Survey on LIMS used in mouse phenotyping facilities
 


There are many different definitions for the term 'LIMS'. When we are talking about LIMS in this questionnaire, we mean generation of worksheets and worklists, workload management, sample management, phenotyping data capture, manual or automatic results entry, result data management, standard report generation as well as data visualisation and data analysis.

*
1. Your name and details

2. Looking at the mice living in your facility, to which research areas do the phenotyping procedures carried out on them belong to?

3. Where or how do you store parametric phenotyping results (i.e. metric, text, boolean, categorial, ordinal data)?

4. If you use a database-driven software application for the management of phenotyping results, please describe the software

5. Technical aspects of your LIMS (please enter 'n/a' if a question cannot be answered):

6. On which level can your LIMS store phenotyping results?

7. How are results transfered from the analysing device (that captures the phenotyping raw data) into your LIMS?

8. What are your data upload policies?

9. How does your LIMS store phenotyping results?

10. How many single phenotyping results are approximately stored in your LIMS (i. e. results of the examination of one mouse and one phenotyping parameter)?



In the next questions, the term 'raw data' is used. In this context, raw data means the measured value or the phenotypic observation, which in many cases still has to be converted using a calibration curve (e.g. for photometric analysis) or has to be standardised by relating a value to the body weight to form the final value for further statistical data analysis.

11. Do you store raw data in a central database?

12. Which of the following statements regarding storage of large size mouse images (from CT, x-ray, PET, MRI, etc.) or other large files are true for your facility?

13. Are your animal husbandry management system and your LIMS inseparably connected or could they run independently as well?

14. In your LIMS, do you assign a unique sample identifier to any kind of samples?

15. Can you manage samples from animals that were not housed in your animal facility but came from external collaboration partners?

16. Do you store date and time of a measurement for any phenotyping procedure performed on a mouse?

17. Do you report metadata describing the experimental or environmental conditions during the measurement (such as reagent lot numbers, analyzing devices used, technician who performed the procedure, room temperature, diet, results of quality controls etc.) which might be relevant for the outcome?

18. Have you ever transferred phenotyping results from your LIMS into a public database in a standardised format? If yes, into which database?

19. Do collaboration partners have access to phenotyping results stored in your LIMS?

20. Can you give an overall rating of your satisfaction with the current LIMS solution?

 1 - very good2 - good3 - good enough4 - not sufficient5 - inacceptable
Functionality
Reliability
Speed
Intuitive use
Flexibility
Scalability
Quality control

21. How do you perform statistical analysis and data visualisation on your phenotyping results?

22. How do you tag "interesting" phenotyping results in your LIMS?

23. If your LIMS is a database-driven software application, where was it developed and is it available for others as well?

24. Do you have any recommendations for institutions establishing a new mouse facility from scratch on what they should pay attention to (concerning informatics aspects)?

25. Please use the space below for any kind of comments on the survey or anything else you want to tell us: