Manuscript not consistent with the scope/objectives of the journal
| | | | | |
|---|
Manuscript not submitted in accordance with the author guidelines
| | | | | |
|---|
Poor expression, language, grammar and/or spelling
| | | | | |
|---|
Lack of a theoretical or conceptual basis for the study | | | | | |
|---|
Lack of (or inappropriate) rationale for the study
| | | | | |
|---|
Poorly articulated or incomplete methodology section
| | | | | |
|---|
Inappropriate/inaccurate analysis and discussion section
| | | | | |
|---|
Relevance of the study to your readership is not clear | | | | | |
|---|
The study does not add to the current knowledge base
| | | | | |
|---|
The study lacks rigour and findings are unreliable
| | | | | |
|---|
Research or other forms of misconduct are suspected (e.g. plagiarism, redundant publication, inappropriate author attribution etc.)
| | | | | |
|---|
Authors fail to action all of the suggestions made by your reviewers | | | | | |
|---|