Vice Chair of the MIPSA Task Force about joining the group, to offer to participate, or to lodge further comments on the above issues?
7. Please give below any brief additional comments on MIPSA matters
Powered by SurveyMonkey
Check out our sample surveys and create your own now!