IFLADIAL (IFLA Dialogue and Communications) Survey

On Saturday, August 11, at the very start of the IFLA World Library and Information Congress 2012 in Helsinki, all Section officers - including Special Interest Groups' Conveners - were invited to the Leadership Brief arranged by the Professional Committee (PC). There was a great interest in this meeting - the room was full at 8AM.

The formal agenda had four information items; the final point was devoted to "questions and discussion". Many of the participants clearly wanted a more participatory meeting, and said so during the debate. Debates and decisions ought to be more transparent to newcomers and the library world outside IFLA. People want much more dialogue and mutual learning, rather than a steady stream of guidelines, deadlines and reports. Ann Okerson, who heads the PC, was later interviewed by IFLA Express and expressed her strong interest in innovation.

At the Division IV Leadership Brief on Sunday, August 12, we had a lively discussion about communication within IFLA, ably led by Division Chair Anna Maria Tammaro. As a result, Division IV decided to set up a small Working Group, coordinated by NPSIG Convenor Sebastian Wilke, to address the communication issue and to develop proposals for the PC.
The Working Group had its first meeting on Tuesday, August 14.

IFLA as an organisation is definitely moving towards greater openness, participation and web awareness. We recognise and appreciate this development. At the same time we - like many others - feel that IFLA needs to speed up the process.

IFLA is changing, but the world is changing faster. As an institution IFLA is still five to ten years behind the “best cases” of open, participatory, web oriented organisations.

The IFLA language is forward looking. It stresses inspiration, participation, empowerment and the need for change. However much of the organisational practice is rather bureaucratic. The real decision making processes are not transparent, and there is very little open debate about contested issues.

We want IFLA to "walk the talk". The best way to change this situation is to combine initiatives from the top – Governing Board, Professional Committee, IFLA HQ – with initiatives from below. This means:

* More dialogue, speaking together on a basis of equality, more transparency so that we can understand and participate in IFLA

* Decision making processes on an informal basis

* Personal visibility on the web, so that we can get to know people, their positions and their interests without going to lots of meetings

In order to help us drafting a paper on communications, we would like to start a conversation on these issues on the open web, which we invite all friends of IFLA to join. Please let us have your suggestions and ideas on how to improve the current situation regarding communications within IFLA.

As members of the Working Group, we will be active in presenting our own views in open fora. We will also do our best to follow and collect contributions from you which we will incorporate to the paper on communications to be presented by Anna Maria Tammaro for discussion at the PC meeting in December 2012.

We look forward to hearing from you!

Thanks in advance for your contributions,

Sebastian Wilke, Convenor of the New Professionals Special Interest Group (NPSIG)

Maria Cotera, Convenor of the Women, Information and Libraries Special Interest Group (WIL)

Tord Høivik, Secretary of Statistics and Evaluation Section


Ulrike Lang, Co-Chair of the Continuing Professional Development and Workplace Learning Section (CPDWL)

Dace Udre, NPSIG activist

Sanita Maleja, NPSIG activist

Dierk Eichel, Information Coordinator of NPSIG

Catharina Isberg, Information Coordinator of the CPDWL Section

Silvia Cecilia Anselmi, member of the Latin America and the Caribbean Section