DEM 2010 Conference Evaluation
Exit this survey

1.

1. As an incentive to complete the evaluation we will have a drawing for a complimentary registration for next year’s conference. Simply fill out the evaluation, either on-line or the paper version, and enter your contact information to be eligible. The drawing will take place on Friday, Dec. 3, 2010 and the winner will be contacted via email.

As an incentive to complete the evaluation we will have a drawing for a complimentary registration for next year’s conference. Simply fill out the evaluation, either on-line or the paper version, and enter your contact information to be eligible. The drawing will take place on Friday, Dec. 3, 2010 and the winner will be contacted via email. First Name:
Last Name:
Company:
Email Address:
Phone Number:

2. Do you plan to attend next year’s conference in Chicago?

Do you plan to attend next year’s conference in Chicago? Yes

Maybe

Comments

3. Do we need a society devoted to Diagnostic Error in Medicine?

Do we need a society devoted to Diagnostic Error in Medicine? Yes

Comments

4. Would you like to be more involved with the Diagnostic Error in Medicine movement?

Would you like to be more involved with the Diagnostic Error in Medicine movement? YES, please contact me.

No, not at this time

Comments

5. I would participate in an online community (e.g., listserv, Wiki, blog, social network site) devoted to Diagnostic Error in Medicine between annual meetings.

I would participate in an online community (e.g., listserv, Wiki, blog, social network site) devoted to Diagnostic Error in Medicine between annual meetings. Yes

Comments

6. The Conference goal is to build a scientific and practical understanding of diagnostic error in medicine and foster the development of solutions. Please rate the following.

	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Unsure	Agree	Strongly Agree
This meeting met its published objectives.	*The Conference goal is to build a scientific and practical understanding of diagnostic error in medicine and foster the development of solutions. Please rate the following. This meeting met its published objectives. Strongly Disagree	This meeting met its published objectives. Disagree	This meeting met its published objectives. Unsure	This meeting met its published objectives. Agree	This meeting met its published objectives. Strongly Agree
This meeting has enhanced my professional effectiveness/patient care.	This meeting has enhanced my professional effectiveness/patient care. Strongly Disagree	This meeting has enhanced my professional effectiveness/patient care. Disagree	This meeting has enhanced my professional effectiveness/patient care. Unsure	This meeting has enhanced my professional effectiveness/patient care. Agree	This meeting has enhanced my professional effectiveness/patient care. Strongly Agree
The content was objective and balanced.	The content was objective and balanced. Strongly Disagree	The content was objective and balanced. Disagree	The content was objective and balanced. Unsure	The content was objective and balanced. Agree	The content was objective and balanced. Strongly Agree
The content was evidence-based.	The content was evidence-based. Strongly Disagree	The content was evidence-based. Disagree	The content was evidence-based. Unsure	The content was evidence-based. Agree	The content was evidence-based. Strongly Agree
The type of evidence was identified.	The type of evidence was identified. Strongly Disagree	The type of evidence was identified. Disagree	The type of evidence was identified. Unsure	The type of evidence was identified. Agree	The type of evidence was identified. Strongly Agree
The source of evidence was identified.	The source of evidence was identified. Strongly Disagree	The source of evidence was identified. Disagree	The source of evidence was identified. Unsure	The source of evidence was identified. Agree	The source of evidence was identified. Strongly Agree
There was no inappropriate commercial bias toward products of any company. (If there was, please describe under “comments” below).	There was no inappropriate commercial bias toward products of any company. (If there was, please describe under “comments” below). Strongly Disagree	There was no inappropriate commercial bias toward products of any company. (If there was, please describe under “comments” below). Disagree	There was no inappropriate commercial bias toward products of any company. (If there was, please describe under “comments” below). Unsure	There was no inappropriate commercial bias toward products of any company. (If there was, please describe under “comments” below). Agree	There was no inappropriate commercial bias toward products of any company. (If there was, please describe under “comments” below). Strongly Agree
The printed materials were well organized and complete.	The printed materials were well organized and complete. Strongly Disagree	The printed materials were well organized and complete. Disagree	The printed materials were well organized and complete. Unsure	The printed materials were well organized and complete. Agree	The printed materials were well organized and complete. Strongly Agree
My educational expectations for attending the conference were met.	My educational expectations for attending the conference were met. Strongly Disagree	My educational expectations for attending the conference were met. Disagree	My educational expectations for attending the conference were met. Unsure	My educational expectations for attending the conference were met. Agree	My educational expectations for attending the conference were met. Strongly Agree
I liked the format of having the DEM and SMDM meetings completely overlapping with some shared sessions	I liked the format of having the DEM and SMDM meetings completely overlapping with some shared sessions Strongly Disagree	I liked the format of having the DEM and SMDM meetings completely overlapping with some shared sessions Disagree	I liked the format of having the DEM and SMDM meetings completely overlapping with some shared sessions Unsure	I liked the format of having the DEM and SMDM meetings completely overlapping with some shared sessions Agree	I liked the format of having the DEM and SMDM meetings completely overlapping with some shared sessions Strongly Agree

Comments

7. THE ONE THING I liked best about the conference

THE ONE THING I liked best about the conference

8. THE ONE THING that could have been improved

THE ONE THING that could have been improved

9. How can WE best increase attendance at next year’s meeting?

How can WE best increase attendance at next year’s meeting?

10. We would love to hear why you attend the DEM Conference. We would like to use attendee testimonials to promote the Conference going forward. By entering your comments you are giving DEM permission to use your testimonial along with your name in print and / or on the DEM website to advertise for future DEM events

Why I attend the DEM Conference:

We would love to hear why you attend the DEM Conference. We would like to use attendee testimonials to promote the Conference going forward. By entering your comments you are giving DEM permission to use your testimonial along with your name in print and / or on the DEM website to advertise for future DEM events Why I attend the DEM Conference:

11. Monday Sessions, the information was relevant and useful

	Poor	Below Average	Average	Above Average	Excellent
Learning from Diagnostic Mistakes - Kaveh Shojania	*Monday Sessions, the information was relevant and useful Learning from Diagnostic Mistakes - Kaveh Shojania Poor	Learning from Diagnostic Mistakes - Kaveh Shojania Below Average	Learning from Diagnostic Mistakes - Kaveh Shojania Average	Learning from Diagnostic Mistakes - Kaveh Shojania Above Average	Learning from Diagnostic Mistakes - Kaveh Shojania Excellent
Oral Abstracts	Oral Abstracts Poor	Oral Abstracts Below Average	Oral Abstracts Average	Oral Abstracts Above Average	Oral Abstracts Excellent
Posters	Posters Poor	Posters Below Average	Posters Average	Posters Above Average	Posters Excellent
Diagnostic Errors Related to Test Results - Singh & Epner	Diagnostic Errors Related to Test Results - Singh & Epner Poor	Diagnostic Errors Related to Test Results - Singh & Epner Below Average	Diagnostic Errors Related to Test Results - Singh & Epner Average	Diagnostic Errors Related to Test Results - Singh & Epner Above Average	Diagnostic Errors Related to Test Results - Singh & Epner Excellent

12. Monday Sessions, the overall program content & presentation was …

	Poor	Below Average	Average	Above Average	Excellent
Learning from Diagnostic Mistakes - Kaveh Shojania	*Monday Sessions, the overall program content & presentation was … Learning from Diagnostic Mistakes - Kaveh Shojania Poor	Learning from Diagnostic Mistakes - Kaveh Shojania Below Average	Learning from Diagnostic Mistakes - Kaveh Shojania Average	Learning from Diagnostic Mistakes - Kaveh Shojania Above Average	Learning from Diagnostic Mistakes - Kaveh Shojania Excellent
Oral Abstracts	Oral Abstracts Poor	Oral Abstracts Below Average	Oral Abstracts Average	Oral Abstracts Above Average	Oral Abstracts Excellent
Posters	Posters Poor	Posters Below Average	Posters Average	Posters Above Average	Posters Excellent
Diagnostic Errors Related to Test Results - Singh & Epner	Diagnostic Errors Related to Test Results - Singh & Epner Poor	Diagnostic Errors Related to Test Results - Singh & Epner Below Average	Diagnostic Errors Related to Test Results - Singh & Epner Average	Diagnostic Errors Related to Test Results - Singh & Epner Above Average	Diagnostic Errors Related to Test Results - Singh & Epner Excellent

Comments

13. Tuesday Sessions, the information was relevant and useful

	Poor	Below Average	Average	Above Average	Excellent
Current Research Approaches to Diagnostic Error - Schiff, Schull, Kostopoulou	*Tuesday Sessions, the information was relevant and useful Current Research Approaches to Diagnostic Error - Schiff, Schull, Kostopoulou Poor	Current Research Approaches to Diagnostic Error - Schiff, Schull, Kostopoulou Below Average	Current Research Approaches to Diagnostic Error - Schiff, Schull, Kostopoulou Average	Current Research Approaches to Diagnostic Error - Schiff, Schull, Kostopoulou Above Average	Current Research Approaches to Diagnostic Error - Schiff, Schull, Kostopoulou Excellent
Keynote: Safe Patients, Smart Hospitals - Peter Pronovost	Keynote: Safe Patients, Smart Hospitals - Peter Pronovost Poor	Keynote: Safe Patients, Smart Hospitals - Peter Pronovost Below Average	Keynote: Safe Patients, Smart Hospitals - Peter Pronovost Average	Keynote: Safe Patients, Smart Hospitals - Peter Pronovost Above Average	Keynote: Safe Patients, Smart Hospitals - Peter Pronovost Excellent
Research Methods Panel - Pronovost et al	Research Methods Panel - Pronovost et al Poor	Research Methods Panel - Pronovost et al Below Average	Research Methods Panel - Pronovost et al Average	Research Methods Panel - Pronovost et al Above Average	Research Methods Panel - Pronovost et al Excellent
SMDM - SJDM - DEM Joint Session Clinical Reasoning	SMDM - SJDM - DEM Joint Session Clinical Reasoning Poor	SMDM - SJDM - DEM Joint Session Clinical Reasoning Below Average	SMDM - SJDM - DEM Joint Session Clinical Reasoning Average	SMDM - SJDM - DEM Joint Session Clinical Reasoning Above Average	SMDM - SJDM - DEM Joint Session Clinical Reasoning Excellent
Breakout - Setting the Agenda for Diagnostic Error Research	Breakout - Setting the Agenda for Diagnostic Error Research Poor	Breakout - Setting the Agenda for Diagnostic Error Research Below Average	Breakout - Setting the Agenda for Diagnostic Error Research Average	Breakout - Setting the Agenda for Diagnostic Error Research Above Average	Breakout - Setting the Agenda for Diagnostic Error Research Excellent

14. Tuesday Sessions, the overall program content & presentation was …

	Poor	Below Average	Average	Above Average	Excellent
Current Research Approaches to Diagnostic Error - Schiff, Schull, Kostopoulou	*Tuesday Sessions, the overall program content & presentation was … Current Research Approaches to Diagnostic Error - Schiff, Schull, Kostopoulou Poor	Current Research Approaches to Diagnostic Error - Schiff, Schull, Kostopoulou Below Average	Current Research Approaches to Diagnostic Error - Schiff, Schull, Kostopoulou Average	Current Research Approaches to Diagnostic Error - Schiff, Schull, Kostopoulou Above Average	Current Research Approaches to Diagnostic Error - Schiff, Schull, Kostopoulou Excellent
Keynote: Safe Patients, Smart Hospitals - Peter Pronovost	Keynote: Safe Patients, Smart Hospitals - Peter Pronovost Poor	Keynote: Safe Patients, Smart Hospitals - Peter Pronovost Below Average	Keynote: Safe Patients, Smart Hospitals - Peter Pronovost Average	Keynote: Safe Patients, Smart Hospitals - Peter Pronovost Above Average	Keynote: Safe Patients, Smart Hospitals - Peter Pronovost Excellent
Research Methods Panel - Pronovost et al	Research Methods Panel - Pronovost et al Poor	Research Methods Panel - Pronovost et al Below Average	Research Methods Panel - Pronovost et al Average	Research Methods Panel - Pronovost et al Above Average	Research Methods Panel - Pronovost et al Excellent
SMDM - SJDM - DEM Joint Session Clinical Reasoning	SMDM - SJDM - DEM Joint Session Clinical Reasoning Poor	SMDM - SJDM - DEM Joint Session Clinical Reasoning Below Average	SMDM - SJDM - DEM Joint Session Clinical Reasoning Average	SMDM - SJDM - DEM Joint Session Clinical Reasoning Above Average	SMDM - SJDM - DEM Joint Session Clinical Reasoning Excellent
Breakout - Setting the Agenda for Diagnostic Error Research	Breakout - Setting the Agenda for Diagnostic Error Research Poor	Breakout - Setting the Agenda for Diagnostic Error Research Below Average	Breakout - Setting the Agenda for Diagnostic Error Research Average	Breakout - Setting the Agenda for Diagnostic Error Research Above Average	Breakout - Setting the Agenda for Diagnostic Error Research Excellent

Comments

15. Wednesday Sessions, the information was relevant and useful

	Poor	Below Average	Average	Above Average	Excellent
Improving Diagnostic Accuracy - What Will it Take Redelmeier & Shojania	*Wednesday Sessions, the information was relevant and useful Improving Diagnostic Accuracy - What Will it Take Redelmeier & Shojania Poor	Improving Diagnostic Accuracy - What Will it Take Redelmeier & Shojania Below Average	Improving Diagnostic Accuracy - What Will it Take Redelmeier & Shojania Average	Improving Diagnostic Accuracy - What Will it Take Redelmeier & Shojania Above Average	Improving Diagnostic Accuracy - What Will it Take Redelmeier & Shojania Excellent
Can Evidence Based Medicine Help Reduce Diagnostic Error - Haynes, Guyann, Bowers Jones, McKibbon	Can Evidence Based Medicine Help Reduce Diagnostic Error - Haynes, Guyann, Bowers Jones, McKibbon Poor	Can Evidence Based Medicine Help Reduce Diagnostic Error - Haynes, Guyann, Bowers Jones, McKibbon Below Average	Can Evidence Based Medicine Help Reduce Diagnostic Error - Haynes, Guyann, Bowers Jones, McKibbon Average	Can Evidence Based Medicine Help Reduce Diagnostic Error - Haynes, Guyann, Bowers Jones, McKibbon Above Average	Can Evidence Based Medicine Help Reduce Diagnostic Error - Haynes, Guyann, Bowers Jones, McKibbon Excellent
Simulation to Reduce Diagnostic Error - Gosbee, Montgomery, Papier	Simulation to Reduce Diagnostic Error - Gosbee, Montgomery, Papier Poor	Simulation to Reduce Diagnostic Error - Gosbee, Montgomery, Papier Below Average	Simulation to Reduce Diagnostic Error - Gosbee, Montgomery, Papier Average	Simulation to Reduce Diagnostic Error - Gosbee, Montgomery, Papier Above Average	Simulation to Reduce Diagnostic Error - Gosbee, Montgomery, Papier Excellent

16. Wednesday Sessions, the overall program content & presentation was …

	Poor	Below Average	Average	Above Average	Excellent
Improving Diagnostic Accuracy - What Will it Take Redelmeier & Shojania	*Wednesday Sessions, the overall program content & presentation was … Improving Diagnostic Accuracy - What Will it Take Redelmeier & Shojania Poor	Improving Diagnostic Accuracy - What Will it Take Redelmeier & Shojania Below Average	Improving Diagnostic Accuracy - What Will it Take Redelmeier & Shojania Average	Improving Diagnostic Accuracy - What Will it Take Redelmeier & Shojania Above Average	Improving Diagnostic Accuracy - What Will it Take Redelmeier & Shojania Excellent
Can Evidence Based Medicine Help Reduce Diagnostic Error - Haynes, Guyann, Bowers Jones, McKibbon	Can Evidence Based Medicine Help Reduce Diagnostic Error - Haynes, Guyann, Bowers Jones, McKibbon Poor	Can Evidence Based Medicine Help Reduce Diagnostic Error - Haynes, Guyann, Bowers Jones, McKibbon Below Average	Can Evidence Based Medicine Help Reduce Diagnostic Error - Haynes, Guyann, Bowers Jones, McKibbon Average	Can Evidence Based Medicine Help Reduce Diagnostic Error - Haynes, Guyann, Bowers Jones, McKibbon Above Average	Can Evidence Based Medicine Help Reduce Diagnostic Error - Haynes, Guyann, Bowers Jones, McKibbon Excellent
Simulation to Reduce Diagnostic Error - Gosbee, Montgomery, Papier	Simulation to Reduce Diagnostic Error - Gosbee, Montgomery, Papier Poor	Simulation to Reduce Diagnostic Error - Gosbee, Montgomery, Papier Below Average	Simulation to Reduce Diagnostic Error - Gosbee, Montgomery, Papier Average	Simulation to Reduce Diagnostic Error - Gosbee, Montgomery, Papier Above Average	Simulation to Reduce Diagnostic Error - Gosbee, Montgomery, Papier Excellent

Comments

17. Additional Comments/ Suggestions

Additional Comments/ Suggestions

DEM 2010 Conference EvaluationExit this survey

1.

DEM 2010 Conference Evaluation
Exit this survey