Exit this survey

1. 2011 CSSS Week Three Lecture Evaluation

INSTRUCTIONS: Your participation is anonymous. All information provided is kept confidential and is used to help SFI learn more about how to improve the CSSS. Your responses will not be identified with you in any way. Your participation is also voluntary. You are free to skip any question you are uncomfortable providing answers to. You are also free to not respond at all. However, we ask that you return the instrument, even if you elect not to respond at all. If there are any questions that you feel you are unable to or prefer not to answer, please leave them blank.

** Please be sure to complete a separate evaluation for each lecturer. **

Question Title

* Class/Instructor

Question Title

* I learned to value new viewpoints

Question Title

* The instructor was boring

Question Title

* I learned more in this lecture than I expected to learn

Question Title

* The instructor was well prepared

Question Title

* The instructor seemed to DIS-like students

Question Title

* I learned a great deal in this lecture

Question Title

* The instructor puts material across in an interesting way

Question Title

* The instructor was responsive to questions

Question Title

* The instructor did NOT seem to enjoy teaching

Question Title

* The lecture helped me develop the ability to think through a problem or argument

Question Title

* This lecture did NOT challenge me intellectually

Question Title

* In comparison to all the other instructors I have had he/she was one of the best

Question Title

* This instructor deserves an overall rating of (1 = Very Poor Instructor; 5=Excellent Instructor)

Question Title

* This lecture deserves an overall rating of (1 = Very Poor Lecture; 5=Excellent Lecture)

Question Title

* Please use the space to provide any additional comments or feedback about this speaker or lecture

T